Hi Stefanos,
if you need help, I could lend a hand now and then. I don't have the
time to maintain the package on my own, but I have a faible for old
and/or undocumented C code and some experience in delving through
networking code in particular, so I could e.g. help hunting bugs.
Regards,
Jan
Hi,
I'd like to bring up that topic again[1][2][3], just in time for Lenny.
Although there's been some talk about this time and again, I am
still waiting for a final settlement...
Summary:
* Usage of virtual package 'editor' (taken from today's sid):
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# for DEP in Provides Depe
Hi Marc,
> Does it help when I try installing unstable, upgrading to new pam and
> then check whether login and ssh server still works? i canont do this
> before tomorrow night, and can only do very basic testing.
sure. On a side note, when you do so: pam upstream has introduced symbol
versioning
Hi Tomas,
> Rationale: I think screen is a shell in the best IT-sense of the word.
> So I ask you to please move it to a more specific section.
screen is not a shell in itself but more some kind of terminal emulator
like xterm IMHO - it provides an interface to an arbitrary number of
shells, just
severity 398752 wishlist
clone 398752 -1
reassign -1 debian-policy
retitle -1 (Re-)Add "editor" to virtual package list
block 398752 by -1
thankyou
(adding CC:d-policy, last time to CC:d-devel)
Hi Eddy,
> Well, some people provided some (good) counter examples, but they seem
> unreplied.
> Look
Hi Eddy,
(CCing d-devel, joining Christoph Haas' thread)
> The nvi package is an editor, but in spite of that it does not provide
> the virtual package "editor".
>
> Please add this Provides.
please see this discussion thread[1] back in 1996 about the virtual packages
list that is included in th
6 matches
Mail list logo
