On 31 January 2013 21:24, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
>> but on ubu^H^H^Hdebian, rlwrap uses the vanilla readline and it's
>> really annoying that i can't get the same line editing features with
>> rlwrap (and, i expect, readline).
> I can confirm that. I suspect libreadline differs from bash’s read
hi dd,
i really like the readline in bash - it seems bash is "vi complete" in vi mode.
now, i haven't looked closely, but i think the good vi mode is a patch
on (bash?) readline in debian?
in centos, i can't "df;" and delete up to next semicolon.
but on ubu^H^H^Hdebian, rlwrap uses the vanilla r
2 matches
Mail list logo
