u cannot use an anonymous type as a template argument.
One option would be to make wrap take an int always, if that's
feasible. Or long. Or unsigned versions of those.
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ces of these
> terms in each header.
What is this 'use'? C++ doesn't have that as a keyword. Do you mean
'using'?
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
collect when nothing depends on such
a package? That would solve the problem with Uninstall-with: foo when
another package suddenly needs the data package.
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ed a new field for that purpose that only has effect on uninstalls, like
Uninstall-with: foo
If the purpose was to make foo installed when a user installs foo-data
himself, then Recommend instead.
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
other dir / another name of the file? Again, what's
the use
3) this is a library so it only has a .so file with another soname so
no name clashes. Hey, oops, different library soname already means a
different package (this, I think, is the reason why rpm supports
multiple versions)
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
matter of time.) Isn't one of our
> strenghts that we can automate what we can so we can use our time for all
> those tasks that are left?
Good idea! Let's make a new repository of packages that only
receives new packages that have their dependencies fulfilled.
We need a good name fo
to `/etc/lsb-release' too.
The admin might also modify /etc/passwd. Does this make /etc/passwd a
bad place to specify user accounts?
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 07:35:35PM +0100, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> Version : x.y.z
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.example.org/
> * License : (GPL, LGPL, BSD, MIT/X, etc.)
Didn't feel the need to fil
e. But
that's not the case for everyone's pet arch, from what I've been
reading on the list. So much posts about "suddenly dropping
so-and-so many users and machines and whatnot" cannot mean
anything else.
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
itable to be included
in Debian.
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
now are not many people and they are not representative
> of the user base in any way.
Those who want to use the aa backend can use -vo sdl:aa if
libsdl1.2debian-all is installed (and the mplayer package is compiled
with sdl support).
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
relevant info is right there.
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
nfrastructure? Focus on that if you want a release happening. Or the
~100 RC bugs still left. gtk+ build failing because lack of disk space
makes some things go slower, but it's not like Sarge is released the
moment gtk+ is built. It's not the bottleneck.
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ay release.
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
dback (-fprofile-arcs) or
__builtin_expect. This means that different runs of the compiler on
the same program
may produce different object code.
Also, the first 16 bytes will differ in an ELF format .o, see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/09/msg00201.htm
ion should also tell the admin what the package does.
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Using ifconfig or iwconfig or other tools to do it is a better way.
But guessing from the name is made easier by naming the interfaces
appropriately. The physical widgets even look different.
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
break any
POSIX-following tools.
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
for not using the user:group notation. chown
could print a warning when the dot notation is used.
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
upid.
>
> Exactly. Especially since almose everybody has a program called browser
> installed which can be used to download all kinds of stuff...
But the difference here is that with a browser you must _deliberately_
search for "all kinds of stuff"...
--
Petri Latvala
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
ginal question is valid.
--
Petri Latvala
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tream version without being a particular debian
> revision.
>
> Any suggestions for the best approach?
With that approach, it's impossible to install several different
versions. Or several programs that each depend on a different version of
libgeda.
The best approach is to just liv
s not provide for a
> program menu including additional metadata, instead using certain well-known
> directories that you browse in a file manager.
Executable names (or other file names) and Debian package names can
differ. Or does an OpenStep-compliant system search the dpkg database?
--
Petri Latvala
23 matches
Mail list logo
