Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Koch
* Package name: libjsr305-java
Version : 0~svn97
Upstream Author : Bill Pugh and others.
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/jsr-305/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Java
Description : annotations for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: icu4j
Version : 3.8.1
Upstream Author : IBM Corp. and ICU Team
* URL : http://icu-project.org/
* License : ICU License
Programming Lang: Java
Description : u
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tomcat-native
Version : 1.1.13
Upstream Author : Apache Software Foundation
* URL : http://tomcat.apache.org/
* License : Apache License 2.0
Programming L
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 08:58:54PM +0200, Jeffrey Ratcliffe wrote:
> 2008/6/3 sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > a purge should only remove files that were installed by the package or
> > otherwise incidentally generated in FHS compliant locations. data created in
> > users' home directories is d
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 05:49:32PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> Il giorno Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:30:48 +0100
> Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:54:20PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> > > Il giorno Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:04:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 02:54:20PM +0100, David Paleino wrote:
> Il giorno Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:04:52 -0300
> Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> > As I said, for APT, the order has meaning _always_.
> >
> > apt-get install foo bar
> >
> > Is completely different of
> >
> > apt-
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 08:17:04PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote:
> Hi,
> 15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to:
>
>http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr
>
> the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. What might be the problem?
http://buildd.debian.org/pkg.cgi?pk
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 01:17:24PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>antlr (U)
False positive. libantlr-dev includes two static libraries and may not
be arch:any therefor.
Cheers,
Michael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 12:57:47AM +0100, Mario Lang wrote:
> Hi.
>
> One of my packages (brltty) recently gained Java bindings for its API.
> Now since I added the usage of gcj to brltty, I see that the java toolchain
> seems to be quite out of sync on different archs in different ways.
>
> At f
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:06:17AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:32:40AM +0200, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:21:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > diff -u <(c++filt > > > > --- /dev/fd/63 2007-10-02 00:19:14.
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 12:21:31AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> diff -u <(c++filt --- /dev/fd/63 2007-10-02 00:19:14.445928644 +0100
> +++ /dev/fd/62 2007-10-02 00:19:14.445928644 +0100
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
> raw_socket_stream::raw_socket_stream(FreeSockets::IP_Protocol)@Base 0.3.6-2
> ra
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 05:47:34PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since library maintainers will soon have the possibilty to use
> symbol-based dependencies (instead of shlibs) I setup a system
> to keep up-to-date ready-to-use symbols files using Mole:
> http://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/m
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:56:39AM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:30:27AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On the other hand, maybe I should just be less picky for shared objects
> > without SONAME... I'm not sure about it.
> >
>
> I would suggest that, there a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: swing-layout
Version : 1.0.2
Upstream Author : SUN Microsystems, Inc.
* URL : http://swing-layout.dev.java.net
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: Java
Descr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: javahelp2
Version : 2.0.05
Upstream Author : Sun Microsystems, Inc.
* URL : http://javahelp.dev.java.net
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: Java
Description
to be fast and have small memory footprint. The user
> interface uses swing.
I'm taking this and will package tijmp.
Cheers
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024
; some hits that point to what you describe (the fitness trail), but also
> to online games and actually a photo album by a SS officer. Well.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindernisbahn
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Devel
eers,
Michael
1) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
urely some false positives. e.g. ant. ant builds arch-indep
packages only and so the Depends with (= ${Source-Version}) is correct.
Happy searching for more false positives :-)
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <ht
>
> Otherwise, should I use 4.23~real.4.22-3.1 or similar beasts? Or just
> go for 4.22.3-0.1 and leave the decision to the maintainer?
Or use an epoch: 1:4.22-3.1
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <htt
ing a new
> version of afnix, or marking this bug as blocked by 389163?
Add this to afnix:
Conflicts: aleph
Replaces: aleph
This should make it possible to have always one of them installed and
make afnix replace aleph on dist-upgrades.
Cheers,
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <
d web aoolications are put into /var/www too so choosing a
different root for MyServer defeats this and makes no sense for Debian.
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`-| 1024
Hello,
> antlr
> gjdoc
Somehow these seem to be false positives to me because the packages
depend on a java runtime environment which can but does not have to
depend on.
> libgnucrypto-java
> libjessie-java
I think these an be removed before etch release.
> eclip
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 12:06:40PM -0800, John Gee wrote:
> Guys honestly why aren't we as developers doing a massive overhaul on dpkg?
> I feel we are running on pre-historic machines here. There needs to be at
> least a little looking toward the future in our blood.
What exactly are you missi
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 05:17:56AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:10:27PM +0100, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 04:58:07AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:48:30AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > > Hi Th
On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 04:58:07AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 10:48:30AM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
> > Kevin Mark wrote:
> > > You mean they check ever single time $RANDOM_PACKAGE enter NEW and don't
> > > assume its correct until someone raises an objections? I'd at lea
On Mon, Feb 13, 2006 at 04:54:57PM +0100, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
>
> On 13-02-2006 15:49:02, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> >
> >If you are running Debian, use the reportbug tool to file a bug
> >against
> >"wnpp", type RFP and answer its questions. Or just send an email to
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED], containi
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 04:59:46PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> The following libraries still need to be uploaded with name changes
> for the c2a transition
> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00010.html):
> Most are not in testing at the moment.
