From: Hamish Moffatt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 11:02:04AM -0500, Mark Mealman wrote:
> > I really don't like unstable either, but I've pretty much
> > abandoned the stable tree as too behind the times back when
> > slink was nearing freeze.
>
> Here's a serious question
From: Joey Hess [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> I'd like to propose that we make a committment to getting an update to
> potato out within a month of the release of the 2.4 kernel or
> the release of potato, whichever comes last. (I did a similar thing for
> slink in a 3 week time-frame, and so I thi
From: Ron Farrer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Slink is called `stable' for a reason. It's not obsolete
> > for people who just want a stable distribution.
> >
> > Of course, it is obsolete for people who want a nice GNOME
> > (or especially KDE) environment, or those who own Athlons or other
>
From: Jacob Kuntz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> our biggest handicap is that we're always a year behind everyone
> else. being a year behind is suicide in any industry. being a year behind
> in an industry that moves as fast as open source software, is idiocy.
Agreed. With hardware changing as r
4 matches
Mail list logo
