Simon McVittie debian.org> writes:
> I personally think those factors undermine the "/ as recovery" use-case
> so far that the advantages of a merged /usr far outweigh it.
User side note: If people would like to help the recovery use case,
grml-rescueboot is already packaged which adds grub integ
Thorsten Glaser mirbsd.de> writes:
> • Your primary use case appears to be “the desktop”, whereas Debian, as
> opposed to some of its downstreams and Pure Blends, is a Universal OS,
> which means it’s got much more servers in use, which don’t benefit from
> systemd either at all or at least
Steve McIntyre einval.com> writes:
> Pros:
>
> * CD#1 will work again without size worries
>
> * Smaller, simpler desktop
>
> * Works well/better on all supported kernels (?)
>
> * Does not depend on replacing init
>
> Cons:
> *
IMHO you forgot the crucial part here - why is there a def
Dmitrijs Ledkovs debian.org> writes:
>> Also on technical merits although more philosophically, with Upstart you're
>> expressing yourself in an event-based DSL rather than writing configuration
>> files. It's pretty generic. But unfortunately, that means it's also not
>> entirely straightforward
Steve Langasek debian.org> writes:
> Sorry you ran into trouble with upstart.
Not a DD, just a happy Debian user, hope you'll excuse me, but on the topic
of Upstart, I have some technical comments on why, surprisingly, I think it
may not be mature enough yet.
A couple of years ago I was doing em
5 matches
Mail list logo
