On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 04:23:35PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:04:14PM +0100, Qingning Huo wrote:
> > Because of recent changes in my Real Life, I cannot spend enough time on
> > libtorrent and rtorrent as I would like. Whoever want to adopt are
>
On Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 10:04:14PM +0100, Qingning Huo wrote:
> Because of recent changes in my Real Life, I cannot spend enough time on
> libtorrent and rtorrent as I would like. Whoever want to adopt are
> welcome to take over their maintenance. I would recommend them be
> adopted together, bec
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 01:52:58PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 11:45:00AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
> > I have to my annoyance noticed that several of the doc packages
> > (especially development packages) contains files that are gzipped. That
> > is either example
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 09:52:22AM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote:
> J?rg Sommer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Package name: xindy
> > Version : 2.2-beta2-1
> > Upstream Author : Joachim Schrod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL : http://xindy.sourceforge.net/
> > * License
On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 06:35:23PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 05:56:11PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Kurt Roeckx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > For now I suggest you contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > OK, thanks; I considered that, but wasn't sure it was focused enou
On Wed, Mar 22, 2006 at 09:33:35AM -0800, Hex Star wrote:
> boredom :P
Please don't spam next time your bored. Some of us have better things to
do.
--
gram
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:01:46AM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> One reason why few people are working on ARM is probably the lack of
> a cheap platform that can be used for development. Fortunately, this
> problem has now been addressed. Over the last few months, I worked
> (in collaboration
On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:05:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Enabling `-j' will probably expose concurrency problems in the build
> system for lots of packages.
>
> What about building different packages in parallel instead?
Isn't that what is done currently?
--
gram
--
To UNSUBSCRI
On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 12:58:25PM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le mercredi 28 d?cembre 2005 ? 23:49 -0600, Adam Heath a ?crit :
> > You'll only get mails if the sender sends to ###-submitter. Mail sent to
> > just
> > ### is not forwarded, and only stored.
> >
> > This is not a bug in the s
On Tue, Dec 20, 2005 at 08:57:08AM -0600, Steve Greenland wrote:
> No, I'm not against syntax highlighting, I use it in emacs. The problem
> is that the colors[1] are unreadable except on when the terminal
> background is black and there are no lights on in the room. I realize a
> lot of hackers wo
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 06:54:42PM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:38:57PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> > There are obviously users who will prefer nvi to vim (and others who
> > prefer some other vi), but I get the impression there are rather more who
> > prefer vim, it's
On Sun, Dec 18, 2005 at 01:45:58AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On Dec 17, Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > After installation you should have a tmpfs mounted on /run.
>
> I do not remember a consensus about this.
Changes in Debian are generally decided by package maintainers, not by
co
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 08:48:44AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> how about sending this to Frontdesk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> or MIA,
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> instead of spamming debian-devel with that?
Since when is a message that is on topic (or at least relevant) to
Debian development spam?
--
g
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 10:44:15AM -0800, Blars Blarson wrote:
> If you need to access the BTS data from a program, there is an LDAP
> interface available and a copy of entire BTS database on one of the
> developer accessable machines.
Wouldn't it also be possible to subscribe to debian-bugs-dist
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 08:37:46PM +0100, Jochen Voss wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 02:43:42PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> > This software is being provided to you, the LICENSEE, by Tony Robinson
> > and SoftSound under the following license. By obtaining, using and/or
&g
On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 09:31:38PM +0100, Jon Dowland wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2005 at 02:43:42PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> > * Package name: shorten
> > Version : 3.6.0
> > Upstream Author : Tony Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > * URL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: shorten
Version : 3.6.0
Upstream Author : Tony Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.example.org/
* License : non-free (see below)
Description
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 03:41:10PM +0200, Michel van der Klei wrote:
> * Package name: pptpproxy
> Version : 2.0
> Upstream Author : Emmanuel Mogenet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.mgix.com/pptpproxy
> * License : Public Domain
> Description : a s
On Thu, Aug 11, 2005 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> Now that no package depend on it, I am going to remove it, but that
> leaves a libxslt1.1 package alone, not really respectful of the debian
> standards for package naming.
How is it not respectful of Debian standards for package namin
On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 03:12:10PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> I think overall it serves the users more to default to running missed
> cronjobs on boot than not. If that causes you problems you can always
> purge anarcron or fcron or protect the jobs itself. There might eb
> cases where it
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 02:43:36PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:27:34PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > I think this has proven very helpful so I set up a only slightly
> > modified version for the current transition from 3.3 to 4.0.
