Re: [recentering] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-08-05 Thread Niv Sardi
I feel the debate is going a bit on a tangent in this thread, so I'd like to take an opportunity to recenter it a tad.​ ​We have many issues that were risen in this thread, ​ ​but ​ I believe that the cut has to be made by the people that we have in special roles for; -security for security concer

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Niv Sardi
El 28/07/2014 08:53, "Henrique de Moraes Holschuh" escribió: > However: > > The change in Debian-specific symbol versioning and sonames being done to > ffmpeg so that it is co-installable with libav *is* a problem. > > It has to be done in coordination with the Canonical guys, so that both > Debia

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Reintroducing FFmpeg to Debian

2014-07-28 Thread Niv Sardi
I believe we should get ffmpeg out of new asap in order to be able to have some real data by freeze time. Cheers, -- Niv Sardi

Re: FFmpeg vs. libav packaging (was Re: Proposal: SystemD.pushers/forcers, et cetera)

2014-02-17 Thread Niv Sardi
On Fri, Feb 14 2014, p...@debian.org wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 5:49 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> But how to make the decision whether libav or FFmpeg is better for jessie? > > Seems like getting the two upstreams to collaborate and merge the two > forks is the way to go. actually, there is

Bug#363568: ITP: [RFS] lingot -- accurate and easy to use musical instrument tuner

2006-04-19 Thread Niv Sardi
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Niv Sardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * Package name: lingot Version : 0.6.1 Upstream Authors : Ibán Cereijo Graña <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Jairo Chapela Martínez <[