ter receiving
> a patch.
Doesn't "wontfix" mean that you acknowledge the bug, but decided not to
fix it?
If this is indeed a QEMU problem, IMHO you should not acknowledge the bug.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There'
r{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "pro
ng
Extension" (for FreeScale parts) and "Synergistic Processing Element" (for Cell
parts), both in a PowerPC context.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In perso
gt; there would be a way to support this feature...
Enabling `-j' will probably expose concurrency problems in the build system for
lots of packages.
What about building different packages in parallel instead?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert
update-menus, where they all
kept running in the background when I did `apt-get upgrade -u'. All those
update-menus processes consumed CPU cycles and tried to exhaust memory (I
`only' have 128 MB in my PPC box).
Greetings,
Geert
5 matches
Mail list logo