S in order to know how much work has
>> been achieved, but still no news.
>
> You should actually double check with Paul Hedderly who is responsible
> for it; you'd also want to Cc: them directly, since they won't get
> information on those bugs unless they're subscr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Paul Hedderly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gibak
Version : 0.3.0
Upstream Author : Mauricio Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://eigenclass.org/hiki/gibak-backup-system-introduction
* License
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 07:38:47PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 01:58:15PM -0300, Humberto Massa Guimar?es wrote:
>
> > And to boot, an e-mail calling for curriculae for a recruiting party
> > is on-topic to a DEVELOPERS list
>
> No. This is why the debian-jobs list exi
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 02:37:59PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>
> Yeah; vi not behaving like vi by default seems like a showstopper.
But that is not the case. vi by default not acting like a very old and
(imho) broken version of vi... is not a showstopper.
I love vi - and I love the progress vi
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 08:56:42PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
>
> I'm one of the people who prefers nvi over vim. I do so quite strongly,
> because I find that nvi obeys my fingers and vim does not. The
Sounds like you should file a bug against your fingers then.
> differences are minute, of c
My biggest problem with all this is that it's gonna mean a lot of work -
for the 'declassifying team' and for people who want to be bothered
about commenting on the process is respect of particular email. Thats
time that I feel could be better spent.
I do understand the motives...
--
Paul
On Thu
On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 05:33:50PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Paul Hedderly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > What we have is source code (yes code that can be compiled) which is
> > unencumbered, we can modify,compile, distribute etc... whether it is
> > _ha
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 07:31:22AM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Henning Makholm writes:
> > Yes, but we shouldn't act as if it was a _freedom_ problem.
>
> If it was deliberately made bloody horribly ugly and painful in order to
> make changing it difficult, it's a freedom problem.
Not really. How
I can happily provide two Sun SS20's , one or two U1's and an Acorn RiscPC
to help build ARM and Sparc. I'd happily give them a basic install, provide
broadband
access to them and hand over control to the buildd team.
--
Paul
On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 08:43:40PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
>
On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 01:44:27AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> "Julian Mehnle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Brian May wrote:
> > > I have tried debian-installer, and found it to be great!
> > >
> > > I just have three feature requests, if they aren't already supported:
> > > [...]
>
On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 08:31:47PM -0400, Jim Penny wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 01:38:45 +0200
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Domenico Andreoli) wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 05:38:51PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > [ObPrivate: this doesn't belong on private. Quote me freely.]
> > >
> > > On W
On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 01:01:14AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Thanks to Matt Zimmerman and Joe Drew, apt-listchanges will now display
> NEWS.Debian entries for upgraded packages. They're displayed before the
> regular changelog entries, and Matt plans to later let it be configured
> to only display
On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 07:59:49PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
>
> I have a package ready that allows ifupdown to do much more magic.
> That package is in use for one and a half years at the site I work
> for, but it needs the patch (better said, the current version of that
> patch) from Bug #88948 a
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 03:17:21AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Peter Hicks wrote:
> > well, I would hate to dissuade you from packaging the linux-wlan
> > drivers, but I have no trouble using prism2, orinoco, or cisco aironet
> > cards with the stock debian 2.4.18 kernel. Both my lucent card and my
>
On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 12:01:10AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:30:20AM +0300, Lasse Karkkainen <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> was heard to say:
> > I guess you didn't read my original message: the problem is that I know
> > next to nothing about Debian.
>
> Yes, that sums
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 10:12:28AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> Did YOU help introducing ANY new features in boot-floppies? I18n? Kernel
> 2.4, other filesystems, RAID support, lots of bugfixes in the existing
> code, etc. etc.? Either you can continue your mission of distruction,
> or you stop
On Mon, Jan 01, 2001 at 11:37:17AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> -- Ferret
>
> Who recalls a cddb access program designed for blind people where
> cddb.com DENIED a certification because the program couldn't display a
> graphical logo where the blind people could see it.
Presumably no blind p
17 matches
Mail list logo
