Re: Bug#1094969: git linked with OpenSSL

2025-04-16 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 4/16/25 12:34 PM, Henrik Ahlgren wrote: BTW, FSF considers Apache 2.0 as a good license and that "it's unfortunate that the Apache License 2.0 isn't compatible with some free software licenses like GPLv2". Compatibility with it was one important goal for GPLv3. So, this incompatibility was not

Re: Bug#1094969: git linked with OpenSSL

2025-04-15 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 14/04/2025 1:59 pm, Henrik Ahlgren wrote: Pirate Praveen writes: Didn't OpenSSL switch license to Apache 2.0 and now compatible with GPL? What am I missing here? https://gplv3.fsf.org/wiki/index.php/Compatible_licenses#GPLv2-incompatible_licenses Thanks, so only GPL v3/v2+ is compa

Re: Bug#1094969: git linked with OpenSSL

2025-04-14 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 14/04/2025 11:14 am, Andreas Metzler wrote: On 2025-04-13 Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: brian m. carlson (one of the git upstream copyright holders) claims in Bug #1094969 that git cannot be distributed when linked with OpenSSL. IIRC the Debian position is to use the system library exception. I

Re: Reconsidering Debian’s Inclusion of Non-Free Firmware - A Call for Discussion

2025-03-15 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 3/9/25 9:20 PM, Ansgar 🙀 wrote: What is the point of this then? If I understood the argument of FSF correctly, the point is, having the same freedom as the hardware manufacturer to modify or not modify. In case of hardware without firmware (or fused firmware that cannot be modified furt

Re: Processing times for the NEW queue (was Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 3/11/25 6:18 PM, Wookey wrote: Do we still even _need_ to pre-review the archive the same way we have been for 30 years? Could not post-review when actual problems are noted be sufficient (given that much of the rest of the ecosystem seems to manage this, although a lot of that is source rathe

Re: Revisiting the idea of pre-NEW peer review? (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 7/3/25 12:29 AM, Otto Kekäläinen wrote: Hi! Around 12 years ago, I proposed a peer-review system to increase the quality of the packages in the NEW queue. https://wiki.debian.org/CopyrightReview For packages that I sponsor, I already do reviews of the debian/copyright and all other files

Re: STFU please (Re: Bits from DPL)

2025-03-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 3/6/25 2:09 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: so if the/a team says they cannot handle new members right now and thus there should be no big announcement asking for new members, I very much think this should be respected and not be ignored and spread on our most visible mailing list, where there pain

Re: Tuning the ITS process (Was:Re: Barriers between packages and other people)

2025-01-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 1/6/25 10:11 PM, Andreas Tille wrote: Personally, my main challenge is having to focus on the same issue twice, with a minimum delay of 21 days in between. For example, I encountered an ITS bug that had been lingering in the BTS for over a year. The waiting period is entirely reasonable under

Re: Barriers between packages and other people

2024-12-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശ, ഡിസം 21 2024 at 04:44:01 വൈകു +08:00:00 +08:00:00, Sean Whitton wrote: Hello, On Sat 21 Dec 2024 at 08:09am +01, Gioele Barabucci wrote: On 21/12/24 03:11, Sean Whitton wrote: an alternative that I was thinking of, is making this "everybody is onboard" policy more explicit by hav

Re: A better bts? - https://fabre.debian.net

2024-12-15 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 12/16/24 12:54 AM, Richard Lewis wrote: Tiago Bortoletto Vaz writes: Btw, for triage I used to suggesthttps://fabre.debian.net to newcomers. I had some hope that it could be a start for something bigger, so I tried to have access to the code to improve a few things but never had an answer f

Re: Bits from DPL / Feedback on attracting newcomers

2024-12-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 12/11/24 7:30 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: On 12/11/24 6:35 PM, sre4e...@free.fr wrote: Le 2024-12-11 13:52, Pirate Praveen a écrit : reportbug can talk SMTP directly, is that not enough for you? without configuring an smtp server? If I run reportbug and clicks submit, does it send mail

Re: Bits from DPL / Feedback on attracting newcomers

2024-12-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 12/11/24 6:35 PM, sre4e...@free.fr wrote: Le 2024-12-11 13:52, Pirate Praveen a écrit : reportbug can talk SMTP directly, is that not enough for you? without configuring an smtp server? If I run reportbug and clicks submit, does it send mail without any extra configurations? It does

