Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I either need help with this package to have a DD who can sponsor
uploads on a regular basis or I'll be forced to put link-grammar up
for adoption, becuase lacking a sponsor I haven't gotten a new version
into the archive in ages. (Despite the fact that I've been kee
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 01 juin 2009 à 16:26 +0200, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> > > What has the initramfs got to do with this?
> >
> > For / to be on LVM you need an initramfs. / on raid (with custom
> > kernel) or plain partition works without one.
>
> I already know that, than
Steffem Joeris wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 05:10:12 pm Romain Beauxis wrote:
> > Le Tuesday 07 April 2009 22:59:00 Sebastien Delafond, vous avez écrit :
> > > On Apr/07, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > While I see why it can be needed for python, I fail to see how it is
> > > > important for jruby...
>
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 19:48 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le lundi 20 avril 2009 à 19:13 +0200, Michael Biebl a écrit :
> > > Something that I ran this morning decided to pollute my home directory
> > > creating the following directories:
> > > Desktop/
> > > Documents/
> > > Download/
> > >
Package: general
Severity: normal
Something that I ran this morning decided to pollute my home directory
creating the following directories:
Desktop/
Documents/
Download/
Music/
Pictures/
Public/
Templates/
Videos/
I haven't figured out what it is yet, but Debian needs to be more
respectf
Could someone sponsor the latest version of link-grammar, version
4.3.2, for which I have uploaded at
http://lingcog.iit.edu/~bloom/link-grammar/
Thanks in advance.
--Ken
--
Ken (Chanoch) Bloom. PhD candidate. Linguistic Cognition Laboratory.
Department of Computer Science. Illinois Institute o
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: assogiate
Version : 0.2.1
Upstream Author : Kevin Daughtridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.kdau.com/projects/assogiate/
* License : GPL
Program
ct byhand builds? Do
they restrict sourceful uploads accompanied by binaries from the
offending archs?
--
Ken Bloom. PhD candidate. Linguistic Cognition Laboratory.
Department of Computer Science. Illinois Institute of Technology.
http://www.iit.edu/~kbloom1/
pgpTg1xg9HOI5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
cessary version even if it's not the top choice, but
only if the priority is higher than a given threshold (say 50).
Then normal users get experimental pinned at 1 as it is now, but the
experimental autobuilders get experimental pinned at 51 using
/etc/apt/preferences.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
to fix this problem now that we are stuck with this
> random, unmotivated, undocumented, likely-to-break-things change. Oh, and
> I'd like the head of whoever changed it while I'm at it. :-)
Yes, it would have been nice to have been told. Actually, we were told
on debain-devel
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 10:53:04PM -0600, Adam M. wrote:
>
>>Ken Bloom wrote:
>>
>>>I noticed that glabels is broken on i386 because it's not binary NMU
>>>safe, and someone did a binary NMU.
>
>
>>>After poking
Ken Bloom wrote:
> Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
>>[Ken Bloom]
>>
>>
>>>$substvar{'Source-Version'}= $fi{"L Version"};
>>>+#Indep-Version is for supporting binary NMUs when a strict
>>>+#version dependancy is requir
Peter Samuelson wrote:
> [Ken Bloom]
>
>> $substvar{'Source-Version'}= $fi{"L Version"};
>>+#Indep-Version is for supporting binary NMUs when a strict
>>+#version dependancy is required against an arch independant package
>&
/\+b[0-9]+$//;
}
This patch adds the Indep-Version substitution variable, which will be
the version number on the arch-independant packages corresponding to the
current verision of the other binary packages.
I'm not sure where to submit this, or whether there's a bug open for i
Paul TBBle Hampson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 12:16:36PM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
>
>>Paul TBBle Hampson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Maybe the one-true-stable-key idea is the way to go after all...
>
>
>>One key by distribution?
>
>
> Well, I meant a different one for each stab
patch the brokenness, submit the patch to bug 342892.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". T
ng for "callwave remove" we
get a page on lists.debian.org:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/01/msg01444.html
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:13:23AM -0600, Ken Bloom wrote:
>
>>Why not accept the AMD64 binaries, then dump the AMD64 binaries because
>>you don't know what to do with them, but accept the arch:all debs from
>>that upload?
>
>
>
cally
> there are problems. I sure hope patches would be welcome though.
Why not accept the AMD64 binaries, then dump the AMD64 binaries because
you don't know what to do with them, but accept the arch:all debs from
that upload?