> > You can find it at http:/
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:30:04AM +0100, James Troup wrote:
> A UPS upgrade is being performed this week in the machine room that
> houses sphor.debian.org (aka bugs.debian.org) hosted at the Oregon
> State University's Open Source Lab. Part of this upgrade will require
> 2 complete power outages
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 12:45:17PM +0200, Martin Mewes wrote:
> Pascal Hakim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> > You might want to obscure those a little bit. You should probably
> > munge the Return-Path from those emails, and possibly the top
> > Received: header.
>
> Munging works are in queue. The
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I haven't been able to take good care of the fetchmail package, and
therefore I'm orphaning it.
I'd like whoever adopts it to be able to spend a good amount of time
with the package. Upstream has been slow lately, and the adopter would
likely end up working with ups
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 01:24:06AM +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> * Package name: ms-sys
>
> [...]
>
> This is a Linux program for writing Microsoft compatible boot records. The
> program does the same as Microsoft "fdisk /mbr" to a hard disk or "sys d:"
> to a floppy or FAT partiti
On Sat, Dec 11, 2004 at 10:53:10PM +0100, Marcin Orlowski wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: unlzx
> Version : x.y.z
> Upstream Author : Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://ftp.uni-paderborn.de/aminetbin/find?unlzx
> * License
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 09:37:01PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:24:11 -0600, Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > The line is not as easy to draw as you might think.
>
> On the contrary, the line is not so arcane. Computer related stuff is
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 12:10:13AM +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
> If it is a program, it is software.
And so my Python code that includes docstrings is what? What are
PostScript files? The line is not as easy to draw as you might think.
--
gram
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:31:51PM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 06:49:21PM +, Brian M. Carlson wrote:
> > Two bugs will be filed on packages that meet criteria in both 1) and
> > 2). If the release managers would like, I will be happy to auto-tag
> > the bugs in 1) sarg
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:43:44AM +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 00:22 +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > 1) Current gnome-panel do *not* support XDG menus (only KDE does).
> > (Debian menu has XDG menu support through menu-xdg.)
>
> It's very much in the works, check out
On Wed, Oct 27, 2004 at 06:10:43PM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
> > I would like to know why sysklog package uses its own logrotation
> > scripts and not logrotate.
>
> Try to convert it to logrotate and soon you will understand why it still
> uses savelog.
It seems
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 05:35:57PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> * Nikita V. Youshchenko [Sun, Oct 24 2004, 03:53:23PM]:
> > Probably there are non-technical problems with the uncoming release. But
>
> There are, as described before. For example, I cannot see any life sign
> of our FTP masters. How
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 09:09:53PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Rob Browning wrote:
> > If I added a new sign/encrypt sub-key to my Debian key, would I be
> > able to use that to sign and upload packages? Would the Debian
>
> Yes, mostly. Some stuff (db.d.o an
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 10:07:00AM -0500, John Hasler wrote:
> "Today will not be a good day. You will receive many snarky responses to
> your message to debian-devel complaining about your missing horoscope.
> More bad news to follow in other messages".
Please, don't not make the spam problem wo
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 12:01:44PM +0200, Michal Politowski wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:46:02 -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> > Audio Tag Tool is a program to manage the information fields in MP3 and
> > Ogg Vorbis files (commonly called tags). Tag Tool can be used to edit
>
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:45:59PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 21:46:02 -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> > Audio Tag Tool is a program to manage the information fields in MP3 and
> > Ogg Vorbis files (commonly called tags). Tag Tool can be used to edit
> > tag
On Tue, Oct 19, 2004 at 02:45:24AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 10:45:59PM -0700, Joshua Kwan wrote:
> > Description: viewing, editing and writing ID3 tags of MP3 and Ogg files
> > EasyTAG is an utility for viewing, editing and writing
> > the ID3 tags of MP3 and Ogg file
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: tagtool
Version : 0.10
Upstream Author : Pedro Lopes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://pwp.netcabo.pt/paol/tagtool/
* License : GPL
Description : tool to tag and rename MP3 and Ogg Vorbis files
Audio Tag T
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 07:40:06PM -0800, D. Starner wrote:
> > I just installed the textedit.app package; it pulled in a few GNUstep
> > libraries, but not a complete desktop environment.
>
> Do the GNUstep libs still start a demon at startup? Last time I
> checked, they did, instead of starting
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 11:00:56AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When I said "without GNOME installed," I meant without the entire GNOME
> > desktop environment installed: nautilus, gnome-session, metacity, etc.
