Re: actively notifying users of removed packages

2008-03-11 Thread Karl Chen
> On 2008-03-11 06:52 PDT, Lucas Nussbaum writes: Lucas> If you are only interested in a few packages, you could Lucas> subscribe to them on the PTS. I recently worked on a Lucas> script to notify PTS subscribers ('summary' keyword) Lucas> when the package is orphaned or remove

actively notifying users of removed packages

2008-03-11 Thread Karl Chen
Hi, I would like to bring up the issue of removed packages. I think it is problematic that sometimes packages get removed, with no automatic transition [a transitional package, or another package depending on a replacement package or conflicting with the old one], and no active notification to th

Re: Partition, LVM, and RAID management utility

2005-08-10 Thread Karl Chen
> On 2005-08-10 17:06 PDT, Shaun Jackman writes: Shaun> My sense of it is that there isn't a tool packaged in Shaun> Debian to fill this need -- although feel free to give Shaun> suggestions at this point. Evms is the best all-in-one tool for disk management I've found. However, D

Re: is it a bug to not depend on a library package needed for some binary?

2005-07-18 Thread Karl Chen
> On 2005-07-17 14:00 PDT, Matthew Woodcraft writes: Matthew> There is a lot of discussion of this question in bug Matthew> 119517 (where the conclusion reached was that this is Matthew> sometimes ok). Wow, that was a long thread. Thanks for the pointer. I will file bugs if it t

is it a bug to not depend on a library package needed for some binary?

2005-07-17 Thread Karl Chen
Suppose package P contains files /usr/bin/B1 and /usr/bin/B2. B1 is the important program, and B2 is not as important. Is it OK for the declared package dependencies to not satisfy all the run-time shared library dependencies of B2? What if they are listed in Suggests? I have found many such p

Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb

2005-03-23 Thread Karl Chen
> On 2005-03-23 11:44 PST, Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: Jeroen> I assume you use 'debdiff' that actually does those Jeroen> list you the differences in file lists? And also Jeroen> differences in dependencies, if a recompile introduces Jeroen> another dependency, it is worth f

Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb

2005-03-23 Thread Karl Chen
> On 2005-03-23 16:33 PST, Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: >> I didn't know about debdiff - that would have saved me from >> basically re-implementing it. Jeroen> Common problem unfortunately in the open source/Debian Jeroen> world... not that $what_you_want doesn't exist, but

Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb

2005-03-23 Thread Karl Chen
> On 2005-03-22 20:13 PST, Jeroen van Wolffelaar writes: Jeroen> I think it'd be good to ship sarge without such Jeroen> situations, but again, this needs to be looked into on Jeroen> a case-by-case basis, and I certainly dare not say Jeroen> that every such case must be a bug

Re: discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb

2005-03-23 Thread Karl Chen
> On 2005-03-23 01:17 PST, Frank KÃster writes: fant> What do you do to look at the differences? I'm just doing a diff between the list of files produced (the thing I'm doing changes compiled output files anyway) - so timestamps shouldn't affect anything. Some of them just produce differ

discrepancies between uploaded and source-built .deb

2005-03-22 Thread Karl Chen
Hi, I'm doing something that involves building every Debian package, and I'm finding (usually minor) discrepancies between what I build from source packages, and the binary packages uploaded by maintainers. I'm building each package in its own chroot which contains only the minimum packages (bo