caudium package up for discussion removal or adoption

Hi all! I've maintained caudium for a while. I've now stopped using it, partly because I work with apache and I've decided to switch my private installations to apache also but also because upstream is not very active but not all dead (whats the definition of dead upstream?). So is there a

Re: Possible MBF wrt common, FHS-compliant, default document root for the various web servers

On Sat, 7 Nov 2009, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote: Caudium can and will adjust to any standard that the community agrees upon and it can handle different directories without problem. I really dont have that much input for how this should be done but leaving it as it is now is worse. Thanks for yo

Problem resolving bug http://bugs.debian.org/407494

etch if we dont solve this soon. Please advice. //Henrik Andreasson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]