>
&
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 07:44:12PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 05:27:59PM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
> >> I don't mind what it's called as long as I can see by its name that it
> >>
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:03:00PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 06:44:58PM -0800, Nunya Who wrote:
Oh, its our good friend Tom Ballard. Maybe you could get back to working
on Debian and stop trolling now?
--
gram
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 06:44:58PM -0800, Nunya Who wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 12:59:38PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > He did not say that all Christians are religious fanatics.
> >
> > Godwin.
>
> Copout.
Yes, it is too bad he is copping (sp) out on discussing all sorts of
things immed
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:15:59PM +0530, Ganesan Rajagopal wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: yahoo2mbox
> Version : 0.15
> Upstream Author : Vadim Zeitlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * URL : http://www.lpthe.jussieu.fr/~zeitlin/yahoo2mbox.html
>
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:19:58PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 10:03, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > What would be unacceptable about it, and why is it only a "borderline"
> > > case? What would push it over the borderline?
> >
> > Demons are evil, and the BSD m
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:03:57AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> >> it's a bit different and for different arches. What about the arches
> >> `a
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:12:57AM -0600, Chad Walstrom wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:52:50PM +0100, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote:
> > I'm wondering if there's some IMAP (read-only) access to the lists? It
> > recently occured to me that that would be a Nice Feature(tm), or do I
> > have a flaw in t
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:05:44AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> I recently adopted autotrace, and had a package with an updated
> control file uploaded; it has now been in the archive for several
> days.
I am in the same situation with hostname.
> Nevertheless, the BTS persists in giving the Q
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 08:44:42PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Graham Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If this would lead to more developers and beta-testers being able to
> > use experimental, then I think this would be a good idea. People might
> > upload ther
On Mon, Dec 15, 2003 at 02:10:22PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I think that's the way it should be. Experimental isn't a complete
> > distribution in the sense that the others are, so it doesn't really
> > deserve a codename.
>
> Isn't it possible th
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:50:43PM +0100, Magosányi Árpád wrote:
> I hope that at least some of you were listening. (First I thought
> there would be some feedback, at least like "stop it, this is
> boring!", or "why do you write to a mailing list which does not even
> exists?".)
What was your int
On Sun, Dec 14, 2003 at 11:11:20AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> Unfortunately, my experience with the topic tends to indicate that the
> same folks who care are very likely to consider there mere *concept* of
> a 'daemon' to be anathema, evil, foul, unclean, and all sorts of other
> descriptives.
Cf
On Sat, Dec 13, 2003 at 10:41:22PM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Everybody seems to agree that new stable versions *should* be out
> about every 6 months.
I don't think that is true. I think developers (and users) have a wide
range of opinions as to how often there should be a new Debian release
On Fri, Dec 05, 2003 at 01:44:40PM +0100, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Le vendredi 05 décembre 2003 à 12:38:10, Amaya a écrit:
> > I was out to the movies with him yesterday, he is not MIA or anything.
> > We even talked about plucker's state. He is in the proccess of fixing
> > the bugs.
>
> [...]
>
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:20:14AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Please, please, use debian- or some other prefix! That shouldn't confuse
> any rational person
What about sys- as a prefix?
--
gram
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:26:59PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 20:49, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> > Okay, if I'm counting correctly, gnome-mag and xml-resume-library have
> > not been taken yet. Is anyone interested in these packages? Note
> > that gnome-mag has a RC outstan
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:42:20AM -0800, Tom wrote:
> Let me tell you a story about a job I had one time: I worked for a guy
> (in his basement -- don't ask) who bought your personal credit card data
> and other publicly available information. He would pay about $10,000 or
> $15,000 for lists
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 02:57:11AM +0100, Bernd Eckenfels wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:54:24AM +1000, Andrew Pollock wrote:
> > The only way to have avoided this kernel vulnerability from day-0 of
> > discovery/fix release would have been to be constantly upgrading to
> > pre-release kernels
On Tue, Nov 18, 2003 at 08:58:17AM -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> It would be really nice to have 7.4 in sarge.. Personally I think
> there should probably be enough time given the lack of messages on
> d-d-a regarding freezes and the like. 7.4 adds alot of nice things
> and speeds up a number of
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 12:02:07AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >We are pleased to announce the first beta release of debian-installer, the
> >new installation system for sarge.
>
> We want screenshots!
Seconded!
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 09:37:16PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 10:45:32AM +, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 07:55:03PM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > >
> > > > What not rename linux-kernel-headers to simple system-headers-linux?
