Re: LCC and blobs

ent kernel configurations, so a boot loader or kernel package could reasonably have some sort of dependency on one of the firmwares. -- Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: LCC and blobs

Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 01:28:46AM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> >> I'm convinced enough. Some time ago, I was playing around with an >> >> emulator for Texas Instruments calculators. It obviously required a >

Re: LCC and blobs

Glenn Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 11:36:09PM +0100, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> > To me, that seems much like arguing that because an emulator (such as >> > one for a console system) provides a GUI, and because it can run and >> >

Re: GPL and command-line libraries

"Wesley W. Terpstra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Good evening! > > I'm developing an error-correcting code library which works on a lot of data > at once. Since the API is quite simple and the cost of process creation > relatively insignificant, I would like to provide a command-line API. > > I

Re: GPL and command-line libraries

gt; > What you call a derivative work is irrelevant; the only one that matters > is what copyright law calls a derivative work. Copyright law defines > derivative work, not licenses. Actually, copyright law talks a great deal about derivative works, without ever going to the trouble of defining them, which is what causes so much confusion. -- Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED]