Re: neat mutt bug.

On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 01:42:04PM -0700, John H. Robinson, IV wrote: > On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 03:17:37AM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > > > > Interesting highlighting bug in mutt -- could confuse an unsuspecting person > > into thinking Branden actually signed this. > > except for that long pause

Re: RFC: Signed packages and translations

On Sat, Sep 01, 2001 at 07:21:28PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote: > On Sat, 1 Sep 2001, Christian Kurz wrote: > > > not be ascii armored since this would only introduce transmission overhead > > > and gain nothing. The file name for this file is constructed from the > > > Why does it gain nothing? Wh