Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Paolo Lovergine
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-...@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libgeo-libproj-ffi-perl
Version : 1.00
Upstream Contact: Arne Johannessen
* URL :
* License : Perl or
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Paolo Lovergine
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: libmozilla-ca-perl
Version : 20230821-1
Upstream Contact: Gisle Aas
* URL : https://github.com/libwww-perl/Mozilla-CA
* License : MPL
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Paolo Lovergine
* Package name: pktools
Version : 2.4.3
Upstream Author : Pieter Kempeneers
* URL : http://www.nongnu.org/pktools/html/index.html
* License : GPL3
Programming Lang: C++
Description : A
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian GIS Project
* Package name: ossim
Version : 1.7.21
Upstream Author : Garrett Potts et al.
* URL : http://www.ossim.org/OSSIM/OSSIM_Home.html
* License : LGPL
Programming Lang: C++
Description : The OSSIM li
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian GIS Project
* Package name: python-liblas
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Howard Butler
* URL : http://pypi.python.org/pypi/libLAS
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: Python
Description : A Python module t
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Paolo Lovergine
* Package name: libkml
Version : 1.0.1
Upstream Author : Google Inc.
* URL : http://code.google.com/p/libkml/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++, Python and Java
Description : The C
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian GIS Project
* Package name: ncview
Version : 1.93g
Upstream Author : David W. Pierce
* URL : http://meteora.ucsd.edu/~pierce/ncview_home_page.html
* License : GPL
Programming Lang: C
Description : A X11 vi
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian GIS Project
* Package name: liblas
Version : 1.2.1
Upstream Author : Howard Butler et al
* URL : http://liblas.org/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description : ASPRS LiDAR data translation toolset
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian GIS Project
* Package name: spatialindex
Version : 1.3.2
Upstream Author : Marios Hadjieleftheriou
* URL : http://trac.gispython.org/spatialindex
* License : LGPL 2.1+
Programming Lang: C++
Description : A
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Paolo Lovergine
* Package name: dans-gdal-scripts
Version : 0.14
Upstream Author : Dan Stahlke
* URL : http://www.gina.alaska.edu/projects/gina-tools
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: tk-tile
Version : 0.7.8
Upstream Author : Joe English and other parties.
* URL : http://tktable.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Debian GIS Project
* Package name: geotiff
Version : 1.2.3
Upstream Author : Frank Warmerdam et al. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://geotiff.maptools.org/
* License : MIT/X like
Programming Lang: C
Description :
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: ogdi
Version : 3.1.5
Upstream Author : Frank Warmerdam et al
* URL : http://ogdi.sourceforge.net/
* License : BSD-like
Programming Lang: C
Descr
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 08:17:28AM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote:
> If absolute trust is the only thing you will accept, then you might as
> well withdraw from Debian project, and go hide in a hole with some
> paranoiod survivalists in Montana. We can't have absolute trust; it
> is impossible. And yo
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 04:52:04AM -1200, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> no manpages are not going to be renamed. but should be split of
> from manpages if they are linux specific to a package called linux-manpages.
>
> check the package that's in new queue now how it's done:
> http://io.debian.net/~tar/d
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 04:52:04AM -1200, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
> >Wouldn't this package conflict with the 'manpages' package (which provides
> >them for GNU/Linux) and with the manpages provided by other (core)
> >packages?
> >Or are all manpages going to be renamed so that there is no filename
>
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: autodir
Version : 0.99.0
Upstream Author : Venkata Ramana Enaganti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* URL : http://www.intraperson.com/autodir/
* License : Crea
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 09:09:48AM +, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 10:01:03AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:42:25AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> > > I seek co-maintainers for:
> > >
> > >
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 01:42:25AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> I seek co-maintainers for:
>
> mwavem
> thinkpad, tpctl
> resolvconf
>
I got a couple of thinkpads, so i could be a good candidate for
thinkpad related things if you agree.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:54:11AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> Hm, doesn't just manually loading mousedev (and putting it in
> /etc/modules) get things working again?
>
Mousedev, evdev and usbmouse here, to have a working setup for X with
a synaptics touchpad and an usb mouse.