Re: Bits from DPL / Feedback on attracting newcomers

2024-12-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 12/11/24 6:10 PM, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 05:50:55PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: I think a reportbug web based front end that authenticates with salsa via oauth and sends emails without any email client needing to be configured will already help. Is it not

Re: Bits from DPL / Feedback on attracting newcomers

2024-12-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 12/11/24 5:20 PM, Marc Haber wrote: On Wed, 11 Dec 2024 17:04:52 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: I think a reportbug web based front end that authenticates with salsa via oauth and sends emails without any email client needing to be configured will already help. Is it not already the case

Re: Bits from DPL / Feedback on attracting newcomers

2024-12-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 12/11/24 8:47 AM, Charles Plessy wrote: Le Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 09:18:06AM +0100, Gard Spreemann a écrit : The BTS is core to Debian. It is e-mail based. While I personally think e-mail-based workflows can be quite nice, the BTS' asynchronous nature did cause me a lot of extra pointless w

Re: Bits from DPL / Feedback on attracting newcomers

2024-12-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
2024, ഡിസം 5 2:05:19 AM Lucas Kanashiro : > https://debconf24.debconf.org/talks/74-attracting-and-retaining-new-contributors-insights-from-brazil/ > > There was some follow-up discussion in Hacker News after a LWN post about > this talk was published: > > https://lwn.net/Articles/987548/ > https:/

Re: Bits from DPL / Feedback on attracting newcomers

2024-12-05 Thread Pirate Praveen
2024, ഡിസം 4 9:33:25 PM Robert Chéramy : > 2) What should I read first if I want to make a new package? > I usually suggest a step by step guide to people who are new, in this I suggest building existing packages from source and updating existing packages before creating a new package from scratc

Re: Simpler git workflow for packaging with upstreamless repositories

2024-11-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
2024, നവം 29 7:48:10 AM Otto Kekäläinen : > Thanks Pirate Praveen for providing the first actual concrete case in > this thread where pristine-tar had some issue! > > I noticed an interesting thing about this case: > > ± origtargz --download-only > pristine-tar: successfull

Re: Simpler git workflow for packaging with upstreamless repositories

2024-11-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
2024, നവം 28 5:46:47 PM Andrey Rakhmatullin : > >> Same works with >> >> pravi@mahishi2:/tmp/node-cacache$ gbp export-orig --pristine-tar > > Not sure what does this imply. gbp is able to recreate the orig tars when origtargz fails. So it is a known work around.

Re: Simpler git workflow for packaging with upstreamless repositories

2024-11-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 11/28/24 5:29 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: On 11/28/24 5:22 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, On 11/28/24 10:56, Pirate Praveen wrote: pristine-tar almost always fail when there are multiple orig tar files. I did not report bugs since the limitation of not working 100% is a known issue already

Re: Simpler git workflow for packaging with upstreamless repositories

2024-11-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 11/28/24 5:22 PM, Paul Gevers wrote: Hi, On 11/28/24 10:56, Pirate Praveen wrote: pristine-tar almost always fail when there are multiple orig tar files. I did not report bugs since the limitation of not working 100% is a known issue already. I'm surprised to hear this. src:cac

Re: Simpler git workflow for packaging with upstreamless repositories

2024-11-28 Thread Pirate Praveen
2024, നവം 28 3:06:13 PM Simon Josefsson : > I think this is a good example of us talking past each other in this > thread: some people question the value of pristine in the first place > (and I've been compelled by those arguments), and some people argue that > the cost is small and there are no bu

Re: Comments on proposing NEW queue improvement (Re: Current NEW review process saps developer motivation

2022-08-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, Aug 29 2022 at 12:33:44 PM +05:30:00 +05:30:00, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Sun, Aug 28 2022 at 07:39:12 AM +02:00:00 +02:00:00, Andreas Tille wrote: BTW, the vast amount of new packages I'm packaging are new dependencies for existing packages to get their new versions. M

Re: Comments on proposing NEW queue improvement (Re: Current NEW review process saps developer motivation

2022-08-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Sun, Aug 28 2022 at 07:39:12 AM +02:00:00 +02:00:00, Andreas Tille wrote: BTW, the vast amount of new packages I'm packaging are new dependencies for existing packages to get their new versions. May be we should be able to tag packages with in NEW into categories like this (similar to

