Re: Bug#790103: new default build flag from dpkg: -Wdate-time

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 08:26:24PM +0100, Hakan Ardo wrote: > > That means avr-gcc will be upgraded to the atmel release 3.5.0 based on > gcc > > 4.9.2 soon. > > soon = ? > Within a week or three...

Re: Bug#790103: new default build flag from dpkg: -Wdate-time

Hi, the archlinux avr-gcc seams to be a standard unpatched gcc compiled for the avr target. I would prefere to base the main avr-gcc package on the atmel releases as those have historically been of higiher quality for avr usage. That means avr-gcc will be upgraded to the atmel release 3.5.0 based o

s390 buildd?

Hi, 15/12 I released gcc-avr version 1:4.2.2-1, but acording to: http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?pkg=gcc-avr the s390 buildd has not yet tried to build it. What might be the problem? Thanx. -- Håkan Ardö

Re: X 4 and app-defaults

s problem, and I would sure have been assisted by such an repport. Is anyone working on sending those repports? or shall I do it myslef? Thomas? Please CC any reply to me. -- Hakan Ardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://master.debian.org/~hakan pgpfRuNrSbRCp.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: gcc, binutils, libc, gdb for Amtel AVR microcontrollers

all targets of interest built from the same source? After a closer look at the gcc patch it seems that what it does is simply to add a avr target, which means that it should be possible to compile for the other targets even after it is applied. This has to be verified ofcourse. The patch is availible

Re: gcc, binutils, libc, gdb for Amtel AVR microcontrollers

s there is some overlap here? Check out the web site and let me > know how you feel. I'm interested in seeing the Embedded Debian project > support more targets. I'll have a look. Have you talk to the gcc and binutils maintianers about this? I've mailed them now (se the

Re: ITP: gcc, binutils, libc, gdb for Amtel AVR microcontrollers

oure own wait till the combination has been done upstream. > > I assume the libc is not part of glibc at all, so that most likely needs > to be its own package. Correct, it's a separate implementaton of the most basic libc functions. -- Hakan Ardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://master.debian.org/~hakan pgphC8gYKIjvl.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: ITP: gcc, binutils, libc, gdb for Amtel AVR microcontrollers

On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 05:07:29PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2000 at 11:04:15PM +0200, Hakan Ardo wrote: > > Hi, > > the entire gnu develoopnet environment is ported to the avr arcitecture and > > runs nicely under debian. Currently all that excists as debi

ITP: gcc, binutils, libc, gdb for Amtel AVR microcontrollers

avalible I'd be most interested. Preferable one that works with gdb... Please CC replays to me. -- Hakan Ardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://master.debian.org/~hakan pgpWVs1Vrwt4R.pgp Description: PGP signature

libc6 and libc5 compat solibs

oing worng? -- --- Name: Hakan Ardo E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.ub2.lu.se/~hakan/sig.html Public Key: Try "finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]" Fingerprint: E9 81 FD 90 53 5C E9 3E 3D ED 57 15 1B 7E 29 F3 Interests:

Shared libraries in packages. How?

Hi, I have recently made the package compface (can be found in unstabe) containg the shared library libcompface. Now I am trying to make a package xfaces that uses this library. But I can't get dpkg-shlibdeps working. This is what is says: # dpkg-shlibdeps xfaces dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: unknown

cpio

The file ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/unstable/binary-i386/admin/cpio_2.4.2-7.deb seems to be missing...