Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Holmgren
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: idjc
Version : 0.9.9
Upstream Contact: Stephen Fairchild
* URL : https://idjc.sourceforge.io/
* License : GPL2+
Programming Lang: C, Python
ld as much as possible from scratch, wouldn't it
make some sense to run dh_auto_configure an extra time before dh_auto_clean,
to ensure that the latter actually does something (which it otherwise
shouldn't have to, when building freshly unpacked source)?
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg..
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Holmgren
* Package name: libmail-authenticationresults-perl
Version : 1.20180923
Upstream Author : Marc Bradshaw
* URL : https://metacpan.org/release/Mail-AuthenticationResults
* License : Artistic or GPL 1
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Holmgren
* Package name: libnet-dns-resolver-mock-perl
Version : 1.20171219
Upstream Author : Marc Bradshaw
* URL : https://metacpan.org/pod/Net::DNS::Resolver::Mock
* License : Perl
Programming Lang: Perl
server running an old
lintian? The changelog of lintian 2.5.31 says "Allow debug packages without an
extended description.", and since they're generated automatically by debhelper
without entries in debian/control, we are not supposed to be required to add
such entries, are we?
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
binations of three or more packages that are
broken, something the dependency system can't handle. Declaring libnettle6 to
break rdeps known to be built against libnettle4 might be the best option but
then again there could be versions in backports with lower version numbers yet
buil
y that much
if it's forbidden, but on the other hand binutils is definitely not a proper
library package.)
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
s2 UI module uses libtar to unpack skins. Should be easy
to convert to libarchive.
Any thoughts?
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
hat...
Could also mean Intent To Hijack, but I think that's uncalled for.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
gt; WNPP.
>
> Bug#586422: RFA: x2vnc -- A dual-screen hack - link an MS-Windows and X...
I could perhaps take care of x2vnc. I use it at work and I also maintain
another VNC package.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
st be included into path?
>
> like
> flags/countires//16x10/
> flags/countires//24x15/
>
> etc?
Not all flags have the same aspect ratio.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
fies the amount of
> work.
Just introduce the new, looser type of dependency; all the packages that could
use it instead of Depends don't have to be changed at once.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
d-)depends-on-
essential-package-without-using-version check.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
s true for that database, and
> unregistering stuff from that database is no longer necessary.
Unless ucf is removed but not purged, right?
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
but merely to the application as such after installation.
Would a new package relationship, say "Post-Depends", be helpful?
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On lördagen den 19 september 2009, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 11:52:23PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > When a binary package is renamed or split, as well as if several packages
> > are merged under a new name, transitional packages are normally created,
&
On fredagen den 18 september 2009, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
> Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > I propose a new control field called e.g. Supersedes that will provide
> > the same semantics. In its simplest form, a renamed package will declare
> > that it Supersedes the old packa
atter should be upgraded into the former,
and that git the VCS is something else entirely.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Is doc-base lacking a section for SSH clients/servers and other remote control
software? Sure, you can transfer files and monitor other computers using SSH,
but that's not all you can do.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This
On tisdagen den 1 september 2009, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> currently there is the large mysql / octave / hdf* / nattle /
> ...-transition going on which includes about 170 source package
> changes and about 120 binary changes (recompilations) for every arch.
"nattle&qu
On måndagen den 24 augusti 2009, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2009-08-23 Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > On lördagen den 22 augusti 2009, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> >> Magnus Holmgren writes:
> >>> * Self-contained, no dependencies (except libc), thanks to code
> >&
On lördagen den 22 augusti 2009, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Magnus Holmgren writes:
> > * Self-contained, no dependencies (except libc), thanks to code
> > included from the PolarSSL project.
> >
> From a Debian perspective, that's a policy violation, not a feature!
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Holmgren
* Package name: pdkim
Version : 1.0
Upstream Author : Tom Kistner
* URL : http://duncanthrax.net/pdkim/
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : cryptographically identify the sender of
//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WP:POINT). I think it's a good policy that can
be applied in other contexts as well.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
le binary package?
It would be useful in some cases, however, to allow one source package to
generate more than one binary package by linking against each of a number of
mutually conflicting libraries (libkrb5 and heimdal, to name a real example).
But that would require quite big changes.
-
itable for inclusion in Debian?
I created a package some years ago, but abandoned the ITP. See
http://bugs.debian.org/352653 for reasons.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--enable-dsa2 --cert-digest-algo SHA256 or something?
