Guilherme de S. Pastore, on 2005-02-08, 11:08, you wrote:
> >
> > fam - the file alteration monitor
> > binaries: fam libfam0c102 libfam-dev
> > state: works but lots of bugs and lots of unhappy users
> > complaining about fam's attitude towards removable media
> >
Hi *,
I have neither time for nor interest in maintaining the following
packages any more. Before quality suffers too much I'd like to give
them into more careful hands.
fam - the file alteration monitor
binaries: fam libfam0c102 libfam-dev
state: works but lots of bugs and lots of
Will Newton, on 2004-12-02, 19:57, you wrote:
> On Thursday 02 Dec 2004 07:35, Neil McGovern wrote:
>
> > Ok, Yes, if push comes to shove, I'll be happy to stand trial for the
> > inclusion of hot-babe in main.
>
> I can't see how that choice is yours to make.
Seen his name?
SCNR,
Joerg
--
Christian Perrier, on 2004-12-02, 07:53, you wrote:
> As already written in -women, this is the point which saddens me the
> most in this thread. I'm really disappointed by seeing most
> contributors just not realize why this package, as proposed, is likely
> to hurt the feelings of several women (
Maciej Dems, on 2004-12-02, 00:39, you wrote:
> It solves only one-small-package-problem, not the more general issue.
So what are the common moral values of 1100 plus Debian Developers from
all over the world?
> My suggestion (though I am not a DD) is to create the archive simmilar to
> non-us,
Ron Johnson, on 2004-12-02, 02:13, you wrote:
> Are there any such FPS' in Debian? nethack is there, but the
> violence is imagined, not in your face.
Now what is worse? Think about it.
Joerg
--
Joerg "joergland" Wendland | http://www.wendlandnet.de/joerg/
GPG: 51CF8417 FP: 79C0 7671 AFC7 31
Ron Johnson, on 2004-12-02, 02:35, you wrote:
> Ok, let's look at case law:
Yeah, non-us take two, now! Since US law does not affect other countries
(at least until now, thank God) let's put such stuff into non-us. This server
(I'd be happy to sponsor hardware and bandwith) could then be blocked
Nick, *,
Nick Pavlica, on 2003-12-17, 16:28, you wrote:
> I'm trying to find a distribution that would be
> willing to add Lustre file system support (it requires
> a kernel patch). If this group is interested, then I
> may be able to gather some resources to help add the
> support. It has rec
Fabian Fagerholm, on 2003-12-04, 20:47, you wrote:
> The way Debian Enterprise has been described, it would provide you with
> this option. But you may also want to move "apt-get install samba" and
> the related session of tweaking samba's options to suit your network, to
> the install phase. Imagi
Zenaan Harkness, on 2003-12-03, 14:58, you wrote:
> To give limits to Debian Enterprise/ User Linux we need to define some
> areas of focus.
>
> Flavours (and sub-flavours/ tasks/ yadda) is as good a place to start as
> any. So here are some proposed flavours:
>
> - Enterprise (base packages and
Fabian Fagerholm, on 2003-12-02, 22:58, you wrote:
> Debian is the super-project.
> XYZ is a Debian Subproject,
> which provides the flavors A, B and C.
>
> Opinions?
I like that though my in opinion flavors should only exist as
specialized installers, specialized kernels and pack
Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader, on 2003-11-19, 14:32, you wrote:
> * Ingo Juergensmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-11-16 15:40]:
> > > Yes, a fairly powerful machine has recently been donated to Debian and
> > > we're currently working out where to host it.
> >
> > Where is it located?
>
martin f krafft, on 2003-11-17, 16:15, you wrote:
> They will not publish this text on their own webpage, so the only
> way in which we can profit off this is if there is a place on
> www.d.o to publish it. Is there? Or should I tell them that they
> better spend their time doing other stuff (for D
Hi Andres, *,
Andres Salomon, on 2003-11-17, 01:45, you wrote:
> If folks are at all interested in this sort of thing, please let me know.
I am. We (the company I am employed with) are running Debian
installations in "Enterprise" environments with focus on HA (failover,
replication und such).
Steve McIntyre, on 2003-10-20, 15:42, you wrote:
> Ah, OK. For some reason I was expecting it to be in July. Having my
> 30th birthday in Brazil sounds like a cool idea...
