On 26/04/16 15:43, Peter Lebbing wrote:
> I will post this to the list, though.
It was brought to my attention this also goes to debian-devel. This was
never my intention; I constantly misread that as gnupg-devel. If I had
known this was going to debian-devel I would have long removed it from
On 26/04/16 15:05, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> Please keep the discussion technical. If you don't agree with me
> this is fine. But when you express your opinion about my lack of
> modesty, this is getting personal.
This is not true: you are taking the word modesty out of the context I
used it in.
>
On 26/04/16 14:23, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> Peter, I already know your opinion on my project and my modesty,
> you don't have to bash every message that I write.
Quote or it didn't happen. I think I've treated you respectfully, though
I already noted my first reply to your first message here could
On 26/04/16 12:52, Dashamir Hoxha wrote:
> A project similar in goals (simplifying GnuPG by automating tasks and
> emphasising best practices) is this one: https://github.com/dashohoxha/egpg
> You can find the answer to some of the questions above by looking at its
> code.
I think you are taking t
4 matches
Mail list logo