Re: Epoch for node-markdown-it

2022-08-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെ, ഓഗ 19, 2022 at 6:00 വൈകു, Simon McVittie wrote: On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 at 21:36:24 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: Are we going to deny every epoch request or this is going to be subjective? If there was a correct objective rule for what to do, we'd be applying that rule mechani

Re: Epoch for node-markdown-it

2022-08-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ശ, ഓഗ 20, 2022 at 3:53 വൈകു, Holger Levsen wrote: On Sat, Aug 20, 2022 at 03:29:59PM +, Stefano Rivera wrote: > > Epochs cause problems, [...] > which are? (I agree they are ugly and should often be avoided, but I don't > see any unsolved problems with them, which is why I'm ask

Re: Epoch for node-markdown-it

2022-08-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Aug 19 2022 at 05:50:46 PM +02:00:00 +02:00:00, Andrej Shadura wrote: Hi, On Fri, 19 Aug 2022, at 17:45, Nilesh Patra wrote: I agree, adding an epoch in this package doesn’t seem appropriate or necessary. JTFR - Upstream released 12.0.4 in 2020, and they have reached 13.0.1

Re: how about telegram channel

2022-07-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wed, Jul 20 2022 at 03:39:40 PM +02:00:00 +02:00:00, Pirate Praveen wrote: On Tue, Jul 19 2022 at 09:01:22 PM +02:00:00 +02:00:00, Bartosz Fenski wrote: Hey folks. Anyone interested in switching to some more modern channels of communication? I'm tired of keeping VPS ju

Re: how about telegram channel

2022-07-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, Jul 19 2022 at 09:01:22 PM +02:00:00 +02:00:00, Bartosz Fenski wrote: Hey folks. Anyone interested in switching to some more modern channels of communication? I'm tired of keeping VPS just to have IRC client and to be honest I think modern solutions like Telegram are simply easi

Re:  Re: questionable massive auto-removal: buggy deps nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470

2022-05-29 Thread Pirate Praveen
2022, മേയ് 28 8:42:22 PM IST, Thomas Goirand ൽ എഴുതി >On 5/27/22 09:26, Andreas Tille wrote: >> Am Thu, May 26, 2022 at 08:47:20AM +0200 schrieb Nilesh Patra: >>> Would it be possible to manually remove this item from the list that >>> generates >>> autoremovals? >> >> ... or generate a blackl

Re: Adding epoch to node-markdown-it to correct a wrong upstream version

2022-05-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വ്യാ, മേയ് 19 2022 at 04:39:23 വൈകു -05:00:00 -05:00:00, Richard Laager wrote: On 5/19/22 05:42, Pirate Praveen wrote: So current version in the archive is 22.2.3+dfsg+~12.2.3-1 The fixed version we want is 10.0.0+dfsg+~cs16.6.17-1 I have no dog in this fight as they say, but... How

Adding epoch to node-markdown-it to correct a wrong upstream version

2022-05-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
Hi, While embedding @types/markdown-it in node-markdown-it we made a mistake in calculating the resulting upstream version (since uscan was not working for downloading current version it was calculated manually). So current version in the archive is 22.2.3+dfsg+~12.2.3-1 The fixed version we

Re: Change package source name

2022-05-09 Thread Pirate Praveen
2022, മേയ് 9 5:33:18 PM IST, Yadd ൽ എഴുതി >On 09/05/2022 13:54, Yadd wrote: >> >> >> On 09/05/2022 12:56, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> Quoting Yadd (2022-05-09 12:39:37) I just pushed to experimental node-regenerator (via NEW queue, thanks to ftpmasters!) which replaces two packages s

Re: Keep both images but stop pretending no-free is unofficial

2022-04-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
2022, ഏപ്രിൽ 20 1:52:45 PM IST, Ansgar ൽ എഴുതി >On Wed, 2022-04-20 at 12:55 +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> liberated.computer it is refurbished and some components like wifi >> cards replaced so it works with 100% free software. > >No, it doesn't. It just *hides* the

Re: Keep both images but stop pretending no-free is unofficial

2022-04-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
2022, ഏപ്രിൽ 20 1:14:14 PM IST, Andrey Rahmatullin ൽ എഴുതി >On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 12:55:44PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> >> Similarly, I think it would be reasonable for someone to want to provide >> >> entirely free Debian media along with a libre laptop. >

Re: Firmware - what are we going to do about it?

