On 11/29/2016 03:41 PM, Christian Seiler wrote:
(Forwarding because I forgot to Cc debian-devel@.)
ondir is a small program to automate tasks specific to certain
directories. It works by executing scripts in directories when
you enter and leave them. It may be used to set environment
variables o
On 26.08.2015 21:08, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
>> Specific issues:
>> - for i386, there is still sold new hardware with 32bit-only. Are
>> there open issues for i386 (apart from the 32bit-generic ones)?
>> Discussion that we need to get rid of it one day should be started.
>
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> IMO dpkg-buildpackage should assume yes, in the same way it assumes
> packages are cross-buildable, and we don't go around marking them as
> such. But I guess for Debian that depends on how much of our packaging
> and upstream build systems
On 23.11.2014 23:11, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 23/11/14 17:55, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> Unfortunately, on my x86-64 laptop, my patched liblzo2 with
>> -DLZO_CFG_NO_UNALIGNED on all architectures seems to be half as fast as
>> the unpatched one
> [...]
>> I'm trying out a slightly different approac
On 21.11.2014 18:01, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Felipe Sateler , 2014-11-21, 14:04:
>> Sparc is definitely not ok. For evidence, see #721617, liblo was
>> trying to fetch a double from a 4-byte aligned address. Experience
>> with liblo shows that other architectures are just fine (or at least
>> are jus
On 07.10.2014 08:07, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>
>> apps becomes huge in size
>
> I wonder if LTO would help with the size issues, theoretically all the
> code from the static glibc that isn't used by busybox-static would be
> stripped out of the re
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Quoting Julian Taylor (2014-07-07 14:14:20)
>
>> If so that might explain why your pass2 did not remove these, but so far I
>> know we have no way to declare this state in our control, we only have
&g
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Johannes Schauer wrote:
>
> Can you spot obvious mistakes in the results or in the procedure used to
> generate them?
>
There seem to be a bunch of false positives for virtual/metapackages:
==> python-numpy_1.8.1-1.arch-all.unusedbd <==
gfortran=4:4.8.2-4
python-
On 10.06.2014 00:45, Leo Singer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In healpix-cxx, I'm getting warnings from dh_shlibdeps about missing OpenMP
> symbols. See, for example, this excerpt from
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=healpix-cxx&arch=i386&ver=3.11.2-6&stamp=1401836504:
>
>> dpkg-shlibdeps:
On 01.06.2014 05:39, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 01, 2014 at 12:37:18AM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>> ]] Steve Langasek
>
>>> FWIW, the recent port of Ubuntu to ppc64el uses -O3 as the default, because
>>> IBM has broad experience in resolving performance issues for their own
>>> hardw
On 30.05.2014 09:40, Xavier Roche wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 11:10:29AM +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
>> In particular -O3 turns on auto-vectorisation. It can provide a big
>> speed up to programs that can take advantage of it
> [...]
>> As others have pointed our -O3 turns on optimisations t
On 14.04.2014 14:26, Raphael Geissert wrote:
> Russ Allbery wrote:
>> Shachar Shemesh writes:
>>> Do you really want to get a "Warning: signed integer overflow yields
>>> undefined behavior" on this function?
>>
>> I would certainly like to be able to enable such a thing. I write a lot
>> of code
On 12.03.2014 16:47, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
> Also archive size, for what it's worth.
>
> Shipping GBs of DLLs, minified JS and other sourceless nonsense
> is totally a waste of everyone's time and storage space.
this is not a good argument, the best you can usually get out of
upstreams it to s
On 06.02.2014 01:58, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
>> Which CGI are we talking about? Perhaps we can give more specific advice.
>
> I guess you mean Online Python Tutor (#737732).
>
> Looking at the git repo, it includes a lot of embedded code copies of
>
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 06:09:51PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> > I advise to use the schroot runner instead. schroots are easy to set
> > up these days with mk-sbuild, and with some additional love (like
> > installing and configuring apt-c
On 06.02.2014 00:39, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to add some optimization flags for amd64 arch in some
> packages (mostly LV2 nad LADSPA plugins).
