Re: KDE gone, Linux next?

care less. But when it comes to something like the kernel - something that at times requires fast bugfixes - it is extreemly important. Why give them the option to release closed source when we can force them to release free versions? -- Matthew Parry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.bo

Re: KDE gone, Linux next ? [binary only support != good support]

care less. But when it comes to something like the kernel - something that at times requires fast bugfixes - it is extreemly important. Why give them the option to release closed source when we can force them to release free versions? -- Matthew Parry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.bowerbir

Re: KDE gone, Linux next ?

uldn't prevent it, unless I'm missing something. I really don't know, I'm just relaying what I've read Linus and RMS say. It might just be a licence issue, or more probably it might make drivers less likely to break with a kernel upgrade. -- Matthew Parry <[EMAIL

Re: KDE gone, Linux next ?

Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 13:00:52 +0200 From: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Matthew Parry wrote: > > I think a much more important implication of the KDE debacle is

KDE gone, Linux next ?

Red Hat seems to be like minded on these matters, so we can probably rely on them too. What does everyone think? Do we give Linus a good spanking? -- Matthew Parry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.bowerbird.com.au/people/mettw/> - "There now, didn't I tell you to keep a go

Re: what's after slink

bian Zaphod Debian Beebelbrox Debian Slarty Debian Bartfast Debian Dent Debian Vogon Debian Trillian Debian Marvin Debian Paranoid-Android or even better - Debian "Don't Panic!" -- Matthew Parry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.bowerbird.com.au/people/mettw/> -