Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 07:39:04AM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 02:33:27PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote: > > On the other hand, I'm having a problem with the package, it > > doesn't include muttng_dotlock, and seems to think my mailspool > > (

Re: Bug#301081: ITP: mutt-ng -- Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt

On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:53:38PM +0100, Per Olofsson wrote: > Elimar Riesebieter: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Package name: mutt-ng > Also note that Norbert Tretkowski has already created a mutt-ng > package, although he d

Re: How to pin certain packages from experimental?

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 12:36:52PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:47:22 +0100, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >* Marc Haber [Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:03:21 +0100]: > >> | Version Table: > >> | 4.50-4 555 > >> |500 http://debian.debian.zugschlus.de sid/main P

Re: Emulated buildds (for SCC architectures)?

On Sat, Mar 19, 2005 at 08:21:18PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Karsten Merker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 06:58:50PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > > Peter 'p2' De Schrijver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > A much faster solution would be to use dis

Re: Another load of typos

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:05:02PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 09:04:14AM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > > Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > (This might be a topic without a possible conclusion!) > > > Funny, but although I'd say "an HTML file" or "a

Re: Another load of typos

On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 11:20:12PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 10:59:34AM +, Will Newton wrote: > > On Thursday 17 March 2005 03:16, Florian Zumbiehl wrote: > > > ... and probably not for (that is, not unless you tell me otherwise): > > > > HPGL > > > > HTML > > > >

Re: Another load of typos

On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 05:32:10AM +0100, Florian Zumbiehl wrote: > HPGL > HTML > HTTPS These three vary because the letter H is pronounced starting with either a 'h' (haich) or an 'a' (aich). This is _probably_ a distinction between American and British English, although it was originally a disti

Re: automake/autoconf in build-dependencies

On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 01:18:12AM -0500, Kurt B. Kaiser wrote: > Machine generated files (e.g. configure) constructed by autotools > should not be in CVS. > However, these files (as generated by the Debian maintainer's autotools > run before the upload) should be included in the source package vi

Re: Serious kernel problems on new i386 hardware

On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 12:51:16PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Jesús Roncero wrote: > > >I've recently had those problems also on a Dell server, using SATA too. The > >fine guys from #gpul helped me a lot on this. Basically, what happened to > >me > >is that kernel 2.4 mapp

Re: automake/autoconf in build-dependencies

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:52:45PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote: > I have often tried to argue my position on automake/autoconf in > packages' build dependencies: I do not think they belong there. If > a package does not build without automake or autoconf, it is broken > and should be fixed. Howeve

Re: Serious kernel problems on new i386 hardware

On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 03:10:12PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > I've got a new Dell machine which I was able to install with Kernel 2.4.27. > It has a SATA drive but I disabled SATA in BIOS according to the manuals. > All I write in the following has this SATA disabled BIOS setting. > As I

Re: Shouldn't kernel-image-2.6.x-y-z depend on alsa-base ?

On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 12:01:47PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le samedi 05 mars 2005 à 00:44 +0100, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit : > > Exactly. I don't have alsa-base installed on any of my 2.6.x systems > > and some of them have sound and some don't. None of them have > > problems. > > A de

Re: NoX idea

On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 12:18:14AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > If so... then it's flat-out not available on the set of systems in > > question > Hm? it is on all my systems: > # cat /proc/cmdline > auto BOOT_IMAGE=v2.6.8.1 ro root=811 Can we ass

Re: Bug#297606: ITP: unionfs -- Stackable Unification File System

On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 04:42:15PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > * Paul Hampson [Wed, Mar 02 2005, 08:05:14PM]: > > > I've used this, but briefly, in NetBSD. So maybe I'm missing something > > > when I ask: how is this different from "mount --bi

Re: Bug#297606: ITP: unionfs -- Stackable Unification File System

On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 09:48:52AM +0100, Roberto Suarez Soto wrote: > On Mar/01, Eduard Bloch wrote: > > unionfs is a Linux kernel driver that provides a unification file system > > which can appear to merge the contents of several directories > > (branches), while keeping their physical conte

Re: Bug#297233: ITP: wmansied -- An ANSI/ASCII editor.

