On 2018-02-12 22:41, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
If DSA is not able to restore my .debian.net domains, I can explain
to interested DDs how to restore them.
FYI, someone tried but its request got rejected by the system because
the domains are already used by me. So, it will require enabling my
account
Hi,
On 2018-02-12 16:58, Frédéric Bonnard wrote:
Hi all,
since a few days, ubuntudiff is not reachable (name does not resolve).
I see Mehdi administrate this domain (
https://wiki.debian.org/DebianNetDomains ).
Mehdi, anyone, do you know what's going on ?
Thanks for pointing this out. I
n community.
I really don't think you are in a minority on this subject. We just seem
to be stuck with our own administrative burden and lack some leadership
on complex subjects where we might be helped with some push.
--
Mehdi
oposals should build upon the notion of teams in
tracker.d.o or in gitlab (or both?). Both tools have a notion of a "team"
or a "group" and could provide an email alias for member subscribed or
member of those groups. I believe this would address the need of most teams,
to have a single point of contact. Such aliases would help us to avoid bug
notifications and alike on discussion MLs.
Best,
--
Mehdi
, ChangZhuo Chen wrote:
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 06:47:35PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
I have gone through your page and here are my first remarks:
- The bylaws are not in english and are not stored in a file (I see
you use
a pad to share it). You may want to publish it on a webpage or a
flat
Hello,
Sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
On 22/02/2017 04:30, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
> Dear Mehdi,
>
> I'd like to propose OCF.tw to be a Trusted Organization.
> And OCF.tw also have the interests to be in. But I don't know how to start.
>
Hi,
On 27/06/2016 21:26, Iustin Pop wrote:
> On 2016-06-27 18:10:00, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> - - Approved purchase of PGP hardware tokens for DAMs. (Up to 200€)
>
> Could you please tell which hardware was this? Just curious for my own
> use—still have to migrate to such
Hi,
On 27/06/2016 20:52, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 06:10:00PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> Newmaint delegation revoked
>> ===
>>
>> The Newmaint team is responsible of checking new Debian Maintainers
>> appl
http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/collab-maint/ben.git/tree/lib/benl_compression.ml
And this can be specified with a CLI flag or in the configuration file.
Regards,
--
Mehdi
iable).
The lintian flag is a good idea too.
--
Mehdi
On 2016-01-04 17:24, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 22/12/2015 00:38, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
The change done in unison 2.48 to overcome this looks pretty big...
I'm
not sure I'll be able/willing to provide a unison2.40.102 any more.
Moreover, this package was created to provide compatib
be very vague or quite
complicated.
Regards,
--
Mehdi
ble with recent OCaml version.
This is now fixed in Unison 2.48... hence the backport of Unison 2.48. But
there is nothing to fix in Stable...
My only doubt right now (about the backport) is about #805456. It would
be great to hear about the submitter before exposing Unison 2.48 to users
of stable.
Regards,
-- Mehdi
that's a design flaw in Unison that cannot be easily fixed.
>
A possible way out for stable (and old-stable) users could be to use 2.48
from backports, when 2.48 will be packaged and migrated to testing.
My 2 cents,
--
Mehdi
Hi Steve,
Steve Langasek writes:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2015 at 01:12:12PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> Auto-building arch:all packages
>> ===
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>
> This is all great news!
>
> If I'm not mistaken, the la
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi
* Package name: jsonm
Version : 0.9.1
Upstream Author : Daniel Bünzli
* URL : http://erratique.ch/software/jsonm
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : Non-blocking streaming JSON codec for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi
* Package name: uutf
Version : 0.9.4
Upstream Author : Daniel Bünzli
* URL : http://erratique.ch/software/uutf
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : Non-blocking streaming Unicode codec for
work,
Raphaël!
Thanks buxy for all your (past and future) work on dpkg!
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/2fceaa864216ed26d856c61f089cc...@dogguy.org
Hello ,i have a question about my pc,I bought a pc with original operation
windows 7 almost one year ago then my internet become slow after that i give my
pc to my friend to fix it ,now i see that he totally change the operation
without ask me ,now when i start my pc i dont see any windows 7 c
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 06:52:20PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 19:33 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>
> > If someone is working on some new project/service for Debian and wants
> > to be hosted on a DSA-managed machine, what are the criteria that
> > shou
sort of
guidelines that developers should keep in mind while creating their
project, if they plan to be hosted on a DSA-managed machine eventually.
It also doesn't have to be exhaustive, but at least give an idea of
what is reasonable to expect and what are the general restrictions.
Regards,
ice if DSA could clarify that for their fellow developers.
