Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal

Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jeremy Hankins writes ("Non-DD's in debian-legal"): >> I'm not sure I understand this part, though. Do you think that folks >> like myself, who are not DD's, should not participate in the discussions &g

Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal

with our ability to give advice on software freedom issues because people don't listen to us. That, ultimately, is why I posted my original message. -- Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal

@lists.debian.org > to become the gnome.alioth.debian.org in the example above. I'm afraid I don't understand the fear here. What would it mean for d-l to become gnome.alioth.debian.org in your example? -- Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03

Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal

; that context, it seems reasonable to point out that Walter is not in a > position to speak on behalf of Debian. That's entirely reasonable. Perhaps I misinterpreted aj's message somewhat. It seemed to me to be placing rather more emphasis on Walter not being a DD. -- Jeremy Han

Non-DD's in debian-legal

to hear it. (Note that I am not at all talking about the whole Sun java bit. I personally find it hard to get worked up about non-free software going into non-free. Perhaps legal counsel should have been sought, but that's not my call.) -- Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GPL and linking

s when you didn't have to. I'm gonna sue!" (Standing? What's that?) Conversely, if our idea of what constitutes a derived work is too narrow we could end up violating someone's copyright. -- Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10

Re: GPL and linking

*right* doesn't matter. We should only disagree with them if we have to for the sake of Debian -- in which case we're probably in trouble and should hire a lawyer ASAP. -- Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03 --

Re: Should this be filed as grave? Gcc-2.95

than that gcc-2.95 was somehow breaking g++/libstdc++ in testing. Just curious. -- Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03