>
> alps-light1
> a
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 09:10:58PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Wednesday 30 November 2005 22:00, Michael Koch wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:08:15PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> > > Well, I will try to revert the change, no problem. But eve
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:08:15PM +0100, Stephan Hermann wrote:
> Well, I will try to revert the change, no problem. But even for
> libatlas-cpp-0.6 there was a soname change (if you see this bugreport about
> the rename of libatlas-cpp-0.5) and there was no need to rename
> libatlas-cpp-0.6 be
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:23:58AM +, Joerg Sommer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got a bug report (#336527) my package bootchart-view do not work
> with j2re1.3. But j2re1.3 is not in Debian. Can I set a conflict upon a
> packages that is not in Debian? But if it do not work with j2re1.3 it
> should m
e a bit:
Source: libmodelfile
Section: libs
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Build-Depends: cdbs, debhelper (>= 4.1.0)
Standards-Version: 3.6.2
Package: libmd3-1
Architecture: any
Section: libs
Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}
Description: library to handle Quake .
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Koch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: libmodelfile
Version : 0.1.92
Upstream Author : Al Riddoch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.worldforge.org/
* License : GPL
Description : libra
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 04:14:49PM +0200, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Seo Sanghyeon wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: Seo Sanghyeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * Package name: icu4j
> > Version : 3.4
> > Upst
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 08:59:30AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Adam Heath]
> > I agree. A java policy should talk about how java packages should
> > interact once installed. But stay the hell away from how they are
> > built.
>
> I disagree. It should give recommodations on how they sh
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 09:47:11AM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> #include
> * Eduard Bloch [Tue, May 10 2005, 09:20:38AM]:
>
> > "base" is not a priority level or so, it is just a term for packages
> > that are installed by the original installer. And nothing forbids the
> > local administrator to
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 09:03:21AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 10:52:49AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Andreas Jochens wrote:
>
> > > 'j2sdk1.4' is virtual package which is provided by 'sun-j2sdk1.4',
> > > 'blackdown-j2sdk1.4' and 'ibm-j2sdk1.4
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:21:41AM -0700, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> Recently I've been using umn [1] in my watch files for SourceForge
> packages. It looks like this link is dead now. I find I have to update
> the watch file for all my SourceForge packages every six months or so.
> Finding a new link
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:29:41AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, martin f krafft wrote:
> > It seems tha dpatch cannot be trivially used to patch debian/rules
> > when the patch target is called implicitly. Note that it works if
> > I invoke build and then binary
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 09:04:21AM +0100, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
>
> > Well, my point was to have a common predefined way of doing it: once you
> > install kdm (or someone else), or move to xdm or whatever, you still can
> > disable the start of X by putting nox in the command line, instead of hav
On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 02:45:26PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
> Re: Michael Koch in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > is "rm /etc/rc2.d/S99gdm" not easy enough for you ?
>
> Please don't recommend rm'ing the S* links. Rename them to K* instead
> or else they
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 09:06:41PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> Em Ter, 2005-03-01 às 23:36 +0100, Jesus Climent escreveu:
> > What would people think about adding a check on all the *dm managers (read
> > kdm, gdm and friends) about cheking the kernel command line from
> > /proc/cmdline
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 11:36:46PM +0100, Jesus Climent wrote:
> What would people think about adding a check on all the *dm managers (read
> kdm, gdm and friends) about cheking the kernel command line from /proc/cmdline
> and grep for nox?
>
> I have the need some times to start a laptop with con
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 03:09:41PM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> On Thursday 17 February 2005 13:18, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 06:19:59AM +0200, Marcus Sundman wrote:
> > > I do the following (irrelevant output omitted):
> > > 8<---
Am Donnerstag, 13. Januar 2005 12:49 schrieb Santiago Vila:
> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > The stats:
> >
> > 8,920 source packages in Debian unstable main.
> > 8,254 declare a build-dependency on debhelper
> >
> > = 92% of packages build-depend on debhelper.
> >
> >
Am Montag, 10. Januar 2005 17:06 schrieb Baurjan Ismagulov:
> Hello,
>
> I'm developing an application using libglib2.0-dev and automake
> 1.7. I'm using AM_PATH_GLIB_2_0 macro in my configure.ac. In the
> default installation, aclocal fails to find the macro unless I link
> /usr/share/aclocal/glib
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-05
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sage
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Simon Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.worldforge.org/
* License : LGPL 2.1
Description : Supports OpenGL in SDL a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi list,
Is db.debian.org gone into nirvana ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> host db.debian.org
db.debian.org has address 209.249.97.234
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~> ping -c 4 db.debian.org
PING db.debian.org (209.249.97.234) 56(84) bytes of data.
- --- db.debian.o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Samstag, 28. Juni 2003 04:09 schrieb Junichi Uekawa:
> Hi,
>
> I've received several reports that debootstrap of sid has not been
> possible recently due to sysvinit.
>
> I guess the problem is that sysvinit related postinst
> scripts are calling 'i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Dienstag, 24. Juni 2003 09:45 schrieb Ralf Hildebrandt:
> * Andreas Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > You could start by telling us what maildirmake is supposed to do.
> > Why do we need it? Any program I know of which can handle Maildir
> > is not o
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sigc
Version : 0.07
Upstream Author : Ron Steinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://sigcperl.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description : Perl bindings to the li
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-21
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: sigcperl
Version : 0.2.0
Upstream Author : Ron Steinke
* URL : http://sigcperl.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description : Helper library for the libsigc++ Perl
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-04-28
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: cal3d
Version : 0.8
Upstream Author : Bruno 'Beosil' Heidelberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://cal3d.sourceforge.net/
* License : LGPL
Description : Skeletal b
Hello,
I found another bug. In the list of available packages the source
libsigc++-1.1 is visibile/accessible but libsigc++ does not seem to exist.
Michael
54 matches
Mail list logo
