[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> -Wl,-static ... -Wl,-dy are equivalent and shorter :-)
Not for me, even though the ld manual claims they're the same. I have no
idea why. But the reason I went looking for a more elaborate solution
was the above not working in the first place.
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I appreciate the clarification. What is desirable, then, is for the
> developer to be able to statically link his or her own libraries, and
> third party libraries, but to dynamically pick up "system" libraries,
> of which I would number libpthread. That would be adequate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> At the very least, this should be documented in update-rc.d(8).
Actually, now that I look again, it is pretty well documented. never
mind.
Jason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> It is possible to disable a service simply by removing links in
> /etc/rc*.d . So long as you leave at least one (/etc/rc0.d/K*package
> would seem to be a good candidate), update-rc.d when called by packages
> on upgrade is a no-op. Something like:
>
> rm /etc/rc*.d/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> What's wrong with adding an exit 0 to the init.d files?
dpkg will ask me whether I want to keep my changes each time I upgrade,
rather than just overwriting the script.
Jason
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I've thought for a while that perhaps update-rc.d should have a
> --persistant option that would do the same thing as "remove" AND add a
> K symlink in /etc/rc9.d/ -- a valid but unused runlevel -- so that
> users could permanently disable things in one swift commandline.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>Nonono, if you read Documentation/Changes for 2.4 it actually says that
>o Gnu C 2.91.66 # gcc --version
>
>Please note specifically this part of the same file
>"
>Note that gcc 2.7.2.3 is no longer a supported kernel compiler. The kernel
>
This has been bugging me for a while, but with linux 2.4.0 being
"official", I'm wondering about gcc versions. The recommended compiler
for the kernel is, AFAIK, egcs 1.1.2 (gcc 2.91.66?). There's a warning
in Documentation/Changes specifically for 2.95-derived compilers...the
only recent i386 gcc
8 matches
Mail list logo