--
Francesco
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: netgo
Version : 0.5
Upstream Author : Per Johansson
* URL : http://netgo.hjolug.org/
* License : GPL
Description : KDE tool to interactively
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 08:57:27AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> OoO En cette matinée pluvieuse du lundi 25 juillet 2005, vers 10:42,
> "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
>
> > I pointed both bugs at the very start of july (or end of june?)
> > to both stable and testing sect
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 12:08:00PM +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 10:17:24AM +0200, Benjamin Mesing wrote:
> > my congratulation to the team too. However I was not as fortunate as the
> > Sean.
> >
>
> Me too, at least on this machine I had to explicitly install
>
On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 05:05:09PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> Then we would have
>
> Debian 4.0 for etch, 4.1 for etch stable release 1, 4.2 for etch stable
> release 2, 4.2a for etch stable release 2 with a minor CD mastering fix
> (for example), etc.pp.
>
> Does the release team agree wit
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 03:08:48PM -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> Since not everyone subscribes to d-d, is there a n easy way to do this?
> Would a change in a library that is officially depended on by more than
> X packages qualify to be sent out via d-d-a? Or does there is exist
> some alias
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 10:03:35PM +0300, Sami Haahtinen wrote:
> Personally i feel that Debian Developers should put their jealousy
> aside, burry the hatchet and start collaborating with the other
> developers out there, not just ubuntu. Besides, you have given your work
> out to the public for a
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 12:19:11PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > I'd expect maintainers drop patches which are orphaned by the upstream
> > or whose maintainance would be a problem...
>
> The number of patches that do not apply shown in the initial message of
> this thread shows that your expect
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:35:59AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
>
> > The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches
> > and per-arch patches).
> > I'm asking
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 12:40:26AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:04:02AM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > The check shown below is almost complete (but for a couple of 2.2 patches
> > and per-arch patches).
> > I'm asking if
arded message from Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Status of kernel-patches in sarge
Mail-Followup-To: debian-kernel@lists.debian
On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 08:55:28PM +, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> Francesco Paolo Lovergine debian.org> writes:
> > Package: wnpp
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Owner: "Francesco P. Lovergine" debian.org>
> >
> &g
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: "Francesco P. Lovergine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Package name: gstat
Version : 2.4.4
Upstream Author : Edzer J. Pebesma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> et al.
* URL : http://www.gstat.org/
* License : GPL
Description : A program f
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:24:53PM +1000, Pascal Hakim wrote:
> > I think a suitable section in debian policy would be appropriate. And
> > mere technical discussions about the policy contents are also
> > appropriate in d-policy. All other technical discussions should go
> > in an alioth list. My
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 11:56:47AM +0200, Alexis Sukrieh wrote:
> Pascal Hakim wrote:
> >Speaking as a listmaster, I believe that a list that would be used to
> >provide people with a place to discuss the packaging of web-apps, as
> >well as standard things associated with it is a great idea. It's
On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 07:28:48PM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> I've lurked for a while in [EMAIL PROTECTED] hoping that that would
> be the right place for such discussions, and, when they happen, the
> subscribers are usually pretty clued-in and interested. Perhaps it is
> the natural place to
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 04:10:21PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Ideally, we would have agreement to update all of the following packages to
> libmysqlclient12 at the same time:
>
> courier
> cyrus-sasl2
> exim4
> linesrv
> pam-mysql
> postfix
> proftpd
^^^
yet do
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 06:17:33PM +0100, Tony Houghton wrote:
> I was thinking of something like /usr/share/rox-desktop/Apps (I would
> probably make a meta-package called rox-desktop anyway, to conveniently
> install a nice bundle of applications), but that would mean having to
> move the binarie
On Mon, Feb 14, 2005 at 10:47:24PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Justin Pryzby writes:
> > It occurs to me that help output to stderr is arguably appropriate if an
> > invalid option is given
>
> But '--help' is not an invalid option.
>
It depends on programs, sometimes the same usage function is u
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 03:01:26PM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:25:15PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
>
> > However, now we've suddenly discovered that _other_ programs get confused by
> > this! In particular, if you use an NFSv4-patched mount, it does a
> > gethostna
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 12:07:06PM +1100, Paul Hampson wrote:
> > So what if we had two editions of libmysqlclient, one of them
> > ssl-enabled and the other - as currently - not? That would allow
> > using ssl whenever possible. I think that could be done, without
> > breaking things.