2022-04-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
2022, ഏപ്രിൽ 19 5:57:46 AM IST, Steve McIntyre ൽ എഴുതി >This tension extends to our installation and live media. As non-free is >officially not considered part of Debian, our official media cannot include >anything from non-free. This has been a deliberate policy for many years. >Instead, we hav

Re: Keep both images but stop pretending no-free is unofficial

2022-04-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
2022, ഏപ്രിൽ 20 2:19:21 AM IST, Bastian Blank ൽ എഴുതി >> Similarly, I think it would be reasonable for someone to want to provide >> entirely free Debian media along with a libre laptop. > >Does this exist in the real world? Which hardware would such a system >contain? liberated.computer it is

Re: chromium: Update to version 94.0.4606.61 (security-fixes)

2022-02-13 Thread Pirate Praveen
2022, ഫെബ്രുവരി 13 9:36:11 PM IST, Roger Shimizu ൽ എഴുതി >On Sat, Feb 12, 2022 at 2:12 AM Andres Salomon wrote: >> Yes, that's the error. "String.matchAll is only available from Node.js >> 12.0 onwards", according to >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58558257/string-matchall-is-undefined >

Re: What are the most important projects that Debian ought to work on?

2022-02-09 Thread Pirate Praveen
On തി, ജനു 24 2022 at 10:31:01 രാവിലെ +0100 +0100, Sébastien Delafond wrote: Hello, As part of an upcoming survey that we are preparing, we plan to ask Debian developers to rank, by order of importance, the most popular ideas of improvements for Debian. However, there's no easy way to ide

Re: Do we need to hide packages in NEW queue

2022-01-31 Thread Pirate Praveen
On തി, ജനു 31 2022 at 10:07:32 രാവിലെ +0100 +0100, Stephan Lachnit wrote: On Sun, Jan 30, 2022 at 8:35 PM Russ Allbery wrote: I do think that the amount of effort that the project puts into this pre-screening is of sufficiently high magnitude that it would be worth paying a lawyer for

Re: The future of src:ntp

2022-01-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
2022, ജനുവരി 19 5:27:28 PM IST, Paride Legovini ൽ എഴുതി >Richard Laager wrote on 19/01/2022: >> On 1/18/22 11:21 AM, Paride Legovini wrote: >> > I'd prefer making ntp a dummy package depending on ntpsec rather than >> > having src:ntpsec takeover bin:ntp. >> >> If I understand correctly, you'

Re: Adding new language/locale to system via a graphical interface

2022-01-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
2022, ജനുവരി 6 2:26:33 PM IST, Wouter Verhelst ൽ എഴുതി >Hi, > >On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 03:29:06PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> >> >> On തി, ജനു 3 2022 at 12:09:10 രാവിലെ +0200 +0200, Peter Pentchev >> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 02:59:26

Re: Adding new language/locale to system via a graphical interface

2022-01-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
On തി, ജനു 3 2022 at 12:09:10 രാവിലെ +0200 +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 02:59:26AM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a way to add a new locale/language to system from gnome (think about gnome on mobile like Purism Librem 5 or Pine Phone). I

Adding new language/locale to system via a graphical interface

2022-01-02 Thread Pirate Praveen
Hi, I'm looking for a way to add a new locale/language to system from gnome (think about gnome on mobile like Purism Librem 5 or Pine Phone). I can do that from a terminal by running dpkg-reconfigure locales but want to provide an easier option to users. Is there a way to force gtk interface

Re: Epoch bump for golang-github-valyala-fasthttp

2021-11-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 12 November 2021 12:38:23 am IST, Guillem Jover wrote: >Hi! > >The golang-github-valyala-fasthttp package used to have date-based >release numbers (current Debian version 20160617-2). Upstream has >since switched to semver (latest upstream version 1.31.0). > >So the version scheme has been r

Re: Not running tests because tests miss source code is not useful

2021-10-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
Draft text for the GR (this is my first time proposing a GR text, so help is welcome to make the text clearer). We should not worry about minified files in main that are (a) only in the source package and not in any binary package, and (b) only used to run tests, not to build the binary packag

Re: Not running tests because tests miss source code is not useful

2021-10-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വെ, ഒക്ടോ 8 2021 at 10:31:16 രാവിലെ +0200 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 10/7/21 11:40 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: On 7 October 2021 3:02:55 am IST, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 10/6/21 6:53 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: [adding -devel] On ബു, ഒക്ടോ 6 2021 at 12:16:07 വൈകു +0200

