[juht...@iki.fi: Are you MIA?]

arded message from Juhapekka Tolvanen - Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 19:48:23 +0300 From: Juhapekka Tolvanen To: f...@debian.org Cc: bo...@thomasjensen.com Subject: Are you MIA? Reply-To: Juhapekka Tolvanen Message-ID: <20120810164823.ga1...@juhtolv.dyndns.org> Organization: What?+ Me organize

Is Jason Thomas MIA

It has come to my attention, that Jason Thomas has grossly neglected maintaining his Debian-packages. Especially outrageous state of a package called tidy makes me very disappointed. Latest version he has packaged is 20051018, but according to CVS-server latest released upstream version is 2007091

Re: RFP: intellisense.vim - Intellisense for Vim

On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, +00:45:17 EET (UTC +0200), Martin Pitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys: > On 2003-12-05 19:34 +0200, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: normal > > http://insenvim.sourceforge.net/front.php > > I took at the so

Re: Who b0rked my Ghostscript and fonts?

On Wed, 23 Apr 2003, +20:27:07 EEST (UTC +0300), Michael Fedrowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys: > On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 12:02:00PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: > > FontPath"/usr/share/fonts/truetype/freefont" > > FontPath

Who b0rked my Ghostscript and fonts?

I have Debian Woody with gazillion packages from testing and unstable. Recently Ghostscript has worked very unreliably. For example ps2pdf gives this kind of errors: Error: /invalidfont in findfont Operand stack: Fg 139 --nostringval-- 1290 10 --nostringval-- 1290 6 --nostringva

GDM is ancient version

Package: gdm Version: 2.2.5.5-2 That version of gdm is fscking ancient! maintainer of that package really needs a clue. I got version 2.4.1.3-1woody1 with these apt-lines: deb http://ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/mirrors.evilgeniuses.org.uk/debian/backports/woody/ gnome2.2/ deb http://mirror.raw.no/ g

old lib still needed

% netscape netscape: error while loading shared libraries: libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory That is Netscape 4.8 and I still need it to testing my WWW-pages. In testing and unstable that file is inside none of those packages. In stable (Woody) i

Re: How to get rid of non-free packers?

On Sat, 24 Aug 2002, +05:00:59 EEST (UTC +0300), Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys: > On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 04:01:15PM +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen wrote: > > It is not very bad thing if we can't create archives in formats like > > ACE, ARJ, LHA or RAR wit

Re: How to get rid of non-free packers?

On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, +21:51:59 EEST (UTC +0300), Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys: > On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, +16:01:15 EEST (UTC +0300), > Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys: > Docs about format of LHA or LZH is here: > &g

Re: How to get rid of non-free packers?

On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, +16:01:15 EEST (UTC +0300), Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys: Wow! wotsit.org have some docs about archive file formats, too: http://www.wotsit.org/search.asp?s=archive http://www.wotsit.org/search.asp?page=2&s=archive Docs about format

Re: How to get rid of non-free packers?

On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, +19:26:12 EEST (UTC +0300), Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed some keys: > > So, where is that public-domain software for extracting ZOO-files? > > Somebody must find it and then create Debian-package of it. IMHO > > creating new ZOO-archives is not very important for us

How to get rid of non-free packers?

When I run command "vrms" in my Debian GNU/Linux, most of those non-free packages it finds are packers and/or unpackers. How about you? I like to listen to music modules made under Amiga and many of those modules are distributed in Aminet as LHA-archives. Sometimes I use DOS and its software may b

Software of BeOpen is resurrected at SourceForge

Some time ago I told, that a company called BeOpen is no more. Well, I just found, that their software is available at SourceForge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/infodock/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/hyperbole/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/oo-browser/ -- Juhapekka "naula" Tolvanen * *

Qt goes GPL

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/09/04/134218&mode=thread http://freshmeat.net/news/2000/09/04/968126399.html http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reports/2269/1/ http://www.trolltech.com/company/announce/generalpl.html If that will become true, I'll stop whining about its licence. --

Re: imap mailbox killer

On Thu, 31 Aug 2000, +00:52:25 EEST (UTC +0300), Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> pressed these keys: > Package: imap > Version: 4.7c-1 > > (Juhapekka Tolvanen's messages may be found on these mailing lists: > debian-devel@lists.debian.org,debian-legal@lists.debian.org) > > Man, you

Re: XEmacs/GTK 21.1.11

Aaron Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, that on Tue, 29 Aug 2000, +02:34:41 EEST (UTC +0300) pressed these keys: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 07:34:11PM -0400, James LewisMoss wrote: > > >>>>> On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 00:31:11 +0300, Juhapekka Tolvanen <[EMAIL > > >

Security of Debian SuX0r?

I don't subscribe to these lists, but I am smart enough to use archives of these mailing-lists in www. And you can Cc: to me, if you want. * * * Have you guys and girls seen this? What do you think about it? http://www.securityportal.com/closet/ Debian 2.2 Kurt Seifried "August 30, 2000 - I

I propose gazillion packages (LONG)

First I'd like to tell, that I don't subscribe to debian-devel, but I can read its archives from WWW. And I am not a Debian developer. I propose these packages to be added to Debian GNU/Linux. I have proposed them once before, but they are not yet added. **