I've been distracted by revenue production for a couple of months.
Are we expected to upload our packages rebuilt for glibc2.1?
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 07:54:41PM -0500, Phillip R. Jaenke wrote:
> I honestly cannot say I have seen a Linux system acting as a fileserver,
> or a workgroup server of any sort, in the sense of handling user logins
> and home directories, as well as applications.
I have. The trouble is that Samb
The reinstall may coerce some missing files to be properly installed.
It doesn't fix the checkVersions warning. On inspecting the source I
find the script. It claims to be part of the Linux port of the jdk
and not from the sun sources. It is the debian/rules files that
deletes it.
To make the s
> jdk1.1 works for me on a slink machine. It is true that Java on Debian seems
> poorly supported and the maintainers overloaded.
>
I'll do an NMU to avoid the warning...but only if we (read as Brian)
deem it necessary for release.
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 10:11:54PM -0600, Jonel Rienton wrote:
>
> Slink's latest lprng is broken, it's give me a problem about permission or
> something'.
Best to submit a bug. Make sure to make it "important".
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 02:01:00PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > jdk1.132548 Java doesn't work at all for me on slink [0]
> > (Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
This bug should probably be downgraded. Java works fine without the
named script. I looked into performing an N
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 01:10:46AM -0800, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 1999 at 10:45:57PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> [ pathetic attempt at sex spam snipped ]
>
> Can we PLEASE enforce our spam policy and make these people pay for their
> crimes against humanity?
>
> --
> "I'm wo
In scanning the contents of this file in Incoming, I some mysterious
NULL bytes. Is this intentional?
zless kernel-source-2.2.0_2.2.0-1.diff.gz
8 matches
Mail list logo