Re: Not running tests because tests miss source code is not useful

2021-10-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വ്യാ, ഒക്ടോ 7 2021 at 11:43:52 രാവിലെ -0700 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Jonas Smedegaard writes: Right: It is ok to use upstream-provided pre-minified code, as long as that code is DFSG-free, which requires the source of that code must exist in Debian. ...and because that is oft

Re: Not running tests because tests miss source code is not useful

2021-10-07 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 7 October 2021 3:02:55 am IST, Thomas Goirand wrote: >On 10/6/21 6:53 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: >> [adding -devel] >> >> On ബു, ഒക്ടോ 6 2021 at 12:16:07 വൈകു +0200 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard >> wrote: >>> Quoting Yadd (2021-10-06 11:43:40) >>>>

Not running tests because tests miss source code is not useful

2021-10-06 Thread Pirate Praveen
[adding -devel] On ബു, ഒക്ടോ 6 2021 at 12:16:07 വൈകു +0200 +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Quoting Yadd (2021-10-06 11:43:40) On Lu, 04 oct 21, 16:40:48, Bastien Roucari�s wrote: > Source: src:node-lodash > Version: 4.17.21+dfsg+~cs8.31.173-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: do not co

Re: Bug#992692: general: Use https for {deb,security}.debian.org by default

2021-09-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
2021, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 9 4:42:18 AM IST, Michael Stone ൽ എഴുതി >On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 01:09:13PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: >>Enabling https by default quite simply breaks the simple recipe of >>installing auto-apt-proxy. Would you agree with auto-apt-proxy's >>postinst automatically editing your s

Re: Require packages to build without any configured DNS

2021-09-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബു, സെപ്റ്റം 8 2021 at 06:10:56 വൈകു +0300 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Wed, Sep 08, 2021 at 07:57:20PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote: On ബു, സെപ്റ്റം 8 2021 at 04:18:46 വൈകു +0200 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Therefore, I am in the opinion that we should let the package run

Re: Require packages to build without any configured DNS

2021-09-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On ബു, സെപ്റ്റം 8 2021 at 04:18:46 വൈകു +0200 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: Therefore, I am in the opinion that we should let the package run its test as much as possible, especially considering that it's not doing actual network outbound connections. Can't we run these tests as autopkgtest

Re: Finding rough consensus on level of vendoring for large upstreams

2021-09-03 Thread Pirate Praveen
2021, സെപ്റ്റംബർ 3 8:22:51 AM IST, Jonas Smedegaard ൽ എഴുതി >I am very worried about how complex node-* packages in Debian have >become since ftpmasters explicitly stated a not-too-small rule and we >began more aggressively embedding. E.g. version of each embedded >project is hidden by defau

Re: Proposal to create unstable-proposed-updates suite for use during freeze

2021-08-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 20/08/21 7:22 pm, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Well, I meant u-p-u and t-p-u as disconnected suites during freeze. Upload to > u-p-u, stuff passing there migrates to t-p-u. We already have testing-proposed-updates with a different set of rules. See https://wiki.debian.org/TestingProposedUpdates >

Re: Proposal to create unstable-proposed-updates suite for use during freeze

2021-08-20 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 20/08/21 4:51 pm, Nilesh Patra wrote: > Or, instead, if you have a u-p-u suite, and stuff that passes there migrates > to t-p-u, > this could be completely mitigated. No, that will defeat the purpose of freeze. t-p-u is targeted at testing without going via unstable. If this has to happen t

Re: Proposal to create unstable-proposed-updates suite for use during freeze

2021-08-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:14 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote: Nilesh Patra wrote: Using experimental directly is risky as it can have changes not ready for unstable also. No. Enabling experimental in your sources.list doesn't actually change anything. You have to explicitly request installing

Re: Debian choice of upstream tarballs for packaging

2021-08-17 Thread Pirate Praveen
2021, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 17 12:18:00 PM IST, Paul Wise ൽ എഴുതി >On Mon, Aug 16, 2021 at 8:25 PM Pirate Praveen wrote: > >> Many node modules don't tag their releases so its really hard to get >> exact source code corresponding to an npmjs.com release. > >It is probably wort

Proposal to create unstable-proposed-updates suite for use during freeze

2021-08-17 Thread Pirate Praveen
Hi, Problem: Currently uploading new upstream versions to unstable during freeze is discouraged. It means users using unstable don't get new updates and developers are forced to upload to experimental. Using experimental directly is risky as it can have changes not ready for unstable also. Prop