[1]: or if it exists, I'd be happy to read it.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debia
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Dogguy
* Package name: opam
Version : 1.0.0
Upstream Author : OCamlPro
* URL : http://opam.ocamlpro.com/
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : package manager for OCaml
OPAM stands for
to do it during the
development
cycle this time.
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/a9216453b89dd7358222efbc2734d...@dogguy.org
BFSes if you remove the binaries from
boot/.
If you do it without adapting the packaging… of course, it will FTBFS!
/me o_O
That's RC, I think.
It is not. (and it is not the only package doing that).
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Dogguy
* Package name: opam
Version : 0.9.0
Upstream Author : OCamlPro
* URL : http://opam.ocamlpro.com/
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : package manager for OCaml
OPAM stands for
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Dogguy
* Package name: ocaml-re
Version : 1.1.1
Upstream Author : Jerome Vouillon
* URL : https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml-re
* License : LGPL 2.1
Programming Lang: OCaml
Description : regular expression
On 11/25/2012 07:36 PM, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> On 11/25/2012 02:39 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
>>> Quoting Bastien ROUCARIES (roucaries.bast...@gmail.com):
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I plan
7;s a good idea to delay the release a little bit more,
> again.
>
It will not delay the release, if we agree on ignoring them for Wheezy
(only).
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
ctly fine to me that the release team decides what is RC or
> not (even if I don't agree, it's your call...), […]
Julien answered the question though and you don't seem to disagree (by
reading your mail).
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5072ad96.30...@dogguy.org
of packages ; or for people waiting to become DD.
If some person has a need to upload 450 packages, then that person
should become DD. Your idea simply abuses the DM status.
My 2 cents,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
ries and applications because it makes
transitions harder for no good reason.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian
/wiki/Miniconf-Paris/2012
L'inscription n'est pas obligatiore cette année mais cela nous est utile
pour avoir une approximation du nombre de participants.
Cordialement,
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Abaakouk
* Package name: python-django-openstack-auth
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Gabriel Hurley
* URL : https://github.com/gabrielhurley/django_openstack_auth.git
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Abaakouk
* Package name: python-cinderclient
Version : folsom
Upstream Author : Openstack
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/python-cinderclient
* License : Apache-2
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Abaakouk
* Package name: python-warlock
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Brian Waldon
* URL : http://github.com/bcwaldon/warlock
* License : Apache-2
Programming Lang: python
Description : Python object
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Abaakouk
* Package name: python-glanceclient
Version : folsom
Upstream Author : Openstack
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/python-glanceclient
* License : Apache-2
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Abaakouk
* Package name: python-swiftclient
Version : 1.1.0
Upstream Author : Openstack
* URL : https://github.com/openstack/python-swiftclient
* License : Apache-2
Programming Lang: Python
Description
web/?p=pkg-ocaml-maint/packages/why.git;a=blob;f=debian/gbp.conf;h=4435dcbe6d877cec7f562e8757939b7e98ecf5d8;hb=HEAD
for how to configure it.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubs
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Dogguy
* Package name: dochelp
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Mehdi Dogguy
* URL : http://git.debian.org/?p=users/mehdi/dochelp.git
* License : GPL-3+
Programming Lang: OCaml, Javascript
Description
On 06/29/2012 09:15 PM, Ralf Treinen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 07:21:21PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> Package: wnpp
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Owner: Mehdi Dogguy
>>
>> * Package name: ben
>> Version : 0.6
>> Upstream Autho
OCaml libs to build. It also builds an OCaml library
that it is meant to grow considerably in future. I don't think it is a
good idea to put it in devscripts.
¹: This has to do with "Britney".
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to de
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Dogguy
* Package name: ben
Version : 0.6
Upstream Author : Mehdi Dogguy and Stéphane Glondu
* URL : http://ben.debian.net/
* License : AGPL-3+
Programming Lang: C, OCaml
Description : toolbox for Debian
On 06/23/2012 08:23 AM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Unfortunately, we never require that our users upgrade to the latest
> point release before upgrading to stable+1.
http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/release-notes/ch-upgrading.en.html#system-status
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤ
responsibility
of a sponsor, but it seems OT wrt. the original request.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Arc
d not ignore them
and force your own (which was, aiui, what the original submitter of this
thread wanted to do) just because $foo.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
ffected by severe or critical bugs.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fc785ae.40...@dogguy.org
need operations with big files in /tmp?
Increase your swap? If it is not possible, then your RAM won't help much
neither. If you really have many RAM and less disk, then this is very a
specific case and we shouldn't bother making it "a general case".
Regards,
--
Meh
On 16/05/12 13:41, Wookey wrote:
is there any reason not to just upload this to Debian?
