Hello David and others,
Op 25-05-2022 om 20:30 schreef David Kalnischkies:
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:33:22AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
I support many people with Debian, what I often see is that they remove a
package, and then also the meta-package is removed. And later all
dependencies
uld be nice to have the possibility to remove them individually.
I support many people with Debian, what I often see is that they remove
a package, and then also the meta-package is removed. And later all
dependencies of the meta-package are removed by accident.
Just my 2 cents...
Wi
Op 23-04-2022 om 23:30 schreef Andrey Rahmatullin:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 10:48:03PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
I have an idea for an extra option:
6. Put the closed source firmware somewhere in the Debian images, but never
install closed source firmware by default. "No" sho
Op 23-04-2022 om 16:10 schreef Andrey Rahmatullin:
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 03:13:29PM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
I see several possible options that the images team can choose from here.
However, several of these options could undermine the principles of Debian. We
don't want to
ould also be an
non-default choice, even when you install closed source firmware.
Maybe there could also be a patch, what removes the closed-source
firmware from the image.
With regards,
Paul
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://vandervlis.nl
Op 26-12-16 om 23:44 schreef Paul Wise:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 12:35 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>
>> I use a script on a few servers to realize this, it's not perfect:
>> http://vandervlis.nl/files/updateafter
>
> It might be interesting to contribute this to un
Op 25-12-16 om 01:43 schreef Paul Wise:
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>
>> I am doing this myself already on desktop systems so I have some
>> experiences with it.
>
> Thanks for sharing your experience.
>
>> What I would really l
Op 25-12-16 om 06:36 schreef Samuel Thibault:
> Paul van der Vlis, on Sun 25 Dec 2016 01:34:15 +0100, wrote:
>> I would like it when
>> desktop users could get a message that programms has to be restarted.
>> Not sure this is important for servers too, I would think so.
>
I don't think it's an good idea to enable automatic reboots by default.
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer Groningen
https://www.vandervlis.nl/
really fast.
Another point are virtual machines. Does Gnome 3.12 work fine inside
many virtual machines?
Does Gnome 3.12 work on LTSP?
Gnome 3.12 depends on GDM3 when I am not wrong. After some timeout GDM3
comes into a mode where a user who don't know how it works does not find
a way
for the day we can
> realistically do video playing on the virtual desktop across a WAN.
X2go-server is not Windows-only, it even does not run on Windows.
Not sure what you want to say.
With regards,
Paul.
--
Paul van der Vlis Linux systeembeheer, Groningen
http://www.vandervlis.nl
--
amd64
version), I don't saw stability problems. I would like to help test them
better, but I need some help: my xenbr device does not start.
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
http://www.vandervlis.nl/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My first message was refused because it was to long. Another try...
Bastian Blank schreef:
> > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:52:09AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>> >> I have it running on my amd64 machine!
> >
> > Okay.
I use now the try4 packages (amd64) on the
Bastian Blank schreef:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:20:19AM +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>> Bastian Blank schreef:
>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:57:40PM -0300, André Luís Lopes wrote:
>>>> Bastian Blank escreveu:
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:52:
1-xen-amd64_2.6.26-6_amd64.deb
> | 07ef8c3b6c4e2496afd3fc86347f5cf640a644f9
> xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-686_2.6.26-6_i386.deb
> | ddfd7db322b8540cb0f606f974758e883d416a67
> xen-linux-system-2.6.26-1-xen-amd64_2.6.26-6_amd64.deb
Great that there seems to be a amd64 po
t still does not work at the moment )
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
http://www.vandervlis.nl/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the team is very late with
it. Too late when Lenny is in time, in my opinion.
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
http://www.vandervlis.nl/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
64.git
http://git.et.redhat.com/?p=linux-2.6-fedora-pvops.git;a=summary
http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/rpms/kernel-xen-2.6/devel/
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/10/Schedule
Eventually we could support the Etch-kernel in Lenny until there is
another solution?
Maybe we could make
ory
> daemon", and thus will never be in debian. At most, in non-free.
There is a new driver what does not need the daemon:
http://intellinuxwireless.org/?p=iwlwifi
http://kerneltrap.org/node/7704
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
http://www.vandervlis.nl/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
bian.org/debian-devel/2007/01/msg00094.html
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
http://www.vandervlis.nl/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Loïc Minier schreef:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2006, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>
>>I don't like the fact that I need to recompile the kernel to get a
>>bootsplash. I don't ask for a bootsplash by default, but I would like a
>>way to enable it with a standard kernel.
Miriam Ruiz schreef:
> gensplash and fbsplash might be an option to consider too:
>
> http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_fbsplash
Interesting...
>From the site: http://dev.gentoo.org/~spock/projects/gensplash/
---
This means that if you don't care about having an image in the
background of yo
Paul Wise schreef:
> On Wed, 2006-06-14 at 13:41 +0200, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
>
>
>>I don't like the fact that I need to recompile the kernel to get a
>>bootsplash. I don't ask for a bootsplash by default, but I would like a
>>way to enable it with a
Jérôme Warnier schreef:
> Le mercredi 14 juin 2006 à 13:41 +0200, Paul van der Vlis a écrit :
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I don't like the fact that I need to recompile the kernel to get a
>>bootsplash. I don't ask for a bootsplash by default, but I would like a
&
t in using Debian for "normal people".
Is there a good reason not to include the bootsplash?
Who is making the dicision in questions like this?
How can I ask for such a dicision?
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
Hello,
During install my videocard is not detected by Debconf. It is a cheap
Nvidia compatible videocard what uses the "nv" driver.
How can I tell the Discover-developpers about this videocard?
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
BTW: This is from "lspci -vv"
-
:01
move the
latest problems, and then call it "stable".
But maybe I see it to easy...
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Schulze schreef:
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
At least that's been the case including sarge. Hence, such
a sentence would not mean anything.
I can understand something like "Debian releases when it's ready", but
many people have to work together. Maybe it's
Martin Schulze schreef:
Paul van der Vlis wrote:
Hello,
One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
takes for a new stable version.
What about saying something like: the next stable release comes in the
beginning of 2006?
The release date for a Debian release is not
people have to work together. Maybe it's better to say: "a package
releases when it's ready, but the deadline for the next Debian release
is a fixed date".
You will understand that my most important point is security-support.
With regards,
Paul van der Vlis.
30 matches
Mail list logo
