sk these questions. If that
is the case please direct me to the right place. Also I know there are
people working on packaging enlightenment for the project, I am just
trying to do this out of my own curiousity.
Thanks in advance,
--
John Holland
jholl...@vin-dit.org
gpg public key ID 0x9551CF2D
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
How about something completely different: Enlinghtenment?
No, I'm not kidding
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTPz/PAAoJEPCIPbSVUc8t+JMH/j+XBHlroA4pXgEFtzWl2FuI
Ah18G6h5kbdqNQgEabwX/sQDCY15ThxM/W
I set up my repo with debarchiver. Is mini-dinstall a better way to go?
Maybe I should redo it that way?
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:56:20 -0600
Jeff Epler wrote:
> If you have a local apt repository (e.g., with dput and
> mini-dinstall), then after building each package you would install it
> to y
r given
at enlightenment.org due to dependencies.
Advice on how to do this right would be welcome!
John
n Wed, 12 Feb 2014 19:26:00 -0500
John Holland wrote:
> I thought they would be set up automatically when I made the repo. I
> just tried to get source with apt-get source from my repo and it
ote:
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:51 PM, John Holland
> wrote:
>
> > I got some debs built for E 18 not 17 gby oing from the source on
> > enlightenment.org and building them on Wheezy. They've been working
> > pretty well for me on a couple machines.
> >
I got some debs built for E 18 not 17 gby oing from the source on
enlightenment.org and building them on Wheezy. They've been working
pretty well for me on a couple machines.
You might want to look at the E18 situation because many of the
dependencies for E17 have been combined into one tarball th
6 matches
Mail list logo