There are ITPs filed for it:
- http://bugs.debian.org/582884
- http://bugs.debian.org/576359
Regards,
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On 08/02/12 14:05, Stefano Karapetsas wrote:
I saw some gnome design team mockups of all applications, and I find
its far from GNOME2.
Then, why don't you help them? (It is easier than re-packaging and
maintaining Gnome2).
Regards,
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel
f the discussion?
Regards,
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f325217.8050...@dogguy.org
to send a debdiff when NMUing. That's even better to see
what the changes of the NMU are (See devref §5.11.1). Personally, I find
patching files under debian/ directory makes things more difficult to
track (probably because I don't expect to find those changes there).
Regards,
--
x27;t contain a
description, fwiw.
See http://lintian.debian.org/tags/quilt-patch-missing-description.html
Regards,
--
Mehdi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists
On 12/13/2011 07:26 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 07:03:55PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> On 12/13/2011 01:23 PM, Thomas Koch wrote:
>
>>> So is it ok to ship binaries in the source package that are only
>>> required during build? Can I do t
On 12/13/2011 07:26 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 07:03:55PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> On 12/13/2011 01:23 PM, Thomas Koch wrote:
>
>>> So is it ok to ship binaries in the source package that are only
>>> required during build? Can I do t
justified for simple-build-tool. I was
planning to have a look at it, but didn't find time to actually do that.
IIRC, another issue is that simple-build-tool requires network access
during the build… I guess it can be fooled somehow but didn't check yet.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الد
ffs.
In any case, I'd be happy to help here to implement and setup this new
service.
¹: btw, the tool's name is “maddie”.
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe&q
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mehdi Dogguy
* Package name: ocaml-zarith
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Xavier Leroy and Antoine Mine
* Url : https://forge.ocamlcore.org/projects/zarith/
* License : LGPL 2 with special linking exception
Programming
On 07/27/2011 11:42 AM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Systemtap seems in pretty bad shape. Its removal from testing has been
requested (See #635543) and will be effective by Saturday if still not
fixed.
hum, Julien already put a hint for it and it is now removed from testing.
It is always possible to
Hello,
Systemtap seems in pretty bad shape. Its removal from testing has been
requested (See #635543) and will be effective by Saturday if still not
fixed.
It you still care about systemtap, please step up and offer your help to
fix it.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org
On 07/07/2011 07:13 PM, Xavier Oswald wrote:
>
> Take this announce as a "come back" with new motivation :)
> Im incrementaly managing my time for getting back to a normal debian activity.
>
Welcome back! :)
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBS
might be what you are looking for.
HTH,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
mehdi@{dogguy.org,debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4e12d80a.3060...@debian.org
ve those tags if he's sure
that it also applies to testing/unstable.
Thanks for your other answers on debugs.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
at we could have those
bugreports on bugs.d.o directly and that there is no need for another
instance of debbugs, because their number isn't insane, as most of us tend
to think.
[1] http://backports.debian.org/FAQ/
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To U
stanace.
>
> The old URLs now redirect to the new ones, so nothing should be broken.
>
User-repositories are still broken though (take src:kino as an example).
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.or
#x27;s setup…
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4ddcbc08.9010...@dogguy.org
to gather such
informations and put them somewhere so that we don't understand why is it
so important, and why users don't just use testing today.
I can't find the answers here and it seems that you're not able to give
them, because otherwise you would have used them already to
her, then we gained nothing but some
burden within Debian and some bad consequences for Wheezy.
So, please do not use such simplistic conclusions.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
mehdi@{dogguy.org,debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
/release.debian.org/~jcristau/perl5.12-binNMUs-source-all.txt
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dbfe402.3080...@dogguy.org
ould file a bug with each viewer, so that each code gets fixed.
Well, both do use libpoppler5… which is a PDF rendering library.
My 2cents,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
at being used by
> 'standard' users.
>
I can also say exactly the same about testing ;) I don't think we can go
too far with this argument.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dbe55f1.9070...@dogguy.org
se notes
2) not enough contributors fixing RC-bugs
3) people working on upgrade tests and fixing upgrade issues
4) d-i releases are not frequent and take too long, that really slows down
things a bit. It has direct impact on 3).
If we can enhance some of them (hopefully, all of them), we will be
"rolling", especially
when all the work is already done (migration scripts, etc…)
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis
to upload the fixed package to $codename-proposed-updates.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://
On 04/30/2011 03:47 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
On 30.04.2011 15:24, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 04/30/2011 03:16 PM, Arno Töll wrote:
Perhaps that's a not a particular fair demand. See, crucial for
Raphaels idea as I read it is "official" s
On 04/30/2011 03:24 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
On 30/04/11 at 14:31 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 04/28/2011 08:20 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The sooner we get the big transitions done, the sooner we can
focus on fixing the remaining bugs.
