gt; > instructions?
> Generic instructions: https://mentors.debian.net/intro-maintainers
> Reintroducing packages:
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/ch05.en.html#reintroducing-pkgs
Thank you!
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
back into Debian, what
would I need to do? I haven't been a package maintainer before. I
presume there's a document somewhere I can read with detailed
instructions?
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 17:52:14 +0200 Martin Bagge / brother
wrote:
> On 2016-08-23 17:14, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > I've tried searching BTS for references to CVE-2016-5696 (the
> > recent Linux TCP injection vulnerability) and I've come up empty.
> > Is there cur
I've tried searching BTS for references to CVE-2016-5696 (the recent
Linux TCP injection vulnerability) and I've come up empty. Is there
currently a bug in the system that is tracking fixes for it?
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
he NM and DM processes require only one signature. Why is it
> > harder to replace a key than to become a DD?
>
> Or rather, why the requirements for the first key any weaker than
> those for DD key replacement?
Or rather, what is the specific threat that the policy is designed to
y will find
inconvenient, I would suggest worrying more about the process that
assures that what is being signed is in fact safe, and that keys are
not being misused. Several attacks against Windows recently have
involved stolen keys (note, stolen, not cracked) and I doubt Debian's
average key i
where things go, etc.) even though
/usr is long since obsolete, while dealing with people's emotional
reaction to the "necessity" of /usr wastes lots of time and causes ill
feeling.
Still, /usr has been obsolete for decades, and if I were starting over
again today, with a brand
On Sun, 15 Aug 2010 16:00:23 -0700 Steve Langasek
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 06:30:04PM -0400, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > By the early 1990s this was long since unneeded but people
> > continued to do it anyway, and in fact started to think it was
> > done for technica
st modern Unix systems would be fine if all files in /usr were in /,
with a compatibility symlink pointing /usr at / to provide for scripts
and other programs assuming things to be in /usr, but no one dares to
do it, because the "Onion" impulse is so strong.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzger
9 matches
Mail list logo