> I found these as candidates for amd64 arch:
>
> -msse
> -msse2
> -mfpmath=sse
this is enabled by default on amd64
> -ffast-
On 16.01.2014 19:37, Bálint Réczey wrote:
> Hi Bastien,
>
> 2014/1/15 Bastien ROUCARIES :
>> Hi,
>
>>
>> Moreover lintian detect minified javascript (based on extension).[4]
>> I am slowly manually checking if source is present and fill bug when
>> appropriate.
>> I plan to detect more minified ja
On 30.09.2013 16:58, Eric Dorland wrote:
> Doing a rebuild is something I could try for next time. I'm not really
> familiar with how to do that though, can you point me in the right
> direction? What sort of lintian checks did you have in mind?
At minimum the packages using Werror should be test
On 29.09.2013 14:08, Olе Streicher wrote:
> Paul Wise writes:
>> On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Olе Streicher wrote:
>>> While the library is architecture specific, the pkgconfig file is not.
>
>> Looks like it is to me, which is what lintian is complaining about:
>> [...]
>> libdir=${prefix}/l
On 08.09.2013 16:40, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Vincent Bernat
>
> * Package name: binaryornot
> Version : 0.1.1
> Upstream Author : Audrey Roy
> * URL : https://github.com/audreyr/binaryornot
> * License : BSD
> Prog
On 05/07/2013 03:25 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
...
== binutils ==
binutils 2.23.2 will be uploaded to unstable after GCC 4.8 as the
default on x86 reaches testing. Later updates will introduce binutils
trunk leading to 2.24, later this year.
fyi, this change will introduce a couple new FTBF
On 04.05.2013 11:10, Wookey wrote:
>
> I am huge fan of both building in clean environments _and_ being able
> to build twice. I don't think there is any solution to this other than
> testing it in an automated fashion. An sbuild or pbuilder option for
> --build-twice would make testing a very sim
On 25.04.2013 18:01, Alessandro Ghedini wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Owner: Alessandro Ghedini
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-p...@lists.debian.org
>
> * Package name: libzmq-libzmq2-perl
> Version : 1.07
> Upstream Author : Daisuke Maki
> *
On 05/10/2012 05:53 PM, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: "Harlan Lieberman-Berg"
>
> Package name: libzeromq-perl
> Version:0.21
> Upstream Author:Daisuke Maki
> URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/ZeroMQ/
> License:
On 04/09/2012 01:37 PM, TANIGUCHI Takaki wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 09 Apr 2012 13:30:49 +0200
>>>>>> jtaylor.deb...@googlemail.com(Julian Taylor) said:
>
>> what is the advantage of this over the ordered dictionary which is
>> builtin wheezy&
On 04/09/2012 04:01 AM, TANIGUCHI Takaki wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Owner: tak...@debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: python-odict
> Version : 1.4.4
> Upstream Author : BlueDynamics Alliance
> * URL or Web page : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/odict
> * License :
On 03/02/2012 05:53 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 09:12:16AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 09:58:23PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
>>> Kees Cook writes:
>>>
Speaking to the false positives problem, I've discussed with some people
the idea of having b
amic version will be so much slower
when its running.
You might be able to reduce startup time by only linking against the
libraries you need or lazyly dynamically loading them.
using ld --as-needed is the solution for the former, but see bug 633567
for problems with this.
Best Regards,
Julian Taylor
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
.
I think all these points warrant a little duplicate functionality in the
archive.
Best Regards,
Julian Taylor
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Julian Taylor
* Package name: keepass2
Version : 2.15 (not yet released)
Upstream Author : Dominik Reichl
* URL : http://keepass.info/
* License : GPL-2+
Programming Lang: C#
Description : ITP: keepass2
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 03:10 +0300, Stanislav Maslovski wrote:
> Hi debian-devel,
>
> I wanted to ask this for quite a long time: Does aptitude (I think
> apt-get does the same) really have to lock "the status database area"
> when _downloading_ packages?
>
> For example, I am running an update on
31 matches
Mail list logo
