[Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to -devel].
On Saturday 05 September 2009 01:21:00 pm Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The plan is to
> change upstart to actually use /etc/inittab, to ease the switch
> between sysvinit and upstart.
Please don't. As you correctly pointed out,
Hi all,
Does anybody want to test the current openswan 1:2.2.0-7 packages at
http://www.gibraltar.at/~rene/openswan/
or should I upload to unstable? If nobody can give it a try, I intent to
upload tomorrow morning (GMT+2).
with best regards,
Rene
pgpfPMFhLmWTB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Steve Langasek schrieb:
>>If that 2.3.x bug really only affects the newer (> 2.6.8) kernel, why
>>not just get 2.3.x pushed into sarge? Are there any other big issues
>>with it, that weren't in 2.2.x? Some people might certainly like the
>>agressive mode support, or 2.3.1's NAT-T fixes. Personally,
Am Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 02:40 schrieb Anthony DeRobertis:
> Seconded! The only RC-bug in openswan is for a newer version of the
> kernel which will not ship with Sarge.
Yes, that's true. I have to admit that I messed up in not marking this bug
sid. My current best solution would be to put 2.2.0-
Hi Yas,
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2005 15:57 schrieb Yaacov Akiba Slama:
> openswan 2.2.0-4 still crashes when using 2.3.1 (your package from
> http://www.gibraltar.at/~rene/openswan/) as roadwarrior.
Yes, I have also noticed that and can currently reproduce it here on my
system. I have already bomba
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2005 06:59 schrieb Paul TBBle Hampson:
> I just tried openswan-modules-source under 2.6.10 with make-kpkg, and it
> installed
> /lib/modules/2.6.10/kernel/net/ipsec/ipsec.o
> instead of
> /lib/modules/2.6.10/kernel/net/ipsec/ipsec.ko
Thanks for the hint - I have fixed a type a
Am Samstag, 9. April 2005 22:32 schrieb Rene Mayrhofer:
> If you can, then please test as much as you can. My current test packages
> are at
> http://www.gibraltar.at/~rene/openswan/
I have just uploaded new packages with a small change in kernel-patch-openswan
(a file was missing). I
Am Samstag, 9. April 2005 17:31 schrieb Paul TBBle Hampson:
> I'm interested in testing the new version, although the problem I was
> suffering was a windows interoperability bug (Win2K Ipsec would crash
> pluto) which I reported to the Openswan list and was told it would
> probably be fixed in 2.3
Hi all,
[Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to this list.]
Since yesterday, openswan upstream 2.3.1 is on the download servers, and it
should supposedly fix the problems of 2.3.0 (specifically that it caused all
other openswan daemons, be it 2.2.0 or 2.3.0, to crash in some
Hi all,
[Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to this list.]
As some have already noticed, openswan has been removed from testing a while
ago, most probably because of bug #291274, which did not apply to package
version 2.2.0-4 (the one that has been removed from testing). As
Hi all,
[Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to -devel. This is
also cross-posted to debian-user because it might affect users that are not
subscribed to -devel.]
I have thought for quite some time about this issue and have now come to a
decision. Sorry that it's rather late
Anthony Towns wrote:
* #203339 - freeswan - Rene Mayrhofer
FTBFS, patch in the bug log since July, no further activity
I feel that I need to respond to that, after being mentioned here :)
I fully admit that I have simply overlooked this one, because it is very
easy to fix (and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
[Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to debian-devel.]
I have, most probably due to my own stupidity, problems uploading new
packages of freeswan. Since 2002-08-05, there is a 1.98b-1 package
sitting in queue/new on ftp-master
Hi Bastiaan,
[To readers of debian-devel: please CC me and possibly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in replies so that we can follow
discussions. I am currently not subscribed to debian-devel.]
Bastiaan Niels Veelo wrote:
> I have hopes that my Gibraltar box can act as a wireless LAN Access
> Point. I bought a
Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Is Debian really that unpopular on Gibraltar?
> Why not simply include them, so that Debian users in Gibraltar can use it?
Gibraltar is Debian-based, a firewall distribution bootable from CD-ROM.
But installing the gibraltar-bootsupport package on a Debian system that
is in
Hi all
Please CC me in replies, I am currently not subscribed to -devel.
I am the maintainer of the mkinitrd-cd package and have made many
improvements since the last release so, I would like to update it. But
because of a restructuring of the package, the source package has been
renamed from mki
Adam Heath wrote:
>
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2001, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
>
> > [snip]
>
> Could you please run dpkg-scanpackages, and dpkg-scansources, so that we can
> use apt to install this stuff? Txs.
