Re: Package mailutils provides mailx but do not implement command Mail

2021-06-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 03:48:01PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:46:10AM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > Does this fix qualify for bullseye? > Please read > https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html#appropriate and > decide which c

Re: Package mailutils provides mailx but do not implement command Mail

2021-06-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 05:11:25PM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 01:08:09PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > > > > > package amanda-server uses a command named "Mail" to send email > > > > > Does it? Was the fix for http

Re: Package mailutils provides mailx but do not implement command Mail

2021-06-21 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 10:10:39AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 08:59:47PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 12:34:19AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 08:12:42PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrot

Re: Package mailutils provides mailx but do not implement command Mail

2021-06-20 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 12:34:19AM +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > On Sun, Jun 20, 2021 at 08:12:42PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > package amanda-server uses a command named "Mail" to send email > Does it? Was the fix for https://bugs.debian.org/475771 reverted? >

Package mailutils provides mailx but do not implement command Mail

2021-06-20 Thread Jose M Calhariz
rg/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990080 Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- As pessoas mudam através do que alcançam --Wystan Hugh Auden signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: uploaded but not processed

2018-07-28 Thread Jose M Calhariz
e NEW queue. So they can wait until next keyring update or is best to request that a ftp master to move them out of the way? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- Todos nós procuramos o sucesso, mas ninguém sabe como ele é --Robert Redford

Crossgrading in stretch

2017-07-11 Thread Jose M Calhariz
. Some problems with mate but nothing major. As my environment is now a mix 32bits/64bits I have some problems that I will submit bug reports after I understand better the multiarch. For now I just want to share my experience. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- Fatos não cessam de existir

Re: Can not disable lintian Information hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/at

2016-06-30 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 08:46:54PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 at 16:31:43 +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:59:39PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > > Please verify that the CPPFLAGS are passed to the compiler (a lot of > >

Re: Can not disable lintian Information hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/at

2016-06-30 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:59:39PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Jose M Calhariz: > > Hi, > > > > I am investigating why I can turn off the lintian information > > hardening-no-fortify-functions. In the beginning of my debian/rules I > > have: > > >

Can not disable lintian Information hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/bin/at

2016-06-30 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, I am investigating why I can turn off the lintian information hardening-no-fortify-functions. In the beginning of my debian/rules I have: export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=hardening=+all What I am doing wrong? How can I debug if the hardening is really on the binaries? The complete lintian me