Bug#1069829: ITP: python-samsung-mdc -- Samsung Multiple Display Control

2024-04-25 Thread Hugh McMaster
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hugh McMaster X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: python-samsung-mdc Version : 1.12.1 Upstream Contact: Victor Gavro * URL : https://pypi.org/project/python-samsung-mdc * License : BSD-3-Clause

Bug#1053697: ITP: rsgain -- ReplayGain 2.0 loudness normalizer

2023-10-08 Thread Hugh McMaster
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hugh McMaster X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: rsgain Version : 3.4 Upstream Contact: complexlogic * URL : https://github.com/complexlogic/rsgain * License : BSD-2-Clause, BSD-3-Clause

Bug#1051779: ITP: docopt-ng -- command-line arguments parser (python3)

2023-09-12 Thread Hugh McMaster
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Hugh McMaster X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org * Package name: docopt-ng Version : 0.9.0 Upstream Contact: Nick Crews * URL : https://jazzband.co/projects/docopt-ng * License : MIT Programming Lang: Python

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-17 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Branden, On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 10:08, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > Hi Hugh, > > [...] > So whether the man page is hand-crafted or generated from some other > format at build time is not relevant. In fact, it's _meta_ irrelevant > (if that's even a thing) because the only reason (apart from

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-17 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 09:10, Colin Watson wrote: > > Your problem is that you need this line as the very first line of the > page to instruct man(1) to run the tbl preprocessor: > > '\" t > > See https://manpages.debian.org/bookworm/man-db/man.1.en.html#DEFAULTS That does the trick. Thank you!

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Thu, 17 Aug 2023 at 03:39, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 09:29:45PM +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > > This all seems promising. Unfortunately, the man page is hand-crafted, > > not generated from another source, so groff is never invoked, and no >

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Branden, On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 at 00:30, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > > Hi Hugh, > > I work on groff upstream. Perfect :-) > At 2023-08-15T22:46:30+1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > > groff-message an.tmac::66: warning: tbl preprocessor > > failed, or it or soelim was n

Re: groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Colin, On Tue, 15 Aug 2023 at 23:55, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 10:46:30PM +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > > Lintian has recently started emitting this groff warning for ftlint.1 > > in freetype-demos as part of its man pages check: > > > > grof

groff warning: TE macro called with TW register undefined

2023-08-15 Thread Hugh McMaster
Lintian has recently started emitting this groff warning for ftlint.1 in freetype-demos as part of its man pages check: groff-message an.tmac::66: warning: tbl preprocessor failed, or it or soelim was not run; table(s) likely not rendered (TE macro called with TW register undefined) It seems TW i

Re: Proposed MBF: Removal of libfreetype6-dev

2023-07-17 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Sven, On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 at 01:13, Sven Joachim wrote: > > On 2023-07-16 22:38 +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > > > I will be removing the transitional package libfreetype6-dev (from the > > source package freetype) later this year. > > > > [snip] > > My

Re: Proposed MBF: Removal of libfreetype6-dev

2023-07-17 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Simon, On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 at 00:07, Simon McVittie wrote: > > On Sun, 16 Jul 2023 at 22:38:20 +1000, Hugh McMaster wrote: > > Currently, there are 219 build-dependencies and 29 (direct) > > dependencies on libfreetype6-dev, which has been released with > > bullseye a

Proposed MBF: Removal of libfreetype6-dev

2023-07-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi, I will be removing the transitional package libfreetype6-dev (from the source package freetype) later this year. Currently, there are 219 build-dependencies and 29 (direct) dependencies on libfreetype6-dev, which has been released with bullseye and bookworm. I plan to file bugs with severity

Re: Testing migrations not updating or visible

2020-07-01 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 04:02, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 30-06-2020 17:01, Scott Talbert wrote: > > Looks like the problem is not with the PTS but with britney, which seems > > to not have run in a couple of days: > > https://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html > > From #debian-release on IR

Testing migrations not updating or visible

2020-06-30 Thread Hugh McMaster
The package tracker is no longer displaying migration status or ‘excuses’ for packages. I expected xmlstarlet to have almost migrated, but it’s stuck on 3 days old. Other packages are not displaying any migration status, despite being uploaded recently. Hugh

Re: Bits from the Release Team: buster freeze update

2019-04-16 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Jonathan, On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 7:38 am, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > At the time of writing 150 release-critical bugs affect buster. This is the > number which needs to reach zero before the release can take place. What’s the easiest way to get a list of these RC bugs? Hugh

Re: Mass bug filing for the removal of freetype-config and freetype.m4

2018-02-05 Thread Hugh McMaster
Hi Simon, On Friday, 2 February 2018 11:14 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Thu, 01 Feb 2018 at 11:07:42 +0000, Hugh McMaster wrote: >> Freetype-config has been considered deprecated for several years [1]. > > By us, or by upstream? Both. We considered freetype-config a deprecated l

Re: Mass bug filing for the removal of freetype-config and freetype.m4

2018-02-02 Thread Hugh McMaster
On Friday, 2 February 2018 12:15 PM, Paul Wise wrote: > Will you be asking upstream to remove it too? I hadn't considered that, but it might be a good idea. Why do you ask?

Mass bug filing for the removal of freetype-config and freetype.m4

2018-02-01 Thread Hugh McMaster
--- I realise removing freetype-config may not be popular. However, the long-term benefits will outweigh any short-term inconvenience. -- Hugh McMaster [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642354 [2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=871470 [3] https://bugs.