> I agree with James Treacy's observation that we will probably need two
> logos: one logo with a liberal license that people can just freely, and
> another, more restricted logo for things like official CD's and so.
This seems like a logical solution. Having the official "Debian" logo
could p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think it would be great for Debian to get 2.2 in to slink, even if it is
> priority extra.
I agree it should be included. We can change the priority so it's not
automatically installed and warn people that it is experimental/might break
things in dselect's descript
2 matches
Mail list logo