Re: Debian choice of upstream tarballs for packaging

2021-08-16 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 17/08/21 1:43 am, Sean Whitton wrote: > I agree with this, and already do it for all or almost all of the > packages I maintain. There will probably need to be lots of exceptions, > however. Many node modules don't tag their releases so its really hard to get exact source code corresponding

Re: Steam Deck: good news for Linux gaming, bad news for Debian :(

2021-08-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
2021, ഓഗസ്റ്റ് 12 8:51:55 AM IST, Timothy M Butterworth ൽ എഴുതി >I am fine with Debian's release cycle but It would be nice to see more >packages. For example Debian is missing KDE's Amarok music manager. I >am happy to see Debian 11 gained KDE Elisa music manager. I am sad to >see that Virtual

Bug#991260: ITP: node-dompurify -- DOM-only, super-fast, uber-tolerant XSS sanitizer

2021-07-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : node-dompurify Version : 2.3.0 Upstream Author : Mario Heiderich (https://cure53.de/) * URL : https://github.com/cure53/DOMPurify * License : (MPL-2.0 OR Apache-2.0

Bug#989747: ITP: node-postcss-loader -- PostCSS loader for webpack

2021-06-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : node-postcss-loader Version : 6.1.0 Upstream Author : Andrey Sitnik * URL : https://github.com/webpack-contrib/postcss-loader * License : Expat Programming Lang: JavaScript

Re: Reconsider sending ITP bugs to debian-devel: a new list?

2021-06-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 11:17 am, Jonathan Dowland wrote: Hi, ITP bugs are copied to debian-devel@. The intention, I think, is to make sure that they have many eyes on them. ITP bugs often get feedback from readers of debian-devel. I think this is valuable. However, it's one job/task/r

Bug#989717: ITP: node-postcss-preset-evergreen -- postcss preset for modern css syntaxes

2021-06-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : node-postcss-preset-evergreen Version : 0.2.1 Upstream Author : Eric Chen * URL : https://github.com/best-shot/postcss-preset-evergreen * License : Expat Programming Lang

Bug#988941: ITP: node-rollup-plugin-sass -- Rollup plugin for .sass files

2021-05-21 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : node-rollup-plugin-sass Version : 1.2.2 Upstream Author : BinRui.Guan * URL : https://github.com/differui/rollup-plugin-sass#readme * License : Expat Programming Lang

Bug#988506: ITP: node-terser-webpack-plugin -- Terser plugin for webpack

2021-05-14 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Control: block 980316 by -1 * Package name : node-terser-webpack-plugin Version : 3.1.0 Upstream Author : webpack Contrib Team * URL : https://github.com/webpack-contrib/terser-webpack-plugin

Bug#979576: ITP: node-babel-plugin-lodash -- Modular Lodash builds without the hassle

2021-01-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : node-babel-plugin-lodash Version : 3.3.4 Upstream Author : Graeme Yeates (https://github.com/megawac) * URL : https://github.com/lodash/babel-plugin-lodash#readme * License

Re: How should we handle greenbone-security-assistant?

2020-12-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Dec 18, 2020 at 8:59 am, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Pirate Praveen wrote: > - ensurance that we use DFSG free code only > => we can have tool to review licenses of what has been > downloaded during build and embedded in the binary packages Then

Re: How should we handle greenbone-security-assistant?

2020-12-17 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 2:55 pm, Raphael Hertzog wrote: I know this, but I also know that such an analysis is very time-consuming and needs a good knowledge of the language and of the upstream package, which I don't have. Most of the time Semantic Versioning works (https://semver.org) s

Re: How should we handle greenbone-security-assistant?

2020-12-17 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 2:19 pm, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hello, On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, Pirate Praveen wrote: >1/ download all the node modules and add them to the source package, but >then it's just impossible to write a copyright file to document the source >package. Tha

Re: How should we handle greenbone-security-assistant?