> > > > This will
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 11:56:37AM -0500, Greg Stark wrote:
> Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 01:53:36AM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote:
> > > It would be helpful if Debian could even be installed on machines newer
> > > than about 2 years old.
> >
> > It would be he
On Wed, Nov 05, 2003 at 02:49:39AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > [...]
> [...]
Please, guys, don't have your discussion here. I don't think we really
care about the differences between PaX and exec-shield. Debian is not,
and, to the best of my knowledg
On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 03:22:11PM +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> It is noteworthy that the split build-arch/build-all seems to be next
> to useless, as dpkg-buildpackage invokes build (because the former two
> a optional) and "the build target should depend on those of the
> targets build-arch an
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 12:22:33PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> James is ftp-master, DAM, autobuilder admin, and part of the
> debian-admin team as well.
Wow!
--
gram
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 08:49:25PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 18:06, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > > > It's::not::like::this::sort::of::jargon::is::difficult::to::understand,::or
> > > > ::that::writing::package::descriptions::which::rely::entirely::on::one's
> > > > ::understandi
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 05:10:18PM +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 07:12:03PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > You can either use a vanilla kernel, or unapply the IPSEC patch as
> > documented in the README.Debian file.
>
> Why is the ipsec patch applied by default in th
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 02:24:37PM -0400, John Belmonte wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >Generally, I think people are using
> >http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ and looking through the bugs
> >with ids lower than x. I think you'll find that the majority of older
> >bugs there fall into th
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 09:50:41AM +0200, Santiago Vila wrote:
> Does anyone have a good estimation about the number of packages which
> currently do this? (That is, assume *blindly* that /usr/doc exists).
I have 687 packages on my system and 35 of them have symlinks in
/usr/doc. If the number on
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 06:18:58PM -0500, Steve Greenland wrote:
> Aptitude is nice power tool for dealing with 6000+ packages (or
> whatever it is now)
try twice that:
$ apt-cache search .\* | wc -l
12204
--
gram, who wonders if this could be getting out of hand
signature.asc
Description: Di
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 08:28:16PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Monday 29 September 2003 19:32, Graham Wilson wrote:
> > Changes:
> > mini-dinstall (0.6.8) unstable; urgency=low
> [...]
> >* Change DTD in manpage and manual to locally installed version.
>
> W
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:33:45PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Op wo 24-09-2003, om 17:05 schreef Gunnar Wolf:
> > And I insist... Do you want to stop every mail which is (peeking at my
> > inbox) between 1887 and 2183 bytes long just because it might be a
> > virus?
>
> Hm. I was under the i
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 11:18:27PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> While /var/log/mail.log is rotated nicely on my (woody) boxes,
> I have no idea which package is responsible for that.
> Any suggestions ?
logrotate.
--
gram
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:09:30PM -0500, david nicol wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-09-10 at 04:02, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > sorry, a system that only works sometimes (or even most of the time)
> > is a broken system.
> >
> > i prefer to know that my system's behaviour will be consistent and
> > correct.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:53:16PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > helps catching 95%... But the bandwidth is still used... I'm still
> > looking for a pure MTA solution...
>
> A pure MTA solution would still need to scan the body and thus would still
> eat your bandwid
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:07:40PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> This strikes me as a good idea, unless someone has a legit reason to
> include an empty documentations file in a package. So speak up if you
> do. Maybe a zero length TODO could be considered to have some implied
> meaning,
in my mind, i
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:49:46AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:33:22AM -0400, Work Needing Prospective
> Packages wrote:
> >py-xmlrpc (#161224), orphaned 296 days ago
> > Description: Implementation of the XML-RPC protocol for Python
>
> Let me guess.
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:49:46AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:33:22AM -0400, Work Needing Prospective
> Packages wrote:
> >judy (#172772), orphaned 210 days ago
> > Description: C library for creating and accessing dynamic arrays
> > Reverse Depe
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:49:46AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:33:22AM -0400, Work Needing Prospective
> Packages wrote:
> >gnome-objc (#165642), orphaned 263 days ago
> > Description: objective-c bindings for gtk/gnome (obs.)
