Re: [Xcb] planning to remove xprint, libxprintutil and related packages

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 04:22:17PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21 2011, Drew Parsons wrote: > > cc: xcb maintainers: should you keep libxcb-xprint0 ? Do we need to talk > > about this? libxcb-xprint0 has no relation (in a packaging sense) to > > xprint. > > I see no harm providing it

Re: Re: APT 0.1.6 is released!

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I think you need to install the new nfs-server package. > > Yeah, I got bit by that too, and it took me a while to find that... > maybe we need some sort of "transitional-recommends" field? Something > that is ignored if you are installing the package (to avoid causin

Re: An X version of dselect for slink

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Since it seems obvious that apt WON'T be finished (GUI bit I mean) > before freeze of slink, I have started writing an X clone of the Dselect > tool. > > Although to be ready by 16th will make it pretty much a hack, I think it > is one worthy for this release (in much th

Re: intent to package tochnog

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > License: GPL That's good. > The author calls the executable 'tn' . I should probably change > this to 'tochnog' or 'tng' or something. Do you suppose the correct way to do this would be to place the real binary in a directory outside of the standard bi