2020-12-16 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ഡിസംബർ 16 11:57:04 PM IST, Raphael Hertzog wrote: >Hello, > >in the pkg-security team we have greenbone-security-assistant (gsa) >which is a web interface for gvm (former openvas-manager), the >version currently in Debian no longer works with the latest gvm >so we have to update it to

Bug#977200: ITP: node-miragejs -- client-side server to build, test and demo JavaScript apps

2020-12-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : node-miragejs Version : 0.1.41 Upstream Author : Sam Selikoff * URL : https://github.com/miragejs/miragejs * License : Expat Programming Lang: JavaScript Description : client

Bug#977197: ITP: node-route-recognizer -- library that matches paths against registered routes

2020-12-12 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : node-route-recognizer Version : 0.3.4 Upstream Author : Yehuda Katz * URL : https://github.com/tildeio/route-recognizer * License : Expat Programming Lang: JavaScript

Bug#977144: ITP: node-inflected -- port of ActiveSupport's inflector to Node.js

2020-12-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : node-inflected Version : 2.1.0 Upstream Author : Martin Andert * URL : https://github.com/martinandert/inflected#readme * License : Expat Programming Lang: JavaScript

MiniDebConf India 2021: Call for Proposals

2020-12-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 [sorry if you got another copy earlier, it seems pgp/mime is not recognized by the lists as signed mail and I had to use an older version of thunderbird with enigmail to get inline pgp working] Dear Debianites, The MiniDebConf India Content team wo

MiniDebConf India 2021: Call for Proposals

2020-12-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
[resending with correct signature, sorry for duplicate message] Dear Debianites, The MiniDebConf India Content team would like to call for proposals for the MiniDebConf India 2021[1] conference, which will take place online, from January 23rd to 24th, 2021. # Introduction MiniDebConf India, orga

MiniDebConf India 2021: Call for Proposals

2020-12-10 Thread Pirate Praveen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Dear Debianites, The MiniDebConf India Content team would like to call for proposals for the MiniDebConf India 2021[1] conference, which will take place online, from January 23rd to 24th, 2021. # Introduction MiniDebConf India, organised by the

Bug#974862: ITP: golang-gocloud -- The Go Cloud Development Kit (Go CDK)

2020-11-15 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org * Package name : golang-gocloud Version : 0.20.0-1 Upstream Author : The Go Cloud Development Kit Authors * URL : https://github.com/google/go-cloud * License

Re: Split Packages files based on new section "buildlibs"

2020-11-15 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 19:28, Tomas Pospisek wrote: This solution seems to be too trivial that nobody would have though of it, so what is it that I (and I guess many Debianers) are missing? *t Additionally these libraries change too fast and most of the time, there is no long term suppo

Bug#974753: ITP: golang-honnef-go-tools -- Collection of golang tools and libraries

2020-11-14 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org * Package name : golang-honnef-go-tools Version : 2020.1-1 Upstream Author : Dominik Honnef * URL : https://github.com/dominikh/go-tools * License : Expand

Re: Hosting the original youtube-dl sources on salsa?

2020-10-30 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ഒക്‌ടോബർ 30 1:46:21 PM IST, Philip Hands wrote: >We could presumably consult a lawyer, but the RIAA would need to be even >more moronic than I think they are to have a go at us, given that nobody >in the wider world has ever heard of us, and we're going to have no >trouble raising fund

Re: How does one package a multirepo project?

2020-10-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 12:15, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: To strip upstream content completely from Debian redistribution, use Files-Excluded-foo: in topmost section of debian/copyright - see jsbundle-web-interfaces for an example of that. To strip upstream content from entering the Debian git

Re: How does one package a multirepo project?

2020-10-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, Oct 19, 2020 at 11:51, Julien Puydt wrote: Here is what I have in d/control for my src:lumino experiments : Provides: node-lumino-algorithm (= 1.3.3), node-lumino-application (= 1.11.0), node-lumino-collections (= 1.3.3), node-lumino-commands (= 1.11.3)

Re: How does one package a multirepo project?

2020-10-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ഒക്‌ടോബർ 19 12:45:28 PM IST, Julien Puydt wrote: >Hi, > >I was trying to update the ipywidgets package. It once had a quite >normal upstream, but then things went wild, if not stellar : they went >monorepo. ... >So basically my question is the one in the mail subject : how does one >p

Bug#971020: ITP: node-rollup-plugin-inject -- Scan modules for global variables and inject import statements

2020-09-26 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Control: block 970550 by -1 * Package name : node-rollup-plugin-inject Version : 3.0.2 Upstream Author : Rich Harris * URL : https://github.com/rollup/rollup-plugin-inject#readme * License

Re: DAM Key and identity requirements

2020-09-24 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:34, Bastian Blank wrote: * An encryption subkey must be present, since various parts of our infrastructure require it. Which parts? While encryption subkeys are useful, I can't see anything _requiring_ this. As part of NM process, some details are sent

Bug#970786: ITP: node-bootstrap-switch -- Turn checkboxes and radio buttons into toggle switches

2020-09-23 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org Control: block 836439 by -1 * Package name : node-bootstrap-switch Version : 3.4.0 Upstream Author : Mattia Larentis (http://larentis.eu) * URL : https://bttstrp.github.io/bootstrap-switch

Re: Preferred form of modification for binary data used in unit testing?

