Am 30.03.2024 um 08:56 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum :
> Yes. In that specific case, the original xz maintainer (Lasse Collin)
> was socially-pressed by a likely fake person (Jigar Kumar) to do the
> "right thing" and hand over maintenance.
> https://www.mail-archive.com/xz-devel@tukaani.org/msg00566.htm
Am 10.09.2019 um 07:50 schrieb Florian Lohoff :
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 03:31:37PM +0200, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>> I for one, do trust my ISPs a lot more than I trust Cloudflare or
>> Google, simply based on the jurisdiction.
> There are tons of setups which are fine tuned for latency because they
>
Am 17.04.2018 um 19:15 schrieb Thorsten Glaser :
>> Yes, of course. But Andreas hit a nerve with this on me. This project
>> has cost me lots of blood, tears and sweat and if someone is asking
>> for it to be completely thrown out out of nothing, I'm getting a bit
>> stressed out.
> I completely a
On 28.03.2018 08:38, Andreas Tille wrote:
I conclude that the Debian project is running no real m68k hardware any
more (please correct me if I'm wrong) and we are possibly doing a
service for some users who potentially also run qemu (wild guess of
mine). I'm wondering when it might be time to f
Am 21.11.2015 um 13:50 schrieb Pirate Praveen :
> On 2015, നവംബർ 21 5:20:27 PM IST, "Ingo Jürgensmann"
> wrote:
> >Maybe someone can setup a service or tool that logs into your old XMPP
> >contact and either forwards incoming messages from your old XMPP
> >a
Am 21.11.2015 um 12:31 schrieb Stefano Zacchiroli :
> - Do we offer any reasonable guarantee about the long term availability
> of the XMPP service, e.g., for people that stop being Debian Project
> Members?
>
> I guess the answer here is "no", and it's a reasonable one. But we
> should be cl
Am 03.12.2013 um 13:40 schrieb Thorsten Glaser :
> I’d love to have a bit more incentive to get people like Ingo, who
> has been doing m68k buildd work for, I believe, a decade, to become
Hmmm, since March 2001, if my archive serves me correctly.
> at least a Debian member. On the other hand, w
On Sun, 1 May 2011 01:36:38 +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
Sometimes we have a few packages we don't want to build on a certain
buildds. Sometimes this is because this package needs lots of ram. Or
it takes quite long and would waste the parallel building a machine
supports. Or whatever else. Of co
Crossposting from my blog[0]:
For over 6 years now I've been running Buildd.Net[1] as a service for
additional information about Debian autobuilder network[2]. The reason for
running Buildd.Net was simple: until then there was a web interface running on
kullervo.debian.org, but generating the
Hi!
Drupal, both version 5 and version 6, is a popular CMS and is in the Debian
archive. Upstream regularly releases security updates, which is a good
thing.
Unfortunately Debians packaging is lagging behind. No, I don't want to blame
the maintainer, who is doing a good job anyway. The problem is
10 matches
Mail list logo
