On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:30:53PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 01:43:46PM +0000, Paul M Sargent wrote:
> >
> > ...but a distribution is designed for a particular kernel. e.g. slink is
> > designed for 2.0.x with some packages for 2.2.x suppor
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 09:08:43AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> >
> > Woody should be running 2.3 or pre-2.4. That should have been among the
> > first
> > things to change.
> >
>
> We are knee deep in a release cycle. We should not be expending our
> resources on woody right now.
Ohh, Agreed.
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 02:50:12PM +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 11:50:47AM +0000, Paul M Sargent wrote:
> > Woody should be running 2.3 or pre-2.4. That should have been among the
> > first things to change.
>
> There's a misunderstanding her
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 09:53:41PM -, Steve Greenland wrote:
> Which is it? Do your friends want the newest bleeding edge stuff, or
> do they want stability? They can't have both at the same time! Oh, I
> see, the want the newest, but they want us to call it "stable".
OK, Here's a question th
4 matches
Mail list logo