2020-07-17 Thread Pirate Praveen
On 2020, ജൂലൈ 17 8:14:24 PM IST, Marvin Renich wrote: >[This was just a convenient point in the thread to which to reply; it's >not really a reply to Sean's specific message.] > >I think, instead of pedantically applying the wording of the DFSG, we >should be pedantically applying the intended

Re: Preferred form of modification for binary data used in unit testing?

2020-07-16 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 12:28, Christian Kastner wrote: On 2020-07-15 09:45, Philipp Hahn wrote: if a *previous* version of a software generated a *buggy* binary database, that bug got fixed in a *newer* version and also some *recovery* mechanism was added to allow reading that broken for

Re: Source only upload

2020-07-14 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 15:55, Michael Meskes wrote: Hi, I just fell into the trap (again) and uploaded a binary package instead of sources only. We don't want the binaries to be uploaded, that much I get, but could anyone please explain to me, why we still accept binary uploads and why n

Bug#963505: ITP: golang-github-otiai10-copy -- Golang copy directory recursively

2020-06-22 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org * Package name : golang-github-otiai10-copy Version : 1.2.0-1 Upstream Author : Hiromu OCHIAI * URL : https://github.com/otiai10/copy * License : Expat Programming

Bug#960944: ITP: node-less-loader -- Less loader for webpack which compiles Less to CSS with webpack description

2020-05-18 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : node-less-loader Version : 4.1.0 Upstream Author : Johannes Ewald @jhnns * URL : https://github.com/webpack-contrib/less-loader * License : Expat Programming Lang: JavaScript

Bug#960300: ITP: node-mini-css-extract-plugin -- extracts CSS into separate files

2020-05-11 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : node-mini-css-extract-plugin Version : 0.5.0 Upstream Author : Tobias Koppers @sokra * URL : https://github.com/webpack-contrib/mini-css-extract-plugin * License : Expat

Re: Is there any way to refuse Janitor changes in team git?

2020-04-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 7:05 pm, Andreas Tille wrote: Hi, from time to time purely random packages (recently ctdconverter) recive changes by janitor in Git. I consider this totally useless in the case of Debian Med team maintained packages. We are usually calling routine-update before u

Bug#958033: ITP: golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate -- SQL schema migration tool for Go

2020-04-17 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org * Package name : golang-github-rubenv-sql-migrate Version : 0.0~git20191213.0633851-1 Upstream Author : Ruben Vermeersch * URL : https://github.com/rubenv/sql-migrate

Bug#956906: ITP: golang-gopkg-gorp.v1 -- Go Relational Persistence - an ORM-ish library for Go

2020-04-16 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian...@lists.debian.org * Package name : golang-gopkg-gorp.v1 Version : 1.7.2-1 Upstream Author : * URL : https://github.com/go-gorp/gorp * License : Expat Programming Lang: Go Description

Bug#954251: ITP: node-rollup-plugin-terser -- Rollup plugin to minify generated es bundle

2020-03-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Pirate Praveen X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name : node-rollup-plugin-terser Version : 5.3.0 Upstream Author : Bogdan Chadkin * URL : https://github.com/TrySound/rollup-plugin-terser * License : Expat Programming Lang

Source-only upload and build profiles

2020-01-17 Thread Pirate Praveen
Hi, I tried uploading node-webpack with DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=nocheck sbuild -s --source-only-changes https://tracker.debian.org/news/1094664/accepted-node-webpack-4300-2-source-into-experimental/ But it seems the buildd did not consider Built-For-Profiles: nocheck in the source.changes file. I

Re: Migration to testing blocked by broken piuparts?

2020-01-08 Thread Pirate Praveen
On വ്യാ, Jan 2, 2020 at 21:43, debacle wrote: On 2020-01-02 11:53, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: El jue., 2 ene. 2020 08:28, Julien Cristau escribió: > No, it'll eventually get retried and (assuming it passes) the migration > block will lift. And "eventually" is normall

  1   2   3   4   5   >