On Mon, Dec 2, 2024, 11:20 Simon Richter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 12/2/24 18:39, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
>
> > This is not correct. Whether any of /usr/bin,/usr/sbin,/bin or /sbin
> > share a partition or not has no relationship to whether a user can
> > invoke a command, or whether that path is searc
Weird. I'm getting this:
Err:1 http://dl.google.com/linux/talkplugin/deb stable/main amd64
google-talkplugin amd64 5.41.3.0-1
Hash Sum mismatch
But as far as I can see the file I get at that URL from my browser
does in fact match the md5sum and sha1 in the package description. As
far as I can t
Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Regardless. Having people install fresh machines with things like
> > Postgres 7.2 is just embarrassing.
>
> I am not embarrassed.
Well perhaps you should be. Whenever they ask for support those users will be
told the version their running is hopele
> > Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > It would be helpful if people wouldn't make sweeping generalizations
> > > all the time.
"All the time"? ...
--
greg
it
being included?
I've attached the original message including headers.
--- Begin Message ---
I demand that Greg Stark may or may not have written...
> Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I demand that Greg Stark may or may not have written...
> What does that mean?
I
Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If apt kept even a single old revision in its cache then rolling back could
> > be as simple as
> > apt-get install -t previous libc6
>
> That would be good. (Similarly for aptitude, of course.)
>
> One question occurs, however: should this also (tr
Darren Salt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I demand that Greg Stark may or may not have written...
What does that mean?
--
greg
Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Er no they are not all in the pool. The only packages in the pool are
> the current versions for stable/testing/unstable/experimental. There are
> also the few packages that haven't been completely compiled on all archs
> yet and so are still left in arc
Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:53:36AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > It would be helpful if Debian could even be installed on machines newer
> > than about 2 years old.
>
> It would be helpful if people wouldn't make sweeping generalizations all the
> time.
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 03:05:56PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> > What started the chain of events was that a fairly routine minor bug bit the
> > latest libc6 release. He's an experienced sysadmin though and wasn't the
>
"Julian Mehnle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> First, I think what Daniel Jacobowitz said is entirely true. Why didn't you
> start with "testing"?
Sure testing is less likely to trigger this.
But testing isn't infallible either. And it shouldn't be mean Debian shouldn't
have better error handli
I finally convinced a sysadmin friend of mine that Debian was the way and the
light. He started a new job and showed up on his first day to set up his
machine by installing Debian. In short, things went horribly wrong and he
started this new job by wasting two days picking up the pieces. He's now
g list. I poked around
/usr/share/doc/xserver-xfree86 and the xsf web pages and couldn't find any
mention of a separate mailing list. I imagine it's there and I'm just blind.
> On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 12:20:01AM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> > Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROT
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just answer the questions.
Well there seem to be a lot of them. And a lot of them don't seem to have
default answers. Or in some cases any reasonable answer given my setup.
> It doesn't insist on "managing" your XF86Config-4 file now, it just in
"Nikita V. Youshchenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is a script that finds different versions of installed binary packages
> with the same source package name.
>
> Running this script on some of my systems gave me lots of interesting
> information ...
Indeed it seems to be finding me lot
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [ Moving to -devel. ]
>
> Fabrizio Polacco wrote:
> > It's written everywhere: DON'T RUN MAN AS ROOT!
Having no idea where it moved from or what the context was I'll blithely wade
in with an opinion:
Just because the bug is documented doesn't mean it's n
Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, Jan 06, 2001 at 03:49:07PM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> > I've been meaning to bring this up for a while:
> > Why on earth was this change ever made?
>
> I can't speak for whoever made the chang
Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2001 at 01:31:42PM -0400, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> > Changes in version 1.9.2:
> >
> > Removed /usr/local/lib from the default /etc/ld.so.conf
> > for Debian (Bug#8181).
>
> oops, except that mod is *ancient*. way before
"Eray Ozkural (exa)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The preprocessor macro seems to be undefined. There are also other
> subtleties while using pthread lib, such as the __USE_UNIX_98 stuff,
> which I really don't know (I only use c++, and UNIX_98 sections don't
> seem to come along. Why is that?)
There are no packages that have shared X11 libraries built with debugging
symbols, are there? I wouldn't want to ask such a thing of the maintainer,
there are enough complexities in the X packages as it is, but nobody would
happen to have such an libX11.so for libc5 would they?
--
greg
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Obviously I've misunderstood the behaviour of Emacs here - I'd assumed
> that the internal form was the same regardless of whether one got
> there via byte-compiling or not. Apparently this isn't the case!
it certainly isn't. I have to question your results too, t
Bear Giles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My plan, back when I was exploring the idea of a US-only package
> and/or derived distribution, was to use shared libraries and create
> a special null Kerberos package which would return error codes, something
> very close to the Kerberos 'bones' packag
So the people who don't see crashes, which version of Netscape are you using?
Do you use java successfully in Netscape? Do you have plugger installed? Do
you have any other plugins installed? Which versions of libc are you using?
# dpkg -l \*netscape\* | grep ^hi
hi netscape-base-4 5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Apr 28, "Stephen J. Carpenter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >The MAIN process runs as root. This is because if it recieves a kill signal
> >it needs to clean up its pid file. Can't do that if it was not root (not
> >without the permissions on /v
Leon Breedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Regarding curl, I'll be packaging an SSL enabled version only, as it seems
> that policy doesnt cover a source package building for both US & non-US.
There are a couple packages which do this, mutt-i etc. I think they all make
some minor alteration lik
So it's not a bug and we're satisfied with the following situation?
Some programs from other linux systems or even hamm systems will randomly seg
fault.
If any libraries from other linux distributions or even hamm systems are
present on a potato machine when programs are compiled the result
They don't seem to be in the Incoming mirrors, are they somewhere else?
There's someone who posts periodically saying he has an automatically built
iso image and boot floppies somewhere but I can't find any of his posts in the
archives.
Thanks,
greg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTE
Adrian Bridgett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To this end we really need a short document which details the differences,
> the "right" way to do things and the definite "No-No"s. Maybe this should
> go into the packaging manual, but initially it is probably better to have it
> seperate as it wou
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Greg Stark writes:
> > We've got be be a little more careful with the Replaces header. I just
> > installed the libc6 version of comerr, and dpkg helpfully deinstalled
> > e2fsprogs.
>
> That's perfectly nor
29 matches
Mail list logo