On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 06:11:51PM -0600, Joe Wreschnig wrote: > On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 21:28 +, Roger Leigh wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > WMAnsiEd is an ANSI editor with functions like line drawing, e

Re: mplayer, the time has come

On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 10:19:37AM +0100, A Mennucc wrote: > Sebastien NOEL wrote: > >I have some questions about your package: > >* You build libavcodec and libavformat but that seems to me a waste of > >time. > > FFmpeg is already in main, why not only link mplayer with > > libavcodec.a (

Re: [OT] maildir (was Re: procmail and Large File Support)

On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 06:51:32PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Sun, 2005-02-27 at 18:19 -0500, sean finney wrote: > > recent versions of kernel/ext2/ext3 have built-in dirent hashing, which > > cuts heavily on the many-files penalty. another benefit of maildir > > is that when you modify a sing

Re: First line in /etc/hosts

On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 12:13:34AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Also: As far as the kernel is concerned, any local IP is local to *all* > interfaces, and it will happly reply to it (ARP and so on) if allowed to. > The rp_filter will often avoid trouble here, BUT routers often have to

Cross-compiling and dist-cc (Was: Let's remove mips, mipsel, s390, ... (Was: [Fwd: Re: GTK+2.0 2.6.2-3 and buildds running out of space]))

On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 12:44:27PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 08:48:48PM +1300, Nick Phillips wrote: > > Running such a system in parallel with the current systems (and comparing > > the outputs) might be a good test for gcc-as-cross-compiler, then... > And a hell of a

Re: Bug#291945: eleventh-hour transition for mysql-using packages related to apache

On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 08:25:41PM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:17:44AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:53:34AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote: > > > > > Nice, so we should check that any linked GPL library directly > > >

Re: Bug#294209: ITP: reminiscence -- REminiscence is a rewrite of the engine used in the game Flashback from Delphine Software

On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 07:23:44PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > In linux.debian.devel, you wrote: > >> Description: free implementation of Delphine Software's FlashBack engine > >> REminiscence is an engine capable of runing any game based on the > >> FlashBackengine. > >> . > >> To a

Re: execturing libc

On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 10:37:03PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Fri, 04 Feb 2005, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> The way to circumvent a noexec is to call the dynamic linker like I > >> did for libc: > >> > >> /lib64/ld-li

Re: Bug#293167: ITP: request-tracker3.4 -- Extensible trouble-ticket tracking system

On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 11:31:55AM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 02:38:10PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Matthew Palmer: > > > On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > >> * Lars Wirzenius: > > >> > ti, 2005-02-01 kello 15:25 +, Stephen

Re: PHP application packaging policy/best practice?

On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 05:36:22PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Paul Hampson wrote: > > Someone, sometime wrote: (Sorry, lost the attribution at some point) > > > Some people have pointed out that other PHP programs go to /usr/share >

Re: PHP application packaging policy/best practice?

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 01:07:36PM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Kees Leune dijo [Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:19:18PM +0100]: > > Hi, > > > > I am preparing an ITP for a PHP application that is currently under > > development at my place of employment. While thinking about packaging > > it, I was wonder

Re: Status of Kernel 2.4.28 packages?

On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 08:02:25PM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote: > On 02-Jan-05, 15:54 (CST), Stephan Niemz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > By the way, is there a guide somewhere telling how to switch an > > "unstable" system from 2.4 to 2.6? > > apt-get install kernel-image-2.6. Also module-init

Re: Filing bugs with upstream

On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 09:26:44AM +1100, Ian Wienand wrote: > So say I've found a bug in Nautilus that exists in upstream. Gnome > has a well maintained bugzilla where I can file the bug. Do I then > file a Debian bug pointing to the Gnome bugzilla report? I do I file > a Debian bug and point t

Re: charsets in debian/control

On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 04:08:12PM +0100, Shot (Piotr Szotkowski) wrote: > Hello. > Paul Hampson: > > The email address isn't important, since > > that has to be a subset of ASCII anyway. > Are the Unicode-encoded domain names > supported in (modern) browsers

Re: dselect survey

Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've always thought that people who say they hate dselect (or, worse, > that dselect is crap) fall into one of the following cases: > > (a) allergic to text-mode interfaces > (b) type or click without thinking > (c) haven't used it for more than 5 yea

Re: Depending on Virtual Packages (Public Service Announcement)

On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:45:33PM +, Ari Pollak wrote: > Daniel Burrows debian.org> writes: > > When your package Depends upon or Recommends a pure-virtual package P, > > you > > should always OR the dependency with a dependency on something that > > provides > > P, > As a totally offt

Re: Duelling banjos or how a sane community goes crazy

On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 04:33:28PM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 08:12:50AM +0100, Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > I hope all you people are aware that you are causing a new duelling banjo > > case and helping out Google to connect Debian with hot-babes. > Waw

Re: charsets in debian/control

On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 01:40:27AM +, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 09:32:00PM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > > But the only field in UTF8 should be Maintainer, and that field should > > have (IMHO) also a roman transliterate for the name, if you don't use a > > lat

Re: charsets in debian/control

On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 09:26:57AM +0900, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 09:54:36AM +1100, Paul Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Isn't there a proposal around for > > Description#en: > > Description#ja: > And you'd advocate

Re: Bug#283578: ITP: hot-babe -- erotic graphical system activity monitor

On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:38:30PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 13:16 -0500, Nick Sillik wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-12-05 at 16:22 +0100, Paul Plop wrote: > > > A flower may not be a good idea. For many specialists, a flower is a > > > phallic representation. I could hurt some peo

