Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Meredith
* Package name: skipfish
Version : 1.32b
Upstream Author : Michal Zalewski
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/skipfish
* License : Apache
Programming Lang: C
Description : A fully automated
Hi all,
As it seems the maintainer for pound is MIA, I intend to hijack this package.
This will be placed in a 3 day DELAYED queue later on today.
If there are any objections, please give me a shout via email (Please CC me in
the reply, as I only read the lists on occasions)
--
Regards,
Martin
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 06:58:36PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
> * Charles Plessy [Sat, 27 Dec 2008 02:51:00 +0900]:
>
> > Dear all,
>
> Hola,
>
> > I am playing with Joey Hess's `mr' tool and try to prepare a configuration
> > file
> > shareable by people having the same interests. I have a li
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 17:24 +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Всеволод Величко wrote:
> > May be, you can help me with the following?
> >> which CC licenses are treated as DFSG compatible now? Could someone read
> >> this license:
> >> http://pastebin.com/m4ba1c5ed and say, can I packag
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 10:57 +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Reinhard Tartler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > With "Like this" I mean packages that have been held back in NEW for a
> > very long time without response or REJECTED with an reason not
> > acceptable to the maintainer? Does mediating this
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 17:15 +0200, Olivier Berger wrote:
> OK, thanks.
>
> I still am not completely sure about something : should only bugs of
> severity >= "important" be fixed (and uploaded to unstable for the
> "important" ones) in order for inclusion in lenny, or also lesser
> severities too
As mrvn pointed out to me earlier, rar's licence should be displayed to
the user before the package is installed.
To this end, I plan to add a preinst script which displays the licence
to the user, and lets them agree or disagree to the licence.
As policy frowns on Pre-Depends, I thought I'd chec
As mrvn pointed out to me earlier, rar's licence should be displayed to
the user before the package is installed.
To this end, I plan to add a preinst script which displays the licence
to the user, and lets them agree or disagree to the licence.
As policy frowns on Pre-Depends, I thought I'd chec
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 11:13 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 3:36 AM, Martin Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Any thoughts?
>
> Not sure if dak/buildds can handle this, but what about multiple
> source packages?
>
> Something like unra
Hi there.
I currently maintain rar and unrar-nonfree in debian.
When uscanning for the latest version of rar - it started to download
the x64 version, which I haven't seen before.
Anyway - It seems that upstream are now packaging a i386 binary, and an
x64 binary.
I'm not too sure how I should h
Hi there,
Looking over the lintian reports for katapult, I've noticed that the
Apps/Tools section seems to be missing now from the menu system (yes, I
know I'm a bit late - but better late than never!)
Anyway, I can't see a suitable alternative for katapult, any ideas?
(Please reply to list + my
On Tue, 2008-01-01 at 18:32 -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Martin Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Looking over the lintian reports for katapult, I've noticed that the
> > Apps/Tools section seems to be missing now from the menu system (yes, I
> > kn
However, if you were to request it - either through a member of core-dev -
or through the person who last updated the package, then as long as
yourdebian package worked exactly as it is intended to in ubuntu - I'm sure
they'd not have a problem with syncing and using your package from debian.
The
Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> I have only said that I would like Ubuntu to clearly label
> which is the Debian maintainer and which is the Ubuntu maintainer.
Thing is, in ubuntu - we don't neccesarily have "maintainers" for packages.
We use a collaborative process - anyone who had access can modif
Ben Finney wrote:
> On 13-Jan-2006, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
>
>> --- Eddy Petriºor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
>>
>>>Can ome packaging can be done for non-free games?
>>
>>To be honest, I'm not particulary interested in non-free software at
>>all, including games, but I have nothing against it if w
Please read my first couple of lines in the email - as quoted below
>>Ok - I'm going to reply to the first post i found on this whole -
>>thing, so apologies if it shows up in some weird place in threaded
>>view.
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> OK. Since you selected my post to reply to -- are
hat I first thought it
was)
2) I am not lumping all Ubuntu Devs into one boat - nor all Debian Devs - I'm
jsut saying that I
think it's the few people out of the large who arent willing to cooperate for
whatever reason that
are causing this tension.
Martin Meredith wrote:
> Ok - I&#
Ok - I'm going to reply to the first post i found on this whole - thing, so
apologies if it shows up
in some weird place in threaded view.
Basically the way I see it isnt the fact that ubuntu isn't giving back to
debian - or debian isn't
willing to have the stuff from ubuntu. The way i see it is
Apparently - theres a major problem with immodule in Qt at the moment - which
causes
KeyReleasedEvent ro return a value of 0 for any QKeyEvent ... which is bad -
and means that anything
that relies on it will have problems processing the keypresses.
I found this out after my app in ubuntu had pr
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: idjc
Version : 0.5.7
Upstream Author : Stephen Fairchild <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.onlymeok.nildram.co.uk
* License : GPL
Description
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 15:19:42 -0500, Frans Jessop
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>
>>Ubuntu's launchpad is amazing. Do you think it would be helpful if
>>all DD's worked through it on their projects?
>
>
> Sure, as long as they change lauchpad to meet my workf
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Martin Meredith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name : qtodo
Version : 0.1
Upstream Author : Tobias [EMAIL PROTECTED]> * URL : http://qtodo.berlios.de/
* License : GPL
Description : Todo List Manager
QTodo is a todo-list manager. It is desig
22 matches
Mail list logo