Also, does gpg have an option to make it output the hash algorithms of key
(ID) signatures? I can't seem to find one.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On tisdagen den 28 april 2009, Noah Slater wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:04:05PM +1000, Ben Finney wrote:
> > Many of the more popular MUAs on your list have this command already,
>
> Can you name any others apart from mutt that come with this by default?
Kmail is one.
--
changes to how packages are built, but it might still be
meaningful to bring it up on -devel, which I've done now.
--
Magnus Holmgrenholmg...@debian.org
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
or the FHS mentions
this explicitly, possibly because there are very few such executables.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ssvnc
Version : 1.0.20
Upstream Author : Karl J. Runge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.karlrunge.com/x11vnc/ssvnc.html
* License : GPL 2
Program
!!!
Aw, shoot. Not that it's a good Idea to wait until the last minute, but since
you hadn't already done it by noon (CEST), I figured you'd do it right after
the next dinstall run.
But well, time to squash bugs and get the release out in a jiffy and begin
looking forward to the
On lördagen den 12 juli 2008, martin f krafft wrote:
> lenny+0.5 would logically be 5.5
Version strings are *not* floating-point numbers (i.e. e.g. 5.10 follows 5.9).
At least that's the school of thought Debian (dpkg --compare-versions)
subscribes to with regard to packages.
--
worked around. You can always use svn-buildpackage --svn-export.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On fredagen den 13 juni 2008, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > The downside is that a bug can't simply be downgraded from fixed to
> > patched; it would have to be marked found and patched in the same
> > version, but that
f a particular version is found to be both patched and fixed, then it is
considered fixed. The downside is that a bug can't simply be downgraded from
fixed to patched; it would have to be marked found and patched in the same
version, but that's hopefully a relatively rare situation.
--
tting a standard for
> that couldn't hurt.
Whatever the suffix, what do you say about always using '-' as the separator?
Remember that hyphens are allowed in upstream versions. Since hyphens are
generally used to separate upstream from downstream, it would more clearly
indicate
g similar packages by pointing out not only the strengths but
also the limitations and weaknesses.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
should be allowed to stay. Hmm, wouldn't that make Supersedes: a
reverse Depends: (or reverse Recommends, if that feels better)?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is b
onfig.sub update in package source tree,
> though that can be done in debian/rules.
I consistently use /usr/share/doc/dpatch/examples/dpatch/01_config.dpatch.gz,
do you do that too?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks
> deb http://ppa.launchpad.net/pkg-sphinx/ubuntu gutsy main
> deb-src http://ppa.launchpad.net/pkg-sphinx/ubuntu gutsy main
Monty, Marco, I think you may be working on the same piece of software without
being aware of it. Perhaps you can cooperate.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTE
file format were extended to include this information so that other
repositories than the official ones could make these files available in the
same manner).
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
le to use substitution variables in package names.
But if we forget about variable package names, wouldn't dpkg-substvars be a
good idea?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digita
On tisdagen den 2 oktober 2007, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 04:47:16PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > I'm taking over a package (pike7.6) that up to when it was orphaned got
> > an automated changelog entry each time the upstream build number was
&g
27;m
thinking about deleting those which don't correspond to an actual upload to
Debian. Would that be acceptable, or is debian/changelog _strictly_
prepend-only?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
signature.asc
Descrip
ted, and _that_ part happens automatically.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
e must of course make sure that dh_movefiles operates on the
packages in the correct order if using deliberately overlapping lists.)
I also note that dh_movefiles might do globbing in a different way and that it
doesn't actually move files (it copies and then removes the original)
--
Magnu
ight. It's their software, they own it, they can do whatever
> they like with it. *We* get no say in that matter.
On the other hand, Opera isn't asked to make their browser free software _for
Debian_, but for their users. Debian is not an end, but a means.
--
Magnus Holmgren
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: policyd-spf-fs
Version : 0+svn21
Upstream Author : Matthias Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.freestone.net/software/policyd-spf-fs/
* License :
I'm adopting. There the files are
separated, with symlinks from /usr/lib/pike to the corresponding
location under /usr/share/pike.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail
default. This is
not Windows. Here you can configure your software the way you want it.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpTwiADkSS75.pgp
Description: PGP signature
are fixed in *some* version are all
categorised as resolved, I think (which I think is usually adequate).