Re: charsets in debian/control

On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 04:42:24PM -0500, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Sunday 05 December 2004 03:32 pm, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > > > Would Peter permit me a mild dissent?  I prefer Latin-1.  Reason: I can > > > recognize and distinguish Latin-1 characters, even when I do not always > > > und

Re: Bug#283903: ITP: dbconfig-common -- common framework for packaging database applications

On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:29:33AM -0500, Sean Finney wrote: > Package name: dbconfig-common > Version : 0.7 > Upstream Author : sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > URL : > http://people.debian.org/~seanius/policy/dbconfig-common.html > License : BSD > Des

Re: Introducing pmount in Debian / New plugdev group

On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:07:12AM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hi! > > Paul Hampson [2004-11-11 10:03 +1100]: > > But don't CD-ROM and floppy devices also need the same sort of pmount > > support you're proposing here? After all, you can hot-swap the media in >

Re: Introducing pmount in Debian / New plugdev group

On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 04:43:41PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > Marco d'Itri [2004-11-10 14:19 +0100]: > > > Our /etc/udev/udev.rules has two new rules directly after the cdrom > > > and floppy rules: > > > # put removable IDE/SCSI devices into group 'plugdev' instead of 'disk' > > > BUS="scsi", KE

Re: Introducing pmount in Debian / New plugdev group

On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 01:25:56PM +0100, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 06:41:40PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > > We solved (4) by introducing a new group called 'plugdev'. Every user > > who is a member of this group can access hotpluggable devices (digital > > cameras, USB drives

Re: Introducing pmount in Debian / New plugdev group

On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 06:41:40PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > We solved (4) by introducing a new group called 'plugdev'. Every user > who is a member of this group can access hotpluggable devices (digital > cameras, USB drives etc.). pmount can only be executed by members of > this group (it is ro

Re: debian.org e-mail address and SPF/SRS

On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 10:37:08PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 12:11:07PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > > * Matthew Palmer > > | Uhm, having just read through the supplied URL, I can't agree with the > > | sanity of the proposal. > > | It appears to require that heade

Re: Very BIG Problem with debian packages versioning...

On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 11:51:44AM +0200, Vincenzo Belloli wrote: > Package: clamav-daemon > Version: 0.80-2 > The problem is related to clamav debian packages maintained by ... and > hosted here: > deb http://people.debian.org/~sgran/debian woody main > I've 2 identical machines. These are ver

Re: an idea for next generation APT archive caching

On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 02:21:17PM +1000, Jonathan Oxer wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 13:43 +1000, Paul Hampson wrote: > > > Is there anything such a system would want to fetch from a Debian > > mirror that doesn't show up in Packages.gz or Sources.gz? > Yes, lots of

Re: an idea for next generation APT archive caching

On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 02:11:44AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote: > Here's an idea I just had about apt-proxy/apt-cacher NG. Maybe this > could be interesting, maybe it's just crap. Your call. > Based on a normal mirror layout, the idea is to use apache's 404 > hook for packages. When an existing p

Re: update-menus , Re: dpkg and selinux

On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 10:07:53AM +0200, A Mennucc wrote: > But I would not do this for ldconfig: > what if a package needs a library it depends on to configure itself? Isn't that why library packages must include the .so symlinks, so they work before ldconfig is called? --

Re: TG3 firmware report...

On Tue, Oct 12, 2004 at 01:30:04PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Perhaps I should construct a package for non-free which instructs users to > download Broadcom's driver; then unpacks it, and converts and installs the > firmware files appropriately? (I *am* sure that Broadcom permits > distribut

Re: TG3 firmware report...

On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 07:10:33PM -0400, Daniel Freedman wrote: > Unfortunately, I believe that my server board contains one of the rare > on-board Broadcom chipsets that is completely unable to function (best > as I can tell), without downloading this firmware, or without at least > disabling the

Re: Bug#220930: ITP: unace -- De-archiver for .ace files

On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 10:33:47PM +0800, Cameron Patrick wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 03:09:17PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > | Hmm, do you mean that *you* don't speak about de-archivers? > | [ This is the first time I hear about this in 6 years ]. > | > | Google says: > | > | dearchiver

Re: Bug#220358: ITP: mecab-ipadic -- IPA dictionary compiled for Mecab

On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:23:59PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > On 14 Nov 2003 13:18:02 +0100 > Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Scripsit Tim Dijkstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > TSUCHIYA Masatoshi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Each User may also freely distribute the Program

Re: radiusd-freeradius history and future

On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 12:53:39PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:35:53AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote: > > I've been splitting out ODBC support locally since the very beginning, > > but everytime I mooted it, Wichert Akkerman (amongst others, but he