Done. It should not be apt-able with
deb ftp://ftp.vianova.at/pub/gibra
Hi all
Please reply directly to me as I am currently not subscribed to -devel.
I have ITPed for freeswan quite a while ago and have made "semi-official"
(people who were interested at that time knew of the download location) packages
since then. Now I am happy enough with my version of the freesw
Hi all
I am going to vacation for the next 3 weeks, so if there is anything wrong with
one of my packages (pptpd, logcheck, mkinitrd-cd) then please feel free to do
NMUs.
best greets,
Rene
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
I intent to package freeswan (currently version 1.5) and have already taken the
freeswan 1.3 package from Tommi Virtanen and the freeswan 1.5 package from Aaron
Johnson. I will merge those with my own package and hope to get something that
can be uploaded into woody in the next 2 weeks.
Since I liv
Brian May wrote:
> When you loaded that image, whether you used apache, gimp, xv, or
> something else, it would automatically know what file type it is without
> any excessive overhead.
In my opinion one of the best features of BeOS is that the file type is
an extra attribute stored at file system
Joseph Carter wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 04, 1999 at 07:45:23PM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
> > Is it possible to use a key created by pgp5 for package signing ? The
> > key works for me when I use it with gpg, both the opposite is not true
> > (e.g. pgp5 is unable to verify
Hi all
Is it possible to use a key created by pgp5 for package signing ? The
key works for me when I use it with gpg, both the opposite is not true
(e.g. pgp5 is unable to verify a signature created with a gpg key). I am
no maintainer yet and so I want to start cleanly. What is the "right"
way if
Guido Guenther wrote:
>
> I've also packaged portsentry:
>
> http://honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de/~agx/debian/dists/stable/main/binary-i386/
> Sean Perry and me contacted the upstream maintainer and he is currently
> reconsidering the
> license. Maybe we can join efforts?
We should definit
Thomas Schoepf wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 29, 1999 at 10:25:32AM +0200, Rene Mayrhofer wrote:
>
> > PS: I have a written statement from the author that distribution with
> > Debian is permitted.
>
> Why do you need such a statement? Doesn't the original licens
Matthew Vernon wrote:
>
> Rene Mayrhofer writes:
> > portsentry is a daemon that listens for port scans (also stealth scans)
> > and is able to disconnect and remember the attacking hosts in real-time.
> > It uses ipchains for disconnecting and tcp wrappers for pr
logcheck runs periodically and checks the system logs for unusual and
alerting events. These are reported to the administrator by email.
The logcheck package is suggested by portsentry.
Please look at http://www.psionic.com/abacus/logcheck for more
information.
I have also a beta version of the lo
portsentry is a daemon that listens for port scans (also stealth scans)
and is able to disconnect and remember the attacking hosts in real-time.
It uses ipchains for disconnecting and tcp wrappers for preventing hosts
from further connections.
Please look at http://www.psionic.com/abacus/portsentry
> Is it okay to go into the primary distribution, or would it be forced
> into nonus? If it's okay for ftp.debian.org, I can sponsor it for you.
I am not sure about this. pptpd itself should be ok in main, but the
modified ppp and kernel packages (these are needed for the data
encryption) contain R
Chris Cheney wrote:
>
> I am appling to become a new maintainer. I am intending to package pptpd
> which is the point to point tunneling protocol daemon.
I already applied and have the pptpd package sitting on my machine. It
is already tested on 2 corporate firewalls. I also have modified ppp a
t for the new script.
Rene
--
--
Rene Mayrhofer, ViaNova KEG NIC-HDL: RM1677-RIPE
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Snail: Penz 217, A-4441 Behamberg
PGP(DSS): E661 2E45 9B7F B239 D422 0A90 A4C2 DA09 F72F 6EC5
PGP(D/H): B77F 51A
on is not sold
because of Portsentry.
Thanks in advance
Rene
--
--
Rene Mayrhofer, ViaNova KEG NIC-HDL: RM1677-RIPE
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Snail: Penz 217, A-4441 Behamberg
PGP(DSS): E661 2E45
er). If you
have access to the CVS, I could send you the source packages.
Rene
(Student of Computer Science at the Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Austria)
--
------
Rene Mayrhofer, ViaNova KEG NIC-HDL: R
33 matches
Mail list logo