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as
Shaun Jackman wrote:
> In the following email Chris suggests that I add support for bit
> torrent magnet:// URLs under Gnome2 in the Azureus package by setting
> the gconftool-2 parameter /desktop/gnome/url-handlers/magnet/command
> to call Azureus. This seems like a pretty reasonable thing to do,
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Nov 06, Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>So I'll ask again. What would be the process for rename i386 to x86 or ia32?
>
> Complex enough that it will never happen, so please do not waste more
> time over this.
Thanks fo
Bastian Venthur wrote:
> Ken Bloom wrote:
>
>
>>Bastian Venthur wrote:
>>
>>>Nick Jacobs wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>In-Reply-To=<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>
>>>>You mean, it's seriously been proposed
y if
> someone asks you for the sources.
>
> If you keep the binary to yourself, you don't have to release anything.
And you don't have to tell the original developers about your
improvements either, even if you are distributing the code. You can let
them search the *whole* i
64) would suppress discussions like this
> in the future?
We should either rename i386, or resupport i386, or both.
We know what steps it takes ot resupport i386. What kind of work would
be needed to rename i386 to x86 or ia32?
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included
27;ed (and
is indeed more permissive to developers than the GPL) we needed some
guidelines for what could be accepted and what couldn't. Hence, the DFSG.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: link-grammar
Version : 4.1b
Upstream Author : Daniel Sleator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Davy Temperley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John Lafferty
I'm tracking through some old bugs I submitted, cleaning up. I'd like
to close bug 256715, because jpilot and gtk-engines-smooth no longer
interact (because jpilot uses GTK+2 now). What's the appropriate
version to specify to the BTS?
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG di
s, some internal support
> to make cookies plausible, a couple of new members to the BTS team,
> maybe some other stuff I've forgotten...
The only new stuff that seems to be documented in the help files for BTS
is the version tracking stuff. Everything else (bug subscriptions, user
tag
ty.
Firefox is probably the most important piece of Linux software that
actually has name recognition out there in the rest of the world, and I
don't think that we can drop it *or* rebrand it.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://w
Too bad it is only an April fool joke...
>
> Cheers,
Look again at bugs.debian.org/release-critical, or the automatic mail of
release-critical bugs that gets sent out every Friday. At the very least,
this last part is true.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r by just running
linux 2
(assuming linux was the name of your normal stanza)
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
o decode encrypted dvd;
> ffmpeg and OpenDivx code to en/decode MPEG4.
>
> Solution:
> the DeCSS is deleted from the package proposed for Debian
What functionality do we lose by doing this?
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http:/
ots immediately in your postinst.
When do the other 11 postinst's run?
Besides the philosophical problems with rebooting without permission,
the administrator action that you're trying to avoid will be necessary
*anyway* when he has to apt-get -f install or dpkg --configure -a the
other
ody should backport a
package in such a way that it is buildable with woody's build-essential.
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http://www.gnupg.org/ for info about these digital signatures.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 09:18:49 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> On 2005-01-11 Ken Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I just upgraded to cdrecord version 2.01+01a01-2.[1] I found that with
>> permissions -rwsr-xr-- on /usr/bin/cdrecord [2] that I was able to
>> record a
I just upgraded to cdrecord version 2.01+01a01-2.[1]
I found that with permissions -rwsr-xr-- on /usr/bin/cdrecord [2] that
I was able to record a CD without having to become root first using
dev=/dev/hdc and kernel 2.6.10 [3].
Do any others still have problems burning CD's as non-root with
kerne
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 04:16:49 -0800, Stephen Birch wrote:
> Paul van der Vlis([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2005-01-04 14:40:
>> Hello,
>>
>> One of the biggest disadvantages of Debian for me is the long time it
>> takes for a new stable version.
>
> I guess one man's meat is another man's poison.
>
> Sinc
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:04:37 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 08:08:47PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
>> Ken Bloom wrote:
>> > http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the
>> > ReleaseProposals topic on wiki.debian.net) discusses the conc
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:36:11 +1100, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 10:16:27AM -0800, Ken Bloom wrote:
>> http://wiki.debian.net/?RunDinstallHourly (part of the ReleaseProposals
>> topic on wiki.debian.net) discusses the concept of speeding up the
>> relea
release Sarge (barring any unforseen consequences). Would it be possible
to start testing this proposal out now by increasing the frequency of
dinstall, perhaps to once every 6 hours until release?
--Ken Bloom
--
I usually have a GPG digital signature included as an attachment.
See http
Is it possible to upgrade GPM in unstable to 1.20.1 (at least) which has
been out for a long time now. It would fix a lot of brokenness in GPM.
There was a previous discussion in March about this topic, nothing ever
came of it.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200303/msg0074
41 matches
Mail list logo
