Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?

2006-06-19 Thread Marc Chantreux
Hi Tollef Fog Heen wrote: Adrian von Bidder skrev: On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:06, Marc Chantreux wrote: Is there a way to help/join/"have news from" the apache team ? Have you tried contacting the apache maintainers directly? (I'd cc such mails to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] lis

Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?

2006-06-16 Thread Marc Chantreux
le 15/06/2006, Adrian von Bidder nous écrivait : > There is the debian-apache mailing list. I don't ee much life there, > though, except for bts email. the irc chan looks like ghost city too ... cheers mc -- téléphone : 03.90.24.00.19 courriel : [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?

2006-06-15 Thread Marc Chantreux
Olaf, > >I still apply my patch on every server i install, this is boring me. > > > >Is there a way to help/join/"have news from" the apache team ? > > Try irc://irc.debian.org/debian-apache > Unfortunately, a more informative answer than it's fixed when it's > fixed shouldn't be expected. than

some Debian Apache Maintainer here ?

2006-06-15 Thread Marc Chantreux
Hi all, I've posted a patch to fix #350119, #342008, #350119 139 days ago and have no news about it. I tried to contact the apache team to know if i was able to help but i have no news. I still apply my patch on every server i install, this is boring me. Is there a way to help/join/"have news

Re: how to link 2 bug reports ?

2006-01-29 Thread Marc Chantreux
thanks everyone for your answers. regards, mc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

how to link 2 bug reports ?

2006-01-29 Thread Marc Chantreux
Hi all, i've done the bug report #350119 last week (providing a patch) and just seen that this patch fixes #342008. Is it a way to 'link' them in the BTS? (as i'm not a DD) regards mc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?

2005-08-26 Thread Marc Chantreux
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a écrit : Anyway, just make triple sure to never use anything from /usr in a script that otherwise only needs / to work. If you find anything like that, report it as a important (usually whatever it is starts after /usr is mounted) or grave (it starts befure /usr is

Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?

2005-08-26 Thread Marc Chantreux
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh a écrit : Note that using dash is probably MUCH faster than perl. I don't know about zsh. it's not always true : it just depends on your problems and solutions : write a dash script to open a lot of pipes between grep,sed,awk and other filters to treat a lot of f

Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?

2005-08-25 Thread Marc Chantreux
Andrew Porter a écrit : bash is actually pretty good if you know how to use it (and most of the ksh93 comliant functions) - the problem is that most programmers don't. The ${} constructs add a lot of power and allow the programmer to be less reliant on external tools. zsh provides some things i

Re: better init.d/* : who carres ?

2005-08-25 Thread Marc Chantreux
First of all, thank you all for your answers. i'll provide some documented, posix compliant, one piped patches as wishlist. Of course this would all be so much simpler if we could actually use the power of modern shells (post 1993) in init scripts - subprocesses wouldn't be required at all...

better init.d/* : who carres ?

2005-08-24 Thread Marc Chantreux
Hi all, there are a lot of things in /etc/init.d/*, and {pre,post}inst scripts that can be rewritten more efficiently ( i think ). for example, in /etc/init.d/mysqld mysqld_get_param() { /usr/sbin/mysqld --print-defaults \ | tr " " "\n" \ | grep -- "--$1"