against
it.
On Sat, 2008-08-16 at 22:46 -0300, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:51:08PM +0200, FRANCISCO MOYA FERNANDEZ wrote:
> > I already know that people do also build their own packages, thanks. You do
> > not need to "rewire" the debian/rules
ported on the Debian Policy.
Regards,
F. Moya
-Original Message-
From: Wouter Verhelst [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 15/08/2008 16:53
To: FRANCISCO MOYA FERNANDEZ
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Some autobuilders wait for build-indep dependencies
On Mon, Aug 11,
uires both Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep, but
what else can I do if build-arch and build-indep targets are still
optional?
I think having both Build-Depends and Build-Depends-Indep is a good
heuristic for the autobuilders to try just build-arch instead of build.
Regards,
Paco
--
Fran
-arch in a chrooted environment in an x86 box
works as expected. I made my x86 build log for binary-arch target available at
http://arco.esi.uclm.es/~francisco.moya/debian/zeroc-ice_3.3.0-4_i386.build
Is this a buildd/sbuild/wanna-peruse bug?
Thanks
Francisco Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dear all,
I'm the current maintainer of ZeroC Ice packages. Ice is a GPL'd
CORBA-like middleware for distributed heterogeneous computing.
Recently the upstream developers reunified all of the source packages
into a single big tarball. Some of the packages (the Java5 packages)
work well under ic
hould #369605 be merged into #360482?Should #369605 be closed using an email?Thanks for your help,Paco-- Francisco Moya Fernandez Computer Architecture and Networks GroupAssistant Professor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] School of Computer ScienceFax:(+34 926) 29 53 54Unive
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francisco Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: zeroc-ice
Version : 3.0.0
Upstream Author : ZeroC, Inc.
* URL : http://www.zeroc.com/
* License : GPL
Description : ZeroC Internet Communications Engine
Ic
7 matches
Mail list logo
