On 10/03/2025 09:57, Simon Josefsson wrote:
in a Salsa pipeline, and that seems to be a 5-10GB
artifact unless my math is off.
Hi Simon,
sadly, Salsa pipelines will only handle up to 250MB,
a long way short of even 5GB !
https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/-/issues/389
Che
On 14/02/2025 22:10, Iustin Pop wrote:
Hi,
I have a package that, in the extract source step, generates very large
"artifacts" - I guess this is the actual source code. And this fails, of
course (https://salsa.debian.org/debian/doc-rfc/-/jobs/7091134):
I raised an issue for this here
https://
Hi Mike,
dosemu is in the archive and snapshot.
Rather long links I'm afraid!
http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/debian/pool/contrib/d/dosemu/dosemu_1.4.0.7+20130105+b028d3f-2+b1_amd64.deb
https://snapshot.debian.org/archive/debian-archive/20240331T102506Z/debian/pool/contrib/d/dosemu/dos
On 25/10/2024 11:49, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
If my understanding is correct, then it sounds wrong for DDs to be
granted access to all Salsa projects.
Hi Jonas,
I was not thinking of all Salsa projects,
but those that represent official packages.
Cheers,
Peter
On 24/10/2024 21:36, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
Hi,
I occasionally run into the situation that a package has been NMU'd or
otherwise updated directly into the Debian repositories,
bypassing/ignoring that a packaging git repository existed.
Hi Otto,
Are any of these packages team maintained?
I un
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Peter
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, pe...@pblackman.plus.com,
pkg-pascal-de...@alioth-lists.debian.net
* Package name : libqt6pas
Version : 1
Upstream Contact: N/A (See URL below)
* URL : https://www.lazarus-ide
On 28/08/2024 03:13, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
## Performance and Reliability
Multiple participants, including Salvo Tomaselli, Johannes Schauer
Marin Rodrigues, Andrea Pappacoda, and Gioele Barabucci, complained
about Salsa/GitLab being slow or unreliable at times, which deterred
contribution. Imp
On 14/07/2024 16:54, Maytham Alsudany wrote:
Hi,
Ping for further feedback or seconds for proposed policy change to
clarify and document the use of the Static-Built-Using field.
Hi Maytham,
could also mention that this field would be useful for fpc & lazarus
packages.
https://bugs.debian.or
On 10/01/2024 07:20, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
Hi!
Is anybody aware if there is some kind of static analyzer for the
`debian/rules` file?
Not being aware of such a tool, I usually run 'debuild -S'
Much faster than a full build.
On 25/09/2023 14:25, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
So putting a Control: line in the pseudo-header of a message sent to
###-d...@bugs.debian.org doesn't work at all?
It should work if the syntax is correct. The + character was missing.
On 25/09/2023 12:16, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
Hi all,
I recently tried to close a bug, explain why, and set a "wontfix" tag all at once by sending my explanation to
###-d...@bugs.debian.org with "Control: tags ### wontfix" as the first line of my message body. The bug was closed but
the tags co
On 20/06/2023 05:31, Joachim Zobel wrote:
I can see two logs of successful builds and a
diff for them.
Looks to me like the 2nd build is aborting.
..
I: Building the package
I: user script /srv/workspace/pbuilder/1086848/tmp/hooks/A99_set_merged_usr
starting
Re-configuring usrmerge
On 30/11/2022 14:03, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
Hi,
I am unable to succesfully dput packages. Most likely the cause is my
too late updating my PGP key expiry date - but that should be solved by
now, and I am unable to figure out how to debug the problem or whom to
contact about it.
I patiently wa
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, pe...@pblackman.plus.com
Owner: pe...@pblackman.plus.com
* Package name : qt6ct
Version : 0.5-1
Upstream Author : Ilya Kotov
* URL : https://github.com/trialuser02/qt6ct
* License : B
On 08/19/2014 12:45 PM, Clément Bœsch wrote:
> See:
> http://fate.ffmpeg.org/
> http://coverage.ffmpeg.org/
The 2nd link to "coverage" (which should show the LCOV output, I guess)
seems to be broken:
I get a "404 Not Found" :(
Regards,
Pb
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.
On 08/08/2014 09:22 PM, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> We'd also benefit from the fact that Upstream tends to use FFmpeg. I'd
> hate to report some intractable codec bug which Upstream closes with
> an "it works with FFmpeg" comment
Oh, btw, just a few days ago, that's exactly what happened on kdenlive
16 matches
Mail list logo