Re: radiusd-freeradius history and future

On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 01:24:32PM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Paul Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Cistron begat FreeRADIUS. FreeRADIUS is certainly actively maintained > >upstream. xtRADIUS is also begat of Cis

Re: Security liabilities (Re: radiusd-freeradius history and future)

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 07:44:01PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 09:18:38AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:30:50PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > CAN-2001-1376 and CAN-2001-1377 made the rounds last Spring, with > >

Re: radiusd-freeradius history and future

On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 02:07:27AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:02:49PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:52:00AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > The packages at will be sponsored into > >

Re: radiusd-freeradius history and future

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 09:39:52PM +, Oliver Elphick wrote: > On Tue, 2003-11-11 at 21:00, Paul Hampson wrote: > > PostgreSQL requires license changes, and I've not had much luck buiding > > impetus for this, nor even identified an exact change that would be > > nee

Re: radiusd-freeradius history and future

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 04:30:50PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:03:28AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:02:49PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > > This thing is packed full of strcpy() and strcat(), which is the sor

Re: radiusd-freeradius history and future

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 03:23:24PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 08:00:40AM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote: > > > PostgreSQL requires license changes, and I've not had much luck buiding > > impetus for this, nor even identified an exact change that would

Re: radiusd-freeradius history and future

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 02:02:49PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:52:00AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > > > The packages at will be sponsored into > > the archive as soon as I've had a chance to review them (this week). > > This thing

Re: radiusd-freeradius history and future

On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 10:13:22AM +0100, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 01:21:53PM -0500, Chad Miller wrote: > > [cc debian-devel] > > On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 05:07:41PM +0100, Toni Mueller wrote: > > > [...] Who withdrew [radiusd-freeradius] or caus

Re: On linux kernel packaging issue

On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 10:58:03AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote: > #include > * Nikita V. Youshchenko [Sat, Nov 08 2003, 12:39:58PM]: > > Optimization is a serious issue too. Unlike most user space software, using > > 386 kernel on modern PC will cause serious performance loose. Especially if > > yo

Re: Source only uploads?

On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 02:07:33PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > I think a third (or, after reading some replies to this same mail, > fourth, fifth or nth) way could be used: Binary packages enter Sid as > usual. Now, after the 10-day period, when they are ready to enter > Testing, they are autobuilt

Re: Bug#215205: language-chooser: Language order shouldn't be alphabetical

On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 08:17:06PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 02:32:39PM +0100, Dale Amon wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 01:56:46PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > > Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > And if I'm a german living in america? > > > Then

Re: Debian Birthday in Netcraft

On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 02:03:50PM +0200, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 11:59:30AM +0200, Christian Surchi wrote: > > From Netcraft newsletter and web site: > > > > Debian Linux distribution 10 years old today > > > > http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2003/08/16/

Re: Latest gcc-3.3 and kernel compilation

On Thu, Aug 21, 2003 at 09:37:40AM -0700, Marc Singer wrote: > > gcc --version > gcc (GCC) 3.3.2 20030812 (Debian prerelease) > I'm getting a new error when I compile the kernel. In the structure > below, it doesn't like the declaration for slot_tablen complaining > that > ide-cd.h:440: err

Re: Do not touch l10n files (was Re: DDTP issue)

On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 05:56:08PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > Bonjour, > > I am french and I don't regard the 'Imprimerie Nationale' rules as binding. > We are still a free country. > > Do we have such standard document for the original english description ? > No, and there is no dedicated te

Re: experimental conffile merge for dpkg

On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 09:59:20AM +1000, Brian May wrote: > On Sun, Apr 27, 2003 at 03:52:13PM +0300, Jarno Elonen wrote: > > > There might be things to think about though: some packages have lots > > > of conffiles, and that could mean some extra disk space, which not > > > everyone will want t

Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age

On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 08:42:40AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 12:31:44PM +1000, Paul Hampson wrote: > Hardly, there are many RC bugs or FTBFS bugs in those. I think the main > issue is that the PTS does not show the list of packages holding up. IT > is not as

Re: >2000 packages still waiting to enter testing, > 1500 over age

On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 08:30:42PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 05:59:26PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 04:40:31PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > > depth, i cannot help all that much about it, and libvorbis is a valid > > > candidate, but his install

Re: location of UnicodeData.txt

On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 07:02:07PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 11:47:52AM -0600, John Hasler wrote: > > > Emile van Bergen writes: > > > I'd say that the definition of Unicode, heck even ASCII, involves a fair > > > amount of creativity. > > > > I don't doubt

Re: location of UnicodeData.txt

On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 05:46:04PM +, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 07:33:43PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote: > > > These days I wouldn't be eager to rely on the limits of copyrightability. > > >CNN.com - Composer pays for piece of silence - Sep. 23, 2002 > >