There will be always new transitions… you're gon
nd it doesn't anything else than manpower and time. All
tools and data are already published and free software. And, if he needs
assistance to set up one of the needed tools, I'm sure he'll find some.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On 04/28/2011 08:20 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
The sooner we get the big transitions done, the sooner we can focus
on fixing the remaining bugs.
There will be always new transitions… you're gonna to wait for ever.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBS
without waiting. Go book
"rolling.debian.net" and set up a britney instance there. It's not a
difficult task. It will help us to know who actually uses it, when, how
much, etc… Please do prove us wrong!
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
ng" won't fix those problems. And, saying that it'll be supported
on a 'best-effort basis', it doesn't ring any bell to me, tbh. We all
already do that, except a few (I don't even know who they are). Those
won't change their behavior because it's already &#x
ause it requires much time and manpower), and we will be forced to
accept the new version. We did it _once_ for Chromium, it's not said
that we will do that again! So this argument doesn't stand either. It's
making a big assumptions on various things.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي
n't see periods where all Release Team members were really
that busy to not be able to add an age-days hint or approve a t-p-u
upload. I'm not sure we will see that day. And the same issue remains true
with rolling scenario (existence of that bottleneck).
Having that said, avoiding bo
e.
It was really not meant to be sent.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4db9e0fa.8070...@dogguy.org
On 28/04/2011 17:30, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> 1) At the beginning of the developement cycle, (with the new plan) you
>> start from testing, and not the new stable. So, you don't start with a
>> base that's rc-bug free, or a
On 28/04/2011 17:25, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 28/04/11 at 16:52 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>>
>> 1) At the beginning of the developement cycle, (with the new plan) you
>> start from testing, and not the new stable. So, you don't start with a
>> base that's
ve an answer yet. But, it
you'd like me to read your ideas, you're going to put some efforts and
post them here, instead of pointing me to your blog. really.
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
mehdi@{dogguy.org,debian.org}
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On 28/04/2011 15:52, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> | before| during | release | freeze| freeze
>> | day+1 | dev period | |
>> ———
On 28/04/2011 11:29, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> For example: What would be Rolling's content right after a release?
>> (comparing to testing, which starts from the stable just released).
>> I
>
> Rolling doesn't m
ect well the goal of something
> that's constantly usable.
>
Except that it's lying to our users to name it "rolling" because packages
from rolling won't be rc-bug free. For this reason, I think that "testing"
is a very well choosen name, more honest about
On 28/04/2011 09:06, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 05:58:46PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
>> Funny… reading your recent blogpost,
>
> (FWIW, the blog post Mehdi is referring to is, I guess, at [1])
>
>> you seem to not understand yet what you want
able
> might make everyone less confused :-)
>
uh… thanks! that's more clear, indeed.
> [1] Announcement of 'testing':
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2000/08/msg00906.html
>
> Regards,
> S
>
>
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://d
07/people-behind-debian-adam-d-barratt-release-manager/
> http://raphaelhertzog.com/2010/12/23/people-behind-debian-mehdi-dogguy-release-assistant/
>
Funny… reading your recent blogpost, you seem to not understand yet what
you want to put into Rolling (and how). So, how can we comment on
somet
tion which is targeted to support servers properly,
yes, definitely. For everything else there is Ubuntu.
I sincerely hope that you're joking… At least, the rest of the project
doesn't share this view. It's like saying that "Desktop users are second
class citizens", whi
ore 2009.
can't this limit to 2009 be pushed further? what would be the difference
if we consider 2010, or 2011? (Just want to see the impact).
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &quo
7;s correct that there is no need to consider Built-Using when migrating
packages from one distribution to another, because the information there
is too strict. Instead, we could check that Build-Depends are fulfilled
when migrating the package. But, this is a long standing known issue
(#145257).
wrapping,
they ended up on the same line :)
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d7e0ce6.6080...@dogguy.org
implemented in
other mentioned tools.
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d7a0fd5.7060...@dogguy.org
alled (and
> what build-conflicts need to be removed), in a form that's automatically
> consumable by other tools including, but not limited to, apt-get.
> dpkg-checkbuilddeps fails this because it only tells which b-d's are
> unsatisfied, in a form that has to be further pro
devscripts is too much work without benefit. devscripts
would depend on python then.
I suspect that the number of scripts to be moved is quite low. Moreover,
most of them are very simple and can be rewritten very easily. Is
rewriting them not an option?
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http:/
the tagging to be done by anyone or only by the release team?
The latter.
> Do you want suggestions sent to you?
>
Feel free to send us suggestions at debian-rele...@lists.debian.org
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dev
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
