hard to tell what's wrong with it without look at
sources. It could be gcc bug. AFAIK 2.95.xx versions had quite buggy
support for templates. It seems that you will have to use
'preprocessor switch' for compatiblity with old gcc.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
piles your example code with 'template' removed. Did you tried to
compile your application with g++-2 with 'template' removed where it
should be removed? If it will not compile and link I will be
surprised.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
on. So you
should not use 'template' keyword. Just remove it.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Ilya Martynov (http://martynov.org/)|
| GnuPG 1024D/323BDEE6 D7F7 561E 4C1D 8A15 8E80 E4AE BE1A 53EB 323B
east it is so
for 4.3-STABLE.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Ilya Martynov (http://martynov.org/)|
| GnuPG 1024D/323BDEE6 D7F7 561E 4C1D 8A15 8E80 E4AE BE1A 53EB 323B DEE6 |
| AGAVA Software Company (http://www.agava.com/) |
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
odules so they should be
compiled anyway in stock kernel.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
| Ilya Martynov (http://martynov.org/)|
| GnuPG 1024D/323BDEE6 D7F7 561E 4C1D 8A15 8E80 E4AE BE1A 53EB 323B DEE6 |
| AGAVA Software Company (http://www.agava.com/) |
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
sly
affected by MTTR option. This fact is mentioned in its docs and I've
seen myself *significant* difference in its perfomance when I've
compiled kernel with MTTR option. Probably perfomance of simular
programs will be affected too.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
6 matches
Mail list logo
