Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > Maybe we should create a pci.ids package with just this file and a
> > script to download a fresh version from a suitable location.
>
> Where/which is the authoritative source for this file?
>
> If there isn't one, then things get quite difficult...
There i
T.Pospisek's MailLists wrote:
> > But anyway - I agree that Debian should not be too conservative
> > with regard to new networking technologies, so disabling ECN by
> > default is not something I'd like to see happen. Give the user some
> > short explanation and let him make the decision himself,
Eric Van Buggenhaut wrote:
> Routers aren't forced to support ECN (although it's in their
> interest) but they aren't allowed to drop ECN-flagged TCP packets.
>
> If you can't access a site, *they* need to fix their buggy router to be
> ECN-tolerant. If they don't do so, they're violating RFC 793.
Seth Cohn wrote:
>
> Looks like digests are broken, could someone fix please?
Digests are broken at the moment. I sent out a bunch of digests this
morning, catching up with the email from the last couple of days.
I hope it will be business as usual quite soon.
Cheers,
Remco.
--
Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> > The libgd maintainer decided to drop support for a libc5-based
> > libgd and renamed the libgd1g package to libgd1 (I personally don't
> > think that this was a good idea as it might cause problems during
> > upgrades).
>
> Do I interpret this right that I should file a
Paul Slootman wrote:
> > On http://www.nl.debian.org/devel/developers.loc , there's supposed
> > to be a jpeg of a world map with debian developers. On the main
> > website, www.debian.org, there is.
> >
> > It seems that the .nl webserver is interpreting the filename
> > "developers.map.jpeg" as
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> Sounds good. Can you bug upstream to include support for other
> authentication methods eg SecureID? I'm stuck with a Windows IPsec
> client until SecureID is supported. KAME (on BSD) doesn't appear to
> do it either.
SecureID is really in another "layer" of authentication.
Steve Greenland wrote:
> > If 250 attend that's $175k. Plus some unkown amount to rent out a
> > convention center.
>
> Something you might consider is that colleges and universities often
> rent out dorm rooms in the summer. It wouldn't be plush, of course, but
> you'd probably be able to get a d
Leon Breedt wrote:
> apcupsd is a package to monitor and control APC UPS's.
May I ask you where I can download its source code? :)
I was looking for it some time ago and wasnt able to find any sources of
relatively new versions of apcupsd.
Anyways, great to have this package in Debian.
Regard
Thomas Schoepf wrote:
>
> How are those Packages(.gz) files on ftp.debian.org created? Is there a
> .deb package available for download that provides that functionality?
dpkg-scanpackages from the dpkg-dev package creates the Packages file.
HTH,
-Remco
Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> >So specify the section as `non-us/non-free' or `non-us/contrib'. It's
> >fine to put something after that if you want to, `non-us/non-free/web'
> >for example. It will just be ignored.
>
> How do I distinguish between "stable" and "unstable" in this scenario ?
B
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>
> Does anyone know where I can find the software to run a debian upload
> queue? I thought it was packaged but I can't seem to find it using the
> obvois searches..
There is a tar.gz file in project/misc.
-Remco
Joel Klecker wrote:
> pciutils - Utils for listing/tweaking PCI devices in 2.1/2.2 kernels
>
> Bug-free, lintian-clean
> There are some upstream alpha releases that would be nice to
> have packaged somewhere, but not essential
If noone objects, I'll
Joey Hess wrote:
> I'm forced to agree. Support for swap partitions > 128 mb is a new
> feature; a mkswap that doesn't support it isn't a major incompatability.
> Few people will need the feature anyway, and if they do need it the simple
> workaround is to use multiple 128 mb partitions.
Okay, rea
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> > I just discovered, unfortunately, that you need the util-linux package
> > from potato (unstable). Rest of the things in slink are fine with
> > 2.2.0!!
>
> Why's that? I'm using the one from slink with 2.2.0 and it works just
> fine. I've been running 2.2.0-pre6 for a co
Hi,
With this message, I know I'm going to touch a rather sensitive subject, but
however, I think it's worth it.
I just tried to match the Changes file from Linux-2.2.0 with the slink
distribution, and was happy to find out that almost every requirement
mentioned in that file is fullfilled by the
Gergely Madarasz wrote:
> Another problem: bootpc from the netstd package does not work with 2.2.
> Btw the kernel has bootp support itself, but it can't be used with pnp
> network cards which need isapnp initialization. So my network setup which
> used bootp breaks with 2.2...
But is that specifi
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > modutils, gcc, binutils, libc5, libc6, ldso, procps, sysutils, psmisc,
> > hostname, loadlin, shellutils, autofs, nfs-server, bash, ncpfs,
> > pcmcia-cs, ppp, util-linux.
> >
> > If you get the versions of these packages that are in the currently
> > frozen Debian dist
Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> Will some guru tell us what critical packages we need to update in order
> to use 2.2 ?
I'm not a guru I guess, but I can cut&paste something from
linux/Documentation/Changes:
- Kernel modules 2.1.121 ; insmod -V
- Gnu C 2.7.2.3
Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> (BTW, is kernel-headers still needed? libc6-dev ships with a full set of
> headers, doesn't it?)
Right, but those are for 2.0.36 and the ones that come with 2.1/2.2 are
different (and yes, I need those new ones thus I have to manually edit the
things in /usr/include everyt
Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > I finally worked out what a great feature apt-get install is. I was
> > wondering whether anybody has thought of making an option such as -s to
> > instead download the source files for the named package.
>
> There are a handfull of bugs about exactly that and indeed we
On Sun, 18 Oct 1998, Chris Leishman wrote:
: On Sat, Oct 17, 1998 at 06:07:17PM -0500, Stephen Crowley wrote:
: > Ok, i just apt-get upgraded about an hour ago, to my horror i can no
: > longer login, nor can I su, it just sits there doing nothing. I
: > also cannot telnet to localhost. Someon
On Wed, 10 Jun 1998, Joel Klecker wrote:
: gd 1.3 is now DFSG free, and works around the patent issues too. I have
: uploaded a non-maintainer release of gd to main, thus, webalizer can go in
: main.
Sounds reasonable. Though, in the copyright file of webalizer, the copyright
text of GD (1.2!)
Hey,
I'm currently applying for being a Debian maintainer (using the Debian
Developer's Reference).
I created a package of the Webalizer software:
Package: webalizer
Status: install ok installed
Installed-Size: 108
Maintainer: Remco van de Meent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Version
24 matches
Mail list logo