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabbl
On Sunday 29 July 2007 16:22, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> But: AFAIU, /etc/inetd.conf is now owned by any package, because it's used
Just to make myself clear: s/now/not/
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim
configuration is in place. Furthermore, other inet-superservers will want to
call update-inetd's update-inetd from their own update-inetd, to facilitate
switching from one inet-superserver to another. On the other hand, perhaps
that should be the administrator's decision: If they d
ckage names
list. There is an exception in policy for virtual package names
used "privately, amongst a cooperating group of packages", which the wims and
wims-related packages seem to be.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed,
On Monday 23 July 2007 18:47, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Jul 23, Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Packages containing servers that can be started from inetd should all
> > provide an xinetd configuration file in /etc/xinetd.d. They will
> > instantly
2/msg00446.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2006/08/msg01265.html
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpbA7JJO5e22.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 20 July 2007 12:19, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > It would be nice, I think, if the BTS would automatically notice
> > when a package has been removed from unstable and annotate the bugs
> > appropriately.
>
> It actu
happen, of course.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
pgpbFaTSRYi4I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
nk, if the BTS would automatically notice when a
package has been removed from unstable and annotate the bugs appropriately.
It can happen that a dead package chooses to walk the earth again, can't it
(not in these cases, but in some)?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
gt; example, I use these tools on a fairly routine basis on
> PlanetLab to control hundreds of machines spread around the
> world."
Um, but what does it *do*?
Answer: http://www.theether.org/pssh/docs/0.2.3/pssh-HOWTO.html#AEN38
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
read .desktop files directly; there is no need to convert them into .menu
files first (and really no reason to convert .menu to .desktop either).
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, wherea
bly be moved to the top level,
decreasing the depth by one for Apps even there, and leave the level of the
relatively few other entries the same, or maybe in some cases increased by
one.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpjZhQH0G5DU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
AIL PROTECTED] code
is free (as is the BOINC client itself), for example, and in that case
it's possible to package an optimized version. Otherwise the BOINC
client automatically downloads the right executable.
--
Magnus Holmgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
courage yet
> other people to fix things that aren't broken.
But things *are* broken.
>>> How about using these prefixes to unambiguously refer to powers of 10?
>>> kdkidi10^3
>>
>> Like in kidigram and medameter? What comes next, midroutopicans?
>
might be "3.2
GB", which is *not* a substitute for "3.2 GiB". Do you not agree that
rounding can be done to more than one significant digit?
--
Magnus Holmgren
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
rally
evolved, everyday word, which has *not* been universally defined (the
well-defined, scientific term would instead be lat. _Mus_ for the genus
or _Mus musculus_ for the species known as the common house mouse).
--
Magnus Holmgren
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o oversimplify facts and information to the point where
> "everyone" understands it, (If this happens they DO NOT understand it;
> they are given the illusion of understanding) or whether to educate
> the public. I am very convinced the correct solution is always to
> ed
of these
> help the situation.
The 1 440 KiB floppy is dead. Let it rest in pieces. The fact that a marketing
department screwed up long ago by thinking that 1 440 kB equals 1.44 MB,
which it would have done, had that really *been* 1 440 kB and not 1 440 KiB,
is not a case against IEC prefixe
t in base 2.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans
pgppaW9Zr6ibG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ts. I think it's to a big extent just a matter of
getting used to them.
Do you have anything to add that hasn't already been said?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpSvfcE221IF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 15:46, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 June 2007 14:57, Darren Salt wrote:
> > I demand that Josselin Mouette may or may not have written...
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > When I use a computer program, I don't want to wond
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 15:36, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 02:36:55PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > On Tuesday 12 June 2007 14:09, Adam Borowski wrote:
> > > English linguistic is a descriptive science -- what is correct and what
> > > is not
te), and 1 kbyte is exactly 1000 byte (can't be expressed exactly
as a decimal fraction in Kibyte, because 0.1 Kibyte is a non-integral number
of bytes). Hence, having two sets of prefixes to choose from depending on
what fits best is the best option.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL P
r "kibibyte" and 1.5 million hits for "kilobyte". That's
about 4%, not 0.3%. In fact, it's sufficiently widespread to earn a place in
dictionaries, IMHO.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpO8OlDyVBEq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
prefixes (in which case you can be pretty sure that if it *says* kB, they it
*means* kB) and/or clearly documents the change (e.g. in a legend).
So, just because some developers *might* do things wrong, that doesn't mean it
will surely happen.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgp8O7rhl7WEV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 08:54, Miles Bader wrote:
> Magnus Holmgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> No it doesn't.
> >>
> >> The "SI binary prefixes" are an abomination.
> >
> > Why - besides pronunciation?
