CLA seems to deem it safe to do so:
<http://aixpdslib.seas.ucla.edu/>. DJB also comes to mind. And it
appears that Debian has quite a few packages which are classified as
public domain.
--
Nick Welch aka mackstann | mack @ incise.org | http://incise.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
packaging for debian, I won't really get
involved in that debate except basically to say that it is certainly
worthy of debate. It would be useful to have it apt-gettable, but then
again.. it's 60 lines of code! :)
--
Nick Welch aka mackstann | mack @ incise.org | http://incise.org
be a
minimalist "do what you want with this, but give me credit" license.
If the wording implies restriction of modifications and whatnot, then it
would seem that there have been some big misunderstandings all around.
--
Nick Welch aka mackstann | mack @ incise.org | http://incise.org
>
> Usual example of why random people should not be writing licenses.
It's the fair license, which is OSI approved:
http://opensource.org/licenses/fair.php
--
Nick Welch aka mackstann | mack @ incise.org | http://incise.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
4 matches
Mail list logo
