On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 12:46 PM, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Aug 31, Bastian Blank wrote:
>
>> I doubt that I would be able to push this port through another release
>> in the current state. The consequence would by that the port dies
>> completely and with it the only free and released distribution
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:55 AM, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Monday 22 December 2008 17:55, "Paul Wise" wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Kjeldgaard Morten
>>
>> wrote:
>> > Another model that I think has not been discussed is never freezing
>> > stable.
>>
>> Freezing is the whole point
The problem is you can't wave a magic wand, and fix the community.
It's a self-feeding cycle which goes on and on and on. Even if we had
a Code of Conduct for Debian, unless it was strongly enforced, its the
same problem.
Whether the ballot was valid or not was immaterial, the response to it
was c
I'll add my two cents.
I have some experience with radios. The FCC requires all radios to be
certified before they can be sold, and there is a requirement that you
must not make a device that is easily modifiable to operate outside
the limits put forth by the FCC. In this case, it would be illegal
that list.
Michael
On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 9:03 PM, Samuel Thibault
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Casadevall wrote
>> kfreebsd-* is pretty close to releasable; they've got the archive
>> built in the high 80s, and are keeping up).
>
> BTW, it may be worth notin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have a local mirror of m68k, and both kfreebsd ports, and they're
roughly 70-80GB including source. If ries has become so full that
space is becoming an issue, then dropping arm, hurd-i386, and m68k is
a stopgap move at best (your only going to recov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not a DD so I can't add myself to the list; I'd like to see better
support for importing dsc files and binaries into the archive (aka to
importing an existing archives (import-archive now works though after
I gave it a lobotomy).
Database wise, t
sbuild calls dpkg-buildpackage to build the package. It doesn't touch
the rules file directly.
On 8/8/08, Francisco Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I believed buildd.debian.org was meant to build only binary-arch packages.
>
> But in recent build logs of the zeroc-ice package:
> http://b
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it seems like a pretty bad idea to NFU software
that can be compiled on an architecture even if it doesn't seem that useful.
I have the X11 libraries on my NSLU2, which lacks any graphical output, but
I use it as an X11 server.
That being said, I can see the point from
Linux)
Comment: http://getfiregpg.org
iD8DBQFId//JpblTBJ2i2psRAu6uAJ48+knPTzxi1InA/Wg3AN4m2Rt8WwCfa/ES
rddl6+w/Kw+7UBVNQLjLplE=
=fGdJ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:48:03AM -0400, Michael Ca
Maybe a check should be added to APT to flag a warning if there has been no
updates for a significant period of time? That way if a mirror ever does
that, its more detectable.
Michael
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Steinar H. Gunderson <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 07:36:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Michael Casadevall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: devotee
Version : 0.1patch2
Upstream Author : Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.debian.org/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang
I'm going to have to agree with this; I admin m68k buildds; I had to
preinstall most of the texex packages simply because it was taking hours
(and that is not an exaggeration) to install them all, and then remove
them all again. A trigger based system would help relieve this problem. I
had a si
What about simply decoupling mips/mipsel's version numbers so an out of
date package on mips(el) doesn't stall out the rest of the testing. Having
(somewhat) setup britney/update_out to generate testing for m68k, it
should just be a matter of adding of adding mips and mipsels, to the
proper li
Hi,
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 09:43 +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 08:22:36AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
> > Yes. Except that you don't have to go trying to find someone. You should
> > file a RFP bug against wnpp and wait until someone has sufficient
> > interest and sk
15 matches
Mail list logo