>
> That's
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:17:44AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:53:34AM +0100, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> > > > Nice, so we should check that any linked GPL library directly
> > > > (obviuolsy) or
> > > > indirectly
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 12:39:58AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > Nice, so we should check that any linked GPL library directly (obviuolsy) or
> > indirectly (with N=1,2,3... levels of indirection) linked against
> > openssl adds the exception.
>
> No, we should simply not be linking libmysql
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 03:30:59PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 03:31:44PM +0100, Christian Hammers wrote:
> > On 2005-02-11 sean finney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 10:15:55AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> > > > FYI: new mysql FLOSS includes OpenSSL licen
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 09:49:31PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
>
> > For what concern proftpd, it does not use libpam-mysql at all,
> > so I see no problem for that.
>
> Hello,
> Ehh. As maintainer of a PAM-using application you usually have no
> control which PAM modules are used. You just shi
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:35:41AM -0800, Marc Singer wrote:
> I've been under the impression that the only machine-level
> incompatibilities are really kernel and driver issues and not issues
> with Debian per se.
>
> Can you be a little more specific?
>
Currently for instance Matlab 6.5+ canno
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 02:34:07PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Hello,
> These four packages also link against both libpam and libmysqlclient10
> and might experience segfaults when accessing MYSQL over PAM with
> libpam-mysql if libpam-mysql switched to libmysqlclient12:
>
> linesrv-mysql, pur
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 03:27:26PM +0100, Enrico Zini wrote:
> There were quite many backup programs without the admin::backup tag.
> Now admin::backup counts 61 packages: good!
>
> If someone wants to take care of keeping the admin::backup tag up to
> date, please send me a note.
hdup?
--
Fran
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 02:33:24PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
> Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> It may sound a bit radical, but core points have been mentioned in the
> >> thread already. I suggest to do it in a more radical way:
> >>
> >> - unstable lockdown in the freeze
> >>
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 10:44:58PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > It may sound a bit radical, but core points have been mentioned in the
> > thread already. I suggest to do it in a more radical way:
> >
> > - unstable lockdown in the freeze
> > - drop Testing and concentrate on work instead of w
On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 11:54:05AM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Okay, that's what t-p-u is roughly for, but the fact is that it's
> >> quite painful.
> >
> > Could you elaborate on that? Why is it so painful?
>
> Probably because you need m
Subject says all. Interested people can have a look on it and return
feedback on BTS. I have no intention to release 1.2.10 in sarge at this
time, anyway.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 10:43:14AM +0900, Clemens Schwaighofer wrote:
>
> Furthermore, we should all know that Anti-Spam, Anti-Virus is a CPU &
> memory hog. It needs tons of memory and fastest cpu ... always.
>
I'm using now bogofilter and razor, without CPU and memory problems at all.
So your
On Sun, Oct 10, 2004 at 02:53:58PM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Oct 2004 12:36:48 +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Not always. In the past many backports have been built including perfectly
> >avoidable new dependencies. The vola
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:04:10PM +0200, alphac wrote:
> I think hal + dbus-1 + fstab-sync works very well on debian, but the
> real missing feature is the possibility for users to mount remote file
> systems like cifs and smbfs without having root privileges or having to
> suidroot smbmnt, th
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 01:23:42PM +0200, Francesco Paolo Lovergine wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:57:46PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:46:05PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> > > Il giorno sab, 09-10-2004 alle 12:23 +0200, Michae
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 12:57:46PM +0200, Michael Banck wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:46:05PM +0200, Bluefuture wrote:
> > Il giorno sab, 09-10-2004 alle 12:23 +0200, Michael Banck ha scritto:
> >
> > > What is updtfstab?
> > I use this on sarge/sid and works very fine:
> > http://ccomb.fre
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 03:01:11AM -0400, Kevin Mark wrote:
> Packages like virus checkers seem to be
> composed of 2 parts: the app program and the data where the data in
> this case are virus sigs and the app is say clamav. And the 'volitile'
> part is the virus sigs whereas the app (once it hits
On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:28:10AM +0200, Jesus Climent wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 03:51:29PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> >
> > I generally have to resort to backports or unstable when installing
> > Debian
> > on recent hardware, because we don't update hardware drivers in stable.