> > Reverse Depends:
im wondering if anyone can help me with bug #196563. the bug says that
xmllint is segfaulting on m68k. the reporter can reproduce the segfault.
i asked him for a backtrace, but gdb segfaulted. he was able to provide
strace output however. it seems that the bug manifests before the
program's main()
On Sun, Jun 29, 2003 at 03:50:29PM -0500, Kenneth Pronovici wrote:
> The upstream maintainer of XMLTV, which I package for Debian, has
> temporarily forked the Perl Date::Manip module. He says:
>
>Over the past six months or so I've accumulated various bug fixes to
>the Date::Manip module
On Mon, May 26, 2003 at 08:42:52AM +0300, Tommi Virtanen wrote:
> On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 08:49:06PM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> > * Package name: yavipin
>
> How does it differ from OpenVPN?
nothing, apparently. i will play with both in the next couple of days
and
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-05-24
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: yavipin
Version : 0.9.6
Upstream Author : Jerome Etienne
* URL : http://yavipin.sf.net/
* License : GPL [1]
Description : daemon for creating secure tunnels
Yavipi
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 11:16:21AM -0500, Graham Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
> > On Friday 23 May 2003 03:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > > Morgon Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > None taken. And no, I
On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 04:28:59PM +0200, Goulais, Raphael wrote:
> On Friday 23 May 2003 03:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Morgon Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > None taken. And no, I am not.
> > [a DD]
> >
> > OK, then, I'm going ahead and taking fltk1.1.
>
> Does this mean that debian po
On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:51:05AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > At http://www.freebsd.org/donations/wantlist.html, the FreeBSD
> > developers have a list of computer-related stuff they could use to
> > improve their work on the FreeBSD operating system. I think this is
On Thu, May 15, 2003 at 06:15:07PM +0900, TSUCHIYA Masatoshi wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
>
> * Package name: latex209
> Version : 25.mar.1992
> Upstream Author : Leslie Lamport
> * URL or Web page :
> ftp://ctan.tug.org/tex-archive/obsolete/macros/latex209/distribs
On Wed, May 14, 2003 at 03:55:44AM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> * Fielder George Dowding <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-05-13 09:34]:
> > I note that Yasuhiro Take ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is not listed in your
> > missive.
>
> Yes, because the criteria outlined in the first paragraph of James'
> messag
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 12:11:16PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> Here is a list of packages in unstable maintained by people on James's
> lists. May not be complete, but I grepped for names and for emails
> seperately so probably found most of them.
[...]
> No reply:
[...]
> Tor Slettnes
> mindi
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 11:04:00PM +0100, tomas pospisek wrote:
> On 8 Dec 2002, No?l K?the wrote:
> > I started to make the changelog and copyright file of the Debian
> > packages online
>
> Ah! Wondeful. Would be nice to have it integrated in the frontends ...
> "do I want/need to update this to
reassign 171720 evolution
thanks
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 04:20:15PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Package: general
this should be filed against the evolution package.
--
gram
On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 02:46:01PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> I have decided that since my mailing lists are not currently hosted on
> Debian, I don't have the time/resources/testing platform that I used
> to for maintaining Ecartis, and I would like some qualified person to
> take over maintenan
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 05:16:20PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 09:00, Christophe Barb?? wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Version: unavailable; reported 2002-12-01
> > Severity: normal
> >
> > I request an adopter for the xmlto package.
>
> Between stuff like this, and our lack
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 08:29:28PM -0800, Carl B. Constantine wrote:
> If not, I might take it up since I think asd-ng (which I'm supposed to
> be maintaining) is in limbo at present.
what is asd-ng?
--
gram
pgpPEqEM5v6xH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 01:52:01PM +1100, Andrew Lau wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:36:02AM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> > gnome 1 probably is not going to be in sarge, so the difference
> > between gnome 1 and gnome 2 arent going to matter to someone
> > installing
On Thu, Nov 28, 2002 at 10:22:01PM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 21:09, Andrew Lau wrote:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Version: N/A; reported 2002-11-29
> > Severity: wishlist
> >
> > * Package name: tsclient
> > Version : 0.56
> > Upstream Author : Erick Woods <[EMA
On Sun, Nov 24, 2002 at 10:51:14AM -0500, christophe barbe wrote:
> So if someone is interested and feels he can do a better job, I would be
> happy.
i would be interested in packaging it, but seeing as im not a developer
yet, i would need a sponsor (though i can ask david and see if he might
be w
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 12:07:22AM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Carlos Laviola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > -newmaint-discuss is probably better.
>
> Dead list according to lists.debian.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is not though, and there has been some discussion
there in the past.
--
gram
pgpW8
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 01:36:07PM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 02:19:50AM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> > And/or, has katie advanced to the point where mere mortals can actually get
> > it installed and working without taking a 3D6 SAN loss?
> >
> > For all of it's limitati
99 matches
Mail list logo