>
> Well amon
you only have to say kibibyte when you need to be precise.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpEKOaSzboZ9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tuesday 12 June 2007 08:44, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 08:36:39AM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > That's an argument that's been heard before but it's *wrong*. SI prefixes
> > *are* used with non-SI units without losing their normal mean
and there is
no reason why bytes should be an exception. Since kilo has always meant 1000,
kilobyte must initially have meant 1000 bytes, before people started to use
it as if to mean 1024. There is confusion; hard drive manufacturers'
advertising material is not the only place where kilobyte
t, i.e. IEC
prefixes have to be rejected for not being a perfect solution.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perfect_solution_fallacy
> I don't like those Special Interest units in all situations ;)
SI units aren't special. They are universal.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
f 2 except if logarithmic scale for the bar graphs is
turned on. I think it would be better if it used powers of 10 throughout.
There is a comment: /* This 1024 vs 1000 stuff is just plain evil */
None of these put a space between the number and the unit, as is proper, but
that I don't think can
On Monday 11 June 2007 21:41, Joey Hess wrote:
> Alex Queiroz wrote:
> > On 6/11/07, Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >No, I hate that convention. K and k should only ever refer to 1024.
> >
> > Like in kg or km?
>
> This thread is about units
On Monday 11 June 2007 21:25, Joey Hess wrote:
> Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > You seem to fancy the K-is-1024--k-is-1000 convention
>
> No, I hate that convention. K and k should only ever refer to 1024.
In that case you're just sloppy. Prefixes and symbols for units
On Monday 11 June 2007 15:07, shirish wrote:
> Ugh,
>The second example I wanted to give was of libburnia
> http://libburnia-project.org/changeset/877 . Sorry
Uh, tell them that kiB should be KiB. Don't ask me why.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ding the "B" or "iB" in the field above would
> solve a real question.
In many cases the difference is insignificant. It's the consistent use of IEC
vs SI units everywhere that give the big benefits. Since the effort needed to
convert a piece of software is in the vast
s
> throughout the distribution as we do standadising the spelling of
> "colo[u]r" or "standardi[sz]e" throughout the distribution.
If everybody waits for somebody else to change first, then no change can ever
happen.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 11 June 2007 18:53, Miles Bader wrote:
> shirish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It isn't just ubuntu or debian but this needs to be done
> > everywhere.
>
> No it doesn't.
>
> The "SI binary prefixes" are an abominatio
t ?
> It isn't just ubuntu or debian but this needs to be done
> everywhere. Have something accurate.
I'm in favour! (But are you requesting that aptitude use SI prefixes
correctly, or that it use IEC (binary) prefixes?
--
Magnus Holmgren
pgpaVIzYUqkyh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
packages
or other cases where no real functionality is lost by not immediately
upgrading?
I'm not talking about a situation where a main package changes its dependency
on the old package name to the new package name, thereby causing the
transition to take place.
--
Magnus Holmgren[
, you must have misread the dh_installman manpage. You have to tell
dh_installman which manpages to install in which package, then dh_installman
looks at the .TH lines of those manpages and determines what sections to put
them in.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday 02 June 2007 14:58, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-06-01 at 18:03 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > Many applications allow their functionality to be extended by means of
> > plugins, often in the form of libraries that the application dlopen()s.
> > Us
fferent symbol to be referenced comes to mind. What else, if
symbols aren't versioned?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpCQBuAd0W6k.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thursday 31 May 2007 14:32, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Magnus Holmgren wrote, Thursday, May 31, 2007 1:04 PM
>
> > Situation: Two source packages collide in the namespace. The second
> > one gets rather awkward name. Later, the first package dies and is
> > removed fro
ns in
oldstable.
Question: Can the second source package take the first source package's (less
awkward) name, or does it have to wait until oldstable is archived?
Concrete example: lsh/lsh-utils (see bug 340354).
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of
On Wednesday 16 May 2007 14:52, Marcus Better wrote:
> Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > Now, how do you combine these? Several people have thought: "The VCS
> > can handle the changesets. Putting patches under VCS is silly!"
>
> I fully agree. Unfortunately Subversion do
ut the end result is a normal .diff.gz, meaning that
everyone else has to use stgit too to get all the benefits, right?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpce1QkD9DWi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
n patches. This should work well with the new W&P source
package format, and you get the best of both worlds. Maybe some of this is
already possible?
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpUUCyXgLchh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
easonable? But I agree that one of the pages should be
renamed, if only to make capitalization consistent.
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpkA1x3ZIwuO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
in the package each time the package is
upgraded.
http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#s10.9
--
Magnus Holmgren[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
pgpcUKFMrobgk.pgp
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