>
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 03:51:29PM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> On Friday 08 October 2004 11:51 am, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > - volatile is not "just another place" for backports, but should only
> > contain changes to stable programs that are necessary to keep them
> > functional;
>
> I ge
I'll add a few my consideration already discussed in IRC with Andi and
others. Feel free to fill the gaps :)
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 05:51:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we had some discussion about volatile, and I'm more and more considering to
> pick this task up. I think some
On Tue, Oct 05, 2004 at 06:58:07PM +0200, Joachim Reichel wrote:
>
> If the names above are still too generic, I think I will use libcore++ as
> prefix. Or has anyone else another suggestion?
>
Why not libexact?
> I'm a bit uncertain about potential consequences if the Debian package name
> d
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 10:36:53AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I think dpkg-statoverride is not too bad in this case. I'll talk to
> >the nis package maintainer and see if that's acceptable. If not, nis
> >cou
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 03:53:58PM -0500, Andrés Roldán wrote:
> Is the mcrypt maintainer MIA?
>
> The last mcrypt package was released the last year (November) and
> there are newer mcrypt and libmcrypt upstream releases.
>
Ask [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
Package: wnpp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-08-28
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: xoops
Version : 2.0.3
Upstream Author : Kazumi Ono, Goghs Cheng, et al,
See [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* URL : http://www.xoops.org/
* License : GPL
Descripti
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:15:35AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >
> > So, I wonder if someone has already built a package from a SRPM package
> > ?
>
> You can easily extract the .tar.gz using alien.
>
rpm -Uvh estracts in /usr/src/rpm/SOURCES
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 12:33:08PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
>
> What we need is a database with simple mailing list function (similar to
> PTS) where willing sponsors for a certain package can subscribe and
> sponsorees with much motivation can send diffs for the next version
> upgrade. Easy to
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:50:03AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> Tollef Fog Heen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Then he should spend the 10 minutes it takes to implement a "reject"
> button on the webpage he can just press to reject someone.
> After that rejecting would be a matter of seco
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:30:35AM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> >
> > Someone should point NMs to difficulty of entering the development
> > mainstream of FreeBSD or becoming maintainer for the kernel...
> > IMO it's generally too easy entering in Debian.
>
> You can get access to the gc
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:10:24PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> Interessting analysis. Many things that hold up the release can only be
> solved by active and experienced maintainers since the packages are often
> essential. New developers can help maintaining them in cooperation with
> main develo
Hi guys
this is to announce a preview (off sid) for current (cvs)
version of proftpd. Testing and comments are welcome.
An (incomplete) IPv6 patch is also available.
http://people.debian.org/~frankie/debian/sid/experimental/proftpd/
The package will not be uploaded in sid, until a complete IPv6
On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 12:31:14PM -0700, Brian Nelson wrote:
>
> >* Acknowledge NMU (closes: #174301, #172803, #179036, #177616)
Ugh, also this one. Do not use changelog for closing fixed bugs.
Do it using BTS directly.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
On Sat, Apr 19, 2003 at 09:40:07PM +0300, Jarno Elonen wrote:
>
> Additionally, it might be a good idea to provide a shoreter list of authors
> in
> addition to the detailed one for easier copying to 'standard copyright files'
> like 'copying' in Debian.
>
GNU folks generally use a Credits fi
I like maintaining the idea of forge, so my proposal is VULCAN
(from Roman mithology).
He was the God of volcanic fire and of metal work. He was
the son of Hera (and maybe Zeus).(Some say that Hera gave
birth to Hephaestus alone because she was angry with Zeus,
because Athena was born out of Zeus'
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 07:29:36PM -0500, Stephen Gran wrote:
> >
> > Jeff
> When I do this sort of thing on my local mirror, I usually pretend it's
> an NMU - so your package would be 0.5.17-4.1 or something. This
> prevents apt from preferring the Debian distributed pakage over yours.
> Either
74 matches
Mail list logo
