Re: switching from exim to postfix

2012-04-30 Thread Raf Czlonka
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 01:55:24PM BST, Adam Borowski wrote: > Not on a laptop or any machine that has to conserve power and avoid > unnecessary wakeups / disk spin-ups. Or any device with an SSD or SD card (more and more popular net-tops nowadays). > A cronjob every 5 minutes means you need to s

Re: ITP: ipmiutil -- Easy-to-use IPMI server management utilities

2011-11-28 Thread Raf Czlonka
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 08:58:42PM GMT, Andy Cress wrote: > It supports Windows servers, the others do not. So users who have mixed OS > environments would prefer ipmiutil. If that's true it's enough of a reason for me for it to be packaged. Regards, -- Raf -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb

Re: daily build 24/11/11

2011-11-25 Thread Raf Czlonka
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 05:35:35AM GMT, Richard wrote: > I was always under the impression it was worth checking with others before > raising a bug, and keeping > the volume of bug request down. It is, not on debian-devel though. debian-devel - Development of Debian, Discussion about technical

Re: New package doesn't fix the problem in the old version

2011-10-11 Thread Raf Czlonka
On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 04:50:35PM BST, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > To nitpick a bit, your third possibility mentioned that the fix is "not > worth", but there are at least two sub-cases there: (1) maintainer does > not want to spend *their own time* preparing the fix, but would gladly > accept pat

Re: New package doesn't fix the problem in the old version

2011-10-07 Thread Raf Czlonka
Hi Ian, Thanks for taking the time to reply. > > > All I was trying to do was to establish was whether you're being > > > lazy/unhelpful or is there a policy which I've missed as, [...] I admit that I should have allowed a third possibility here. > There is a third possibility which is that the

Re: New package doesn't fix the problem in the old version

2011-10-07 Thread Raf Czlonka
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 06:09:18PM BST, Daniel Baumann wrote: > my opinion.. [cut] > * unstable and *testing* users are supposed to be able to cope with > the one or other glitch, if they don't, they use stable. I know that, thank you. I've been doing that for nearly a decade. > * this is

Re: New package doesn't fix the problem in the old version

2011-10-07 Thread Raf Czlonka
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 05:26:03PM BST, Bernhard R. Link wrote: > As I had problems of understanding this first let me recap the > situation: > > git-stuff before 5-1 created a buggy file when getting installed that > is still causing problems when git-stuff 7-1 is installed. > > So it's not so m

New package doesn't fix the problem in the old version

2011-10-07 Thread Raf Czlonka
Hi all, Recently I filed a bug report against git-stuff[0] which itself been closed with the explanation that it's a duplicate of an earlier bug[1] which itself has been closed by the maintainer claiming it had been fixed in version 5-1. While the new package indeed does not contain the bug itsel