Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0

1999-01-27 Thread Kragen Sitaker
7;s format, I suspect that mailboxes and access thereto would be considerably more complex and failure-prone. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kragen Sitaker <http://www.pobox.com/~kragen/> Computers are the tools of the devil. It is as simple as that. There is no monotheism strong enoug

Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0

1999-01-26 Thread Kragen Sitaker
system to ~/Mailbox is easy, btw. Switching a single multi-user system to ~/Mailbox is likely to cause a certain amount of pain. Distributing applications to millions of people, some of whom use one convention, and some of whom use another, is surely asking for trouble. -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Resolutions to comments on LSB-FHS-TS_SPEC_V1.0

1999-01-25 Thread Kragen Sitaker
uld stay fairly stable. Has anyone compared Linux's signal.h (the one that actually lists the signal numbers) to the signal.h from Version 6 Unix for the PDP-11? There are 22 years of difference, but it looks like about a year. :) -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kragen Sitaker <http://w