So you'll be inviting us to your birthday party in Brazil? When you
charter that plane you'll even get a birthday present fro
Hi,
fam (of which I am the maintainer) stopped working properly on PPC (see
the bug report from the subject). I suspect this has something to do
with the way glibc handles SIGRT* signals. As of libc6 2.3.1 I head to
link fam against -lrt and -lpthread for those signals to work, and it
did work.
Anthony Towns, on 2003-09-03, 14:26, you wrote:
> What Steve said. Also, /var/lib is the default place for dynamically
> created stuff that doesn't have somewhere else to go.
What about /var/lib/package/bin (kind of qmail-style)?
Joerg
--
Joerg "joergland" Wendland
GPG: 51CF8417 FP: 79C0 7671 A
Hi,
when looking at [0] I see the following about my python-bz2:
> python/python-bz2_1.1-6: Failed by buildd-caballero [optional:out-of-date]
> Reasons for failing:
> [Category: none]
> bug #181674, missing build dep on bzip2
> Previous state was Building until 2003 Aug 13 11:47:54
Do
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-02
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: msession
Version : 1.21
Upstream Author : Mark L. Woodward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.mohawksoft.com/
* License : GPL, LGPL
Description : session data ma
Fabio Massimo Di Nitto, on 2003-07-31, 21:04, you wrote:
> nice to start together. If you force overlapping days than you force
> people to choose something when there is no reason to and noone can be in
> two places at the same time ;)
Did Joey still not manage to implement fork(2)?
SCNR, Joerg
Gerfried Fuchs, on 2003-07-29, 13:32, you wrote:
> I'd like to start organizing the debconf for the year 2005 in Vienna,
Yeah, great!
Joerg
--
Joerg "joergland" Wendland
GPG: 51CF8417 FP: 79C0 7671 AFC7 315E 657A F318 57A3 7FBD 51CF 8417
pgpeYxNbqoJy1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Colin Watson, on 2003-07-29, 09:14, you wrote:
> I think it's better for interested parties to look at this information
> themselves:
So what about adding a small paragraph to the RC bugs mail reading
something like: "If you want to help in improving Debian's quality please
consider having a look
Wichert Akkerman, on 2003-04-12, 22:02, you wrote:
> * Logging in on quantz (the machine running Alioth) is slow. Very slow.
>
> It seems that OpenLDAP as running on quantz is not very fast. We are
> already using all the useful indices on the LDAP database and using
> nscd, but especially i
[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 2002-01-12, 00:39, you wrote:
> What is the most common toolkit
> that YOU use for x11 development?
Consider using wxWindows. I use it primarily with Python but its native
form is C++. It wraps GTK+ on *NIX boxen but it is a cross-platform
tool kit that enables you to create
Will Lowe, on 2002-01-11, 16:12, you wrote:
> Err, the security implications of such a scheme are kinda
> imposing.
Of course you are right.
> Simpler to use an existing tool like ssh to do the
> authentication. I have a network of ~80 Debian boxen, and I do
> something rougly like this:
>
> f
Hi fellows,
today I heard about OpenPGK[1] and read its feature list. Unfortunately
OpenPKG describes itself as "...the world of cross-platform RPM-based Unix
software packaging". It is RPM based but cross-platform. It came to my
mind that having a distributed APT would be a great help to administ
Hi,
Leon Breedt, on 2002-01-09, 12:42, you wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 02:16:19AM -0800, David D.W. Dowey wrote:
> > I'm willing to take the libpam-pgsql if you are willing to assign it to me.
> Go for it. If you want to take ownership of the code, I'd be very happy
> as well :)
I am the aut
Petter Reinholdtsen, on 2002-01-05, 22:49, you wrote:
> * fam/hppa unsatisfiable Depends: libstdc++3 (>=
> 1:3.0.3-0pre011215) ['gcc-3.0']
^^ see below...
> Why is it still not included in Woody? Several kde and gnome packages
> depend on this packa
Hi,
I would like to have my public key signed by one of you. I live in Ulm,
Germany. Is someone in my area willing to meet me and sign my key?
Thanks in advance, Joerg
--
\ Joerg Wendland *joergland* --\
\ #21477980 \ [EMAIL PROTECTED
29 matches
